On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk writes:
> > I am NOT able to understand the merit of these products with respect
> > to their features and PRICES.
>
> Please stop SHOUTING, and learn to accept and respect the fact that
>
much more cheaper full featured PC like systems
( DDR3 memory , 64-bit capable processors , with a disadvantage about power
requirements ) .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk writes:
> > At present, there is NO any processor which is ONLY 32-bits.
>
> All the world is not a PC. There are still 32-bit x86-based embedded or
> small-form-factor systems, such as the s
( cards ) is much more useful than working on 32 bits
version .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
dy agree ?
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=212423#post212423 ?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Ali
> > _
>
Dear Adrian ,
You are really right , and correct .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
jects: NFS Version 4 Open Source Reference Implementation
We are developing an implementation of NFSv4 and NFSv4.1 for Linux
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/readme.html
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/
Thank you very
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 28/11/2012 18:36 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk said the following:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Andriy Gapon > <mailto:a...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> >
> > on 28/11/2012 16:31 David W
t; And, big oops sorry, forgot one very important detail - it has to be C.
>
> --
> Andriy Gapon
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JUNG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfig
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVG-edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Graph_drawing
c.com/about/
"Mercurial is free software licensed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License Version 2 <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt> or any
later version."
No one of them above mentions "BSD license" , or "dual license" , etc.
Thank you
ne
1991
<http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l3>
"
In their repository , it is GPL v2 .
Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ?
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.
is device into "Hardware Profile File" .
For removable devices , if some USB , etc. ports are not used , they all
may be
marked as "No Check" , for example internal USB ports , unused back panel
ports .
I do not know such a scheme is useful or not , or usable or not .
If I w
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:24 PM, wrote:
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if spinning up a "live DVD" desktop version, using
> > > GENERIC, and/or Gnome/KDE might be a good opt
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> Greetings...
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:47 -0400
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jerry McAllister
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Wojciec
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
> >
> > > My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is
> > > its
> >
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk"
>
> My opinion is that most important obstacle in front of FreeBSD is its
>> installation structure :
>>
>>
>> It is NOT possibl
lure" and mentioning it in front of FreeBSD is
only to create another obstacle for it .
Trouble for PC-BSD is that , for me , it is an untested ( as even as a
simple installation on a bare hardware ) distribution .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
__
tion facility
into loader.conf
will be a useful improvement , because it seems that schedulers are not
equivalent .
In that way , it will be possible to select a scheduler for compute
intensive processing , or
input/output intensive processing , or user interaction intensive
processing .
My c
wide population due to user interface settings . I am NOT
blaming the developers because such efforts to improve user interface
requires experiments , researches , and EXPENSES . It is NOT a right and
fair policy to expect such activities from developers . They are
ent t test to check equality of means after applying a test
of equality of variances .
If the fork time means are different statistically , smaller mean fork time
is better than the other ( FreeBSD versus Linux ) .
If the variances are different , the systems are different .
Smaller variance is better tha
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> On May 14, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <
> m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Michael Reifenberger <
> m...@reifenberger.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> this
loyed for the FreeBSD : If a kernel.old is generated
, it may be inserted into Kernel Selection menu automatically . If , at
present , there is no kernel selection menu but boot sector is used directly
, kernel build system may modify that structure also to uti
oded drive numbers with respect to attached slot of
the computer )
- and other related modifications not mentioned here or not recognized at
present by me .
I am sorry to present an off-topic subject into this thread , but to obtain
such a facility , it is necessary to be able to detect structu
toward this counter is a strong hate . After every
operating system install , the first task I am doing is to disable that
counter completely or increase it to at least 1000 .
Default boot mode is not always the best and please assume that every one
will not be able to respond immediately due t
23 matches
Mail list logo
