Yes, it does that. iirc so that you can have things like
void foo(int cond) {
if (cond) {
static int i = 7;
} else {
static int i = 8;
}
}
working correctly.
I dont know why scsi_low_statics is there multiple times.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36:13PM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
Why do you need this? Format-extensions are kernel only (which you dont use I
presume) and no-align-long-strings is boot only (which you dont use either).
Hm? :)
roman
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:27:51AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> This patch conditionalizes a pair of FreeBSD compiler extension
There's our very own
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/elftoolchain/wiki/libdwarf
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:05:15AM -0400, Ewart Tempest wrote:
> I have developed some flight recording capability in the JUNOS FreeBSD
> based kernel, with the flight recorded data being captured in binary
> form
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> RD>> Hi Roman,
> RD>>
> RD>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
&g
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> RD>You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :)
>
> Yeah, that was some time ago ...
>
> RD>When a job is abo
hi harti!
You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :)
When a job is about to be executed in JobStart() a pipe is created with
its ends connected to job->inPipe/job->outPipe. When the job is actually
created in JobExec() the ps.out is set to job->outPipe so that in
JobD
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:36:39AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
> Where is it documented?
> Are there differences with the linux ABI?
>
> Particularly I am interested in stack alignment requirement. For example
> i386 Solaris, Linux and MacOS have 16 bit stack alignment for procedure
> calls. This is refl
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:25:01AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Feb 1 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:51:58AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Mon Jan 31 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > > > no problem with this with clang :)
>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:51:58AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Mon Jan 31 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > no problem with this with clang :)
>
> hmso compiling the following code
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> if (1<2)
> ;
> }
no problem with this with clang :)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:29:41PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i noticed freebsd has a few of the following macros:
>
> #define FUNC(sb)
>
> when you do something like
>
> if (cond)
> FUNC(i)
>
> the compiler complains about an if statem
does "kldstat | grep nvidia" show anything? if not
kldload nvidia
or
echo nvidia_load=\"YES\" >> /boot/loader.conf
reboot
does this change anything? you seem to be missing /dev/nvidiactl
which probably means that the nvidia module is not loaded
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:43:12PM -0800, Duane H
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:15:52PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping we could remove libobjc from the base system as it's seriously
> outdated and it's not used by anything on the base system.
>
> If there are any objections, please speak up.
please wait until the ports are convert
are you aware of Summer of Code 2008 project by Mayur Shardul?
quoting: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/summerofcode-2008.html
Project: VM Algorithm Improvement
Student: Mayur Shardul
Mentor: Jeff Roberson
Summary:
A new data structure, viz. radix tree, was implemented and used for management
of
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:05:33AM -0800, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> Thank you for replying !
>
> The patch for FreeBSD 8.0 original source is here :
> http://gist.github.com/350230
looks good
I wonder - why don't we store the callouts in binary
tree so the searching for nearest callout is faster?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:39:04AM -0800, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started to work dynamic ticks in FreeBSD, and now experimental
> code start to work roughly.
> The code is here : http://github.com/oza/FreeBSD-8.0-dyntick
this is great! would it be possible for you to provide a patch
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:24:57PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Garrett Cooper writes:
> > C-shell globs as some programming languages referring to it as,
> > i.e. perl (which this is a subset of the globs concept) allow for
> > expansion via `*' to be `anything'. Regexp style globs for wh
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:28:55AM +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as per http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612, could one
> please apply the following patch?
the patch in question seems to be GPLv3, we cant apply it then...
___
freebsd-ha
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:42:17PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Alex Kozlov wrote:
>
> >Of course ps or top output much more convenient, but if setproctitle so
> >expencive and will be called so often, then SIGINFO may be good
> >compromise.
>
> Regarding speed of setproctitle(), here are some mic
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:20:36PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" writes:
> > > So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler
> > > tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
> >
> > Who's "we"?
> >
> > Anyway,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov :
>
> > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and
> > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used
> > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "onl
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:18:46AM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> > > Hi, hackers!
> > >
> > > Recently I am playing the
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> Hi, hackers!
>
> Recently I am playing the clangbsd i386 branch and it works. I've noticed
> that clang using gcc to linking object code or even doing assembling.
>
> clang from FreeBSD perspective will be a whole compiler tool
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hi Roman
>
> Den 04/06/2009 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky:
> >
> >you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it).
