(17) sean@pulse: ~ $ ls -G
ls: illegal option -- G
usage: ls [-ACFHLPRTWacdfgiklnoqrstu1] [file ...]
(18) sean@pulse: ~ $
sure about that? output from a 4.0-STABLE system, last cvsup'd july 1.
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > What about it for 4.
I install Star Office 5.2 on my 4.0-STABLE box tonight. I didn't use
ports. I ahve linux emulation enabled. I got the bin file, ran it and it
installed.
The only quirk I hit was the location Star Office looks for test in.
It wanted it in /usr/bin/test and it's in /bin/test. A simple ln -s later,
Geez, with all that info, I'll get right on a patch. sometimes too much
information can be a bad thing man.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently discovered a bug in the StarOffice5 Port, and so I can't
> install it.
> [frederik@server frederik]$ uname -a
>
Bridges create a broadcast zone. broadcast packets will cross the bridge
unobstructed.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Nick Evans wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't bridging of two interfaces supposed to
> make a duplicate of the traffic from one onto another? Why is it then that
> on the second
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 03-Jul-00 Doug Barton wrote:
> > Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Sean Lutner wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm experiencing the same thing. ls --color doesn't
I'm experiencing the same thing. ls --color doesn't seem to work for me
unless like Doug, I set TERM=xterm-color.
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> The new improved ncurses version of the color ls stuff doesn't display
> for me if I am in a "normal" xterm. If I set TERM equal to xte
6 matches
Mail list logo
