c/sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot.
> *** Error code 1
I am experiencing the exact same problem with a fresh svn checkout
--
Pascal Hofstee
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e new structure, and an oshmctl() with the old layout. While
> doing that, it makes sense to do all the other ABI-related things that we'd
> like to get out of the way, such as fixing the types in shm_perm.
I understand ... i'll leave th
at the attached patch (available at
http://callisto.offis.uni-oldenburg.de/shm_segsz-int2size_t.diff in
case the attachment gets stripped off by the mailinglist software) and
provide any feedback where appropriate.
--
Pascal Hofstee
diff -rwuBb src.ref/lib/libc/sys/shmctl.2 src/lib/libc/sys/shmctl.2
to see if i can find additional occurances of similar
discrepancies so these could be fixed in a single run.
Any additional sugestions/objections are always greatly appreciated.
--
Pascal Hofstee
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
27;t be a more proper type for this
field .. and if it would make sense to perhaps synchronize our datatypes
used here with those used by Linux?
With kind regards,
--
Pascal Hofstee
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
at's my understanding of the matter).
You may want to check the freebsd-gnome@ list and do a search for
ltverhack. It is my understanding that it is the intention to have this
bogon fixed in ports post 6.0.
--
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
es by the name of
Willow` on ##FreeBSD on the FreeNode IRC-network. Feel free to drop by
sometime.
--
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
tils/portupgrade (specifically .. portsclean -D)
--
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:37:00 +0200, Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:17:31AM -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> It didn't make it through this time, either. Note that the FreeBSD
> mailing list manager rejects attachments of certain types, so
OOpps .. forgot to actually attach my kvmtest.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:05:31 -0800, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well .. i noticed that kvm_getargv indeed only seems to use /proc in
> case that apparently the commandline argument list grows beyond a
> certain size, as i have been able to establish by trial and
in cases the command + argument list grows beyond a certain
size.
Because if that IS the case .. the manpage doesn't reflect this.
--
With kind regards,
Pascal Hofstee
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
ends on the existince of a working /proc .. even though
the manpage states this condition is only present for kvm_getenvv ?
And if kvm_getargv should not depend on /proc ... how can we go about
to fixing this as this is apprently only the case for "short
commandlines" in our current implement
een included by then.
--
Pascal Hofstee
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:12:08 -0700, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a few hours of digging through both the glib-2 as well as the
> beep-media-player sources i finally managed to figure out why
> beep-media-player apprently crashes on startup when using libpthread,
.
--
With kind regards,
Pascal Hofstee
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cific reason why FreeBSD only provides a static
version of this library, and if that is not the case, what would it
take to make a buildworld provide a shared version of this Objective-C
runtime library ?
With kind regards,
Pascal Hofstee
___
[EMAIL PROT
m
> would reboot :)
Ok ... I guess i will have to hear that blunder of mine for eternity :-))
--
Pascal Hofstee < daeron @ shadowmere . student . utwente . nl >
begin LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs
I'm a signature virus. Please copy me and help me spread.
end
To
ot; to be implemented, so he might actually be able to use
a Unix environment to work with instead of a Windows one.
--
Pascal Hofstee < daeron @ shadowmere . student . utwente . nl >
Managers know it must be good because the programmers hate it so much.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
en perfectly ... I agree on compat_
the suggestions i provided were just to illustrate the idea ... in the
hopes to get some discussion and attention on the whole idea.
----
Pascal Hofstee - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UB
filesystem modules
saver_* : For all screensavers (probably would prefer a shorter prefix)
emu_* : For binary compatibilty modules like linux/ibcs2/svr4
of course this is just a suggestion ... just thought i would voice it
here.
Pascal Hofstee - [EMAIL PROTECTED
exact same
thing ... user postfix ... (as well as a group maildrop)
Pascal Hofstee - dae...@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UB P+ L- E--- W- N+ o? K- w--- O? M V? PS+ PE Y-- PGP--
t+ 5 X-- R tv+ b+ DI D- G e* h+
exact same
thing ... user postfix ... (as well as a group maildrop)
Pascal Hofstee - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UB P+ L- E--- W- N+ o? K- w--- O? M V? PS+ PE Y-- PGP--
t+ 5 X-- R tv+ b+ DI D- G e* h+ r- y+
--END GEEK
e base.
(it was basically some very minor changes to the linux-code ... with a
rewrite of the cd-audio code) ...
as far as the pthread-concel functions are concerned ... i don't really
know much about the current status on this issue.
----
Pascal Ho
s that is where I have the main developer pf the SDL-librray do the
porting)
The only problem is that the pthread_cancel functions are not in our
pthread implementation yet
----
Pascal Hofstee - dae...@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
's PTHREAD implementation ?
----
Pascal Hofstee - dae...@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UB P+ L- E--- W- N+ o? K- w--- O? M V? PS+ PE Y-- PGP--
t+ 5 X-- R tv+ b+ DI D- G e* h+ r- y+
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
26 matches
Mail list logo