> >there's also some
> >effort to make gnu ld usab
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
>
> >You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
> >installed
> >as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
>
> Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
>
> You might wan
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Good news everyone!
>
> As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
> into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
> result:
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangb
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:06:34PM -0700, Josef Grosch wrote:
>
> I'm in search for a decent video card. I currently have an Nvidia GeForce
> 8400 GS. It worked pretty well i386 FreeBSD 6.2. I have upgraded my home
> machine and I am running amd64 FreeBSD 7.2 and it just refuses to go into
> X. It
I like the part about using as many variables as possible because
of documentation and performance enhancements. I tend to like
the other changes as well..
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Christoph Mallon wrote:
> Hi hackers@,
>
> as some of you may have noticed, several years ago a ne
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:24:11PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > > Hey Roman,
> > >
> > > Roma
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Hey Roman,
>
> Roman Divacky wrote:
> >I made this patch that highlights today in cal/ncal just like gnu
> >cal does..
> >
> > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/cal.patch
>
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:53:56PM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Roman Divacky wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> >>Hey Roman,
> >>
> >>Roman Divacky wrote:
> >>&
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:24:32PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > Hey Roman,
> >
> > Roman Divacky wrote:
> > >I made this patch that highlights today
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Hey Roman,
>
> Roman Divacky wrote:
> >I made this patch that highlights today in cal/ncal just like gnu
> >cal does..
> >
> > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/cal.patch
>
>
hi
I made this patch that highlights today in cal/ncal just like gnu
cal does..
www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/cal.patch
unless objected I plan to commit this soon (with fixes to style(9))
roman
pgp6bLOqaYr81.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding?
>
> And all applications that use .
which is a nonsense... please move forward
___
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to
> > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ...
>
> > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow()
> > in a hosted environment wh
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:51:13PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 5:21:42 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:31:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 February 2009 5:16:07 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > > > On F
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:31:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 13 February 2009 5:16:07 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > __FILE__ is a string so you can't concat that with anything to produce an
> &g
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> __FILE__ is a string so you can't concat that with anything to produce an
> identifier. In any case, the variable is static so there can't be any
> collision problems with other files.
I was talking about the SYSINIT parameter. thats a
hi
#define TUNABLE_INT(path, var) \
static struct tunable_int __CONCAT(__tunable_int_, __LINE__) = { \
(path), \
(var), \
};
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 02:03:13PM +0900, Alastair Hogge wrote:
> On Thursday 01 January 2009 10:57:26 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> > I have a request related to making FreeBSD to be a viable platform
> > on AMD/Intel 64-bit architectures, such that functionality as
> > requested
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 06:05:34PM -0600, Gerry Weaver wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am working on a driver that collects various network statistics via pfil. I
> have a simple array of structures that I use to store the statistics. I also
> have a user space process that needs to collect these stat
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:36:27PM +0800, Cheng Renquan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:57 PM, ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,all,we have a project which must resolv some domains in the server
> > process
> > our system in FreeBSD 6.2 or 6.3, the server process may open 7000+
> > so
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:56:28PM +0100, Arjan van der Velde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying to get a linux binary running on FreeBSD I encountered
> the following problem during serial port I/O.
>
> Dec 1 22:22:34 soekris kernel: linux: pid 7239 (linuxbinary): ioctl
> fd=0, cmd=0x5409 ('T',9
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:47:25PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fixes two errors when building with -ansi -Wall
>
>
> - --- wwend.c.backup 2008-11-29 22:41:42.0 -0500
> +++ wwend.c 2008-11-29 22:46:08.0 -0500
> @@ -40,12 +40,1
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Martin Laabs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've build succesfully an androgynous libusb. This is a libusb in
> linux binary format with freebsd-like usb-access. (I use it to
> run a jtag-debugging utility which is supplied as a linux
> binary only.)
> Unfortunately I h
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 04:29:46PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Does anyone tried to build world with clang (devel/llvm-devel)? I just
> have tested clang on some code from our tree, gzip and bzip2 for
> example. Well... it works. Gzip compiled with clang become faster, bzip2
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:10:02PM +1200, Ryan French wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently trying to build a custom kernel for my Google Summer of Code,
> and am running into a bit of a problem. I have all of my code compiling, but
> when I get to the linking stage as soon as it comes to the new
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:20:12PM +0300, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm using "textvp_fullpath" function to get full path from vnode up to root
> dir.
> The problem is that, sometimes it works, sometimes no.
>
> I know that "textvp_fullpath" goes through the cache of the v
hi
I have two questions:
1) is kmem_alloc_wait() expensive operation? I believe it's not
very cheap looking at the code but I want confirmation
2) is there a support for memory pools in FreeBSD?
to give you a little background why I am asking this. In NetBSD Andrew Doran
claims that replacing a
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:39:06AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 19 Jun 2008
> 14:38:11 -0700 (PDT)):
>
> >First, a bounty has been posted here:
> >
> >http://blog.kozubik.com/john_kozubik/2007/12/bounty-posted-f.html
> >
>
> From the si
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:00:42 -0400 "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Stephen Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> First of all, for those of you who went to BSDCan, I hope you had a
> pleasant flight/trip back home. :-)
>
> On Saturday I went to the LLVM talk (see http://llvm.org/), which I
> really enjoyed. On Friday Remko Lo
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:25:56AM -0400, David Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > when we want to use a hash table in kernel we call "hashinit" which
> > initializes a hash table with power-of-2 size. There's also
hi
when we want to use a hash table in kernel we call "hashinit" which
initializes a hash table with power-of-2 size. There's also "phashinit"
that creates hash table of size that is a prime number. This was
added in 1995 by davidg@ but it is not used anywhere in the kernel.
phk@ commited rev. 1.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:45:48AM +0200, Konrad Jankowski wrote:
> Greetings to all in the FreeBSD community!
> My long-time dream of joining has come!
welcome! your project will help tons of people who are (attempting to)
run databases on fbsd ;)
thnx!
roman
___
> I think someone gave the reason I'm about to: trying to copy a NULL
> pointer means I have a bug somewhere earlier in my code that will
> eventually produce visibly wrong results - a segfault being such. The
> sooner that happens after the bug, the less code I have to search to
> find it, the bet
hi
there's an awfully lot of code like
char foo[MAXPATHLEN];
in the kernel. either in functions (ie. allocated on stack during runtime)
or global variables. Most of the usage is without a good reason and only
wastes space.
should we do something about it? maybe an idea in projects/ideas
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 04:50:38PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Because my mpsafetty project in Perforce is going quite well, I'm
> considering running some kind of cron job to generate nightly diffs, so
> other people (interested friends, colleagues and others) to test my
> wor
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:23:58AM -0700, Rao, Nikhil wrote:
>
> Ok, I should have caught that :-( Another question -
> Now that the PROC_LOCK on p is obtained the all_proc lock is released
> and the function returns, at this point can't the proc get deallocated ?
well.. thats why you hold the p
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:03:31PM -0700, Rao, Nikhil wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> The pfind(..) (in kern_proc.c) function below returns the proc structure
> for the PID passed in
>
> Say the thread that calls pfind() gets blocked at PROC_LOCK(p) (line 255
> below), in the meantime what prevents the pro
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:29:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I'm trying to get vmware3 working on FreeBSD RELEASE 7.0 for i386
> > I've resolved every compilation pr
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:29:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm trying to get vmware3 working on FreeBSD RELEASE 7.0 for i386
> I've resolved every compilation problem except one:
> the driver.c in vmware3 requires the "avail_end" variable
> in 6.2's /usr/include/machine/pmap.
> i wanna goto youtube! {:} i already have firefox installed, is there
> a special port for linux firefox? i better deinstall my existing firefox?
swfdec (in ports) handles youtube (and a lot of other things) just fine
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:34:51AM +0300, sam wrote:
> program-test (experimental) for testing syscall linux_getdents()
> http://cs.udmvt.ru/files/temp/linux_dbg.tar.bz2
> includes:
> * temp/ - test_dir with files (special for crash situation)
> * linux_getdents.c - source of program-test
> * linu
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> >
> >In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
> >granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by bett
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 03:33:24AM +, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Where do I find the main() [and/or other entery point] for the
> kernel I tend to understand stuff better if I follow the flow of
> exec from the start
note that "kernel" as such does not "exist". its threads/processes running
c
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 04:07:41PM +0400, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
> > I'm trying to get user-mode Linux to run under FreeBSD Linux emulation (on
> > i386).
>
> Ivan,
>
> current status & patches are on http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/linux/.
what fbsd version are you using? if 7.x is it with 2.4 emul
here is a little review of mine... just little suggestions.
Index: i386/i386/trap.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.307
diff -u -r1.307 trap.c
--- i386/i386/trap.c26 Jul 2007 15:32:55 -000
> Take a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING : 20070327:
> AFFECTS: users of emulators/linux_base-fc6
> AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ATTENTION! The port is experimental for now. Use it at your own risk. This
> port may be used only with 7-CURRENT and compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16.
>
> So it's not ju
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:36:20AM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, sam wrote:
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > i am try runing Enemy Territory: Quake Wars server
> > (links on http://weec.ovl.ru/csdivision/index.php?topic=662.0 )
> >
> > # uname -rms
> > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE amd64
> >
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:10:48PM +0800, Nex Mon wrote:
> thanks for your reply.
>
> i didn't use WITNESS. it is disabled.
>
> is their a list a list of which locks are sleepable and non-sleepable
> in FreeBSD6.2? is sleeping triggered by a call to "sleep", IO operation
> or a result of context
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:27:56PM +0800, Nex Mon wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Can someone point me out or explain the technical details of this kernel
> panic:
>
> sleeping thread (tid 100093, pid 2676) owns nonsleepable lock
> panic: sleeping thread
it just says that some thread owns a nonsleepable
hi
tsleep() maps to _sleep() with lock = NULL,
the _sleep() contains this:
KASSERT(timo != 0 || mtx_owned(&Giant) || lock != NULL ||
ident == &lbolt, ("sleeping without a lock"));
which simplifies for tsleep(foo, ...) where foo != lbolt to
"timo != 0 || mtx_owned(&Giant)"
why
> Ok, syscall function passed a proc* as arguments, I don't know where
this does not make any sense... userland processes have no way to
determine where a proc is stored...
what exactly are you trying to achieve?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 03:24:17PM +, Eren Erdemli wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Sorry to disturb you's but I have a question and would like to know if you
> can assist me.
>
> I am new to freebsd programing and I am trying to get the current working
> directory of the curthread.
>
> I have h
> In general, how does one decide which CPUTYPE to use? The connection
> between the options for CPUTYPE and the output of dmesg is not so
> obvious to me. I looked at the features advertised by dmesg (which in
> my case included SSE3) and then reverse engineered bsd.cpu.mk to figure
> out I
>Unfortunately I have to profile all of the source up the tree to
> create profiled symbols, and I'm running into some issues profiling
> liblegacy.
>Does anyone have any hints for getting around that, or just
> profiling all of the relevant libs?
I think you can build fbsd with profili
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:55:01AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >On 2007-Jun-18 00:39:44 -0700, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>However, I was able to get ktrace output. The only problem is that
> >>ktrace(1) apparently outputs only in binary, instea
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi
>
> currently in exit1() we call acct_process() with Giant held.
> I looked at the code and I think this is because of tty need
> for Giant locking. Because of this we have to release process limit
> in a
hi
currently in exit1() we call acct_process() with Giant held.
I looked at the code and I think this is because of tty need
for Giant locking. Because of this we have to release process limit
in a separate PROC_LOCK()/UNLOCK() block.
my just-to-look-at patch does this
1) moves the acct_process
> Now there's only the matter of importing it :)
>
you mean... like was done 2 weeks ago? :)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to use file(1) to detect file system type on partitions, and
> so far it's working for any file system I've cared to try (the usual MS
> and Linux list) *except* UFS2.
>
> Detecting UFS1 works, though much more verbo
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
> >> index" and pkg_version and things like th
> cyclic dependancies in it!), but still, in itself, I think the choice of
> Ruby isn't performance-critical.
ruby2.0 will come with a virtual machine which should speed up things. ruby2.0
is expected "soon enough" (2008?)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Hi,
> So far I've tested it under -current, in my diskless env. where
> /etc & /compat/linux are unionfs'ed with a mfs, and so all seems OK.
there's an XXX in the linuxulator code saying:
XXX Untested vs. mount -o union; probably does the wrong thing.
can you confirm that it works ok wit
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:24:16PM +0300, Tyrael wrote:
> Has anyone started working on porting 'prebind' from OpenBSD?
>
> Has there been any discussion over this matter; as to how much work this
> would require ?
> I would be interested into looking over this and see if i can implement it,
> so
86 matches
Mail list logo
