Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems

2007-02-25 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware. Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a different value effect for running programms or just started ones ? P.S. I assum

Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems

2007-02-25 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, It would be really great if we could find "workload owners" who would maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly on a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and testing patches. Kris has done this for SQL benchmarks to great effect

Solution: FreeBSD and MySQL - mysqld eats CPU alive

2004-08-02 Thread Martin Blapp
_r.so libpthreads.so hangs occasionally FreeBSD Current --- You can use libpthrads.so or libc_r.so Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse

Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic (fwd)

2003-09-16 Thread Martin Blapp
>From: David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic Yes, I don't think this email will make it to hackers@ because all the email fro

Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic

2003-09-16 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > #!/bin/bash > while :; do > ping -f -s 65467 ip_addr & > done So probably mbuf exhaustion. > > Here's the NIC info: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x00ed16ec chip=0x12161113 rev=0x11 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Accton Technology Corporation' > device = 'EN5251-Base

Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic

2003-09-16 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 > #1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 > #2 0xc0168675 in panic (fmt=0xc02db260 "m_copydata, offset > size of mbuf > chain") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 > #3 0xc018576e in m_copydata (m=0xc1560d00, off=

Re: apache2's perchild MPM not working under 5.0-RELEASE

2003-07-17 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, apache2's perchild MPM works with with libthr or libkse. So please update. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln,

Re: Driver vor Watchdog

2003-07-04 Thread Martin Blapp
gt; help you can find out the source of the deadlock or crash of your system) > ># the last reset-reason ('normal' power-ON, manual reset due a user- or > failure reset, a reset triggered trough the watchdog card) can be read out. A tool to debug these would be ne

Re: patch: (forw) linux_sigvec.c

2003-02-26 Thread Martin Blapp
FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/ipcs/ipcs.c,v 1.12.2.3 2001/07/30 10:16:41 dd Exp $"; + "$FreeBSD$"; You don't need to do that. It is automatically done by cvs. Just leave the lines there. I'll test it this evening on a old STAB

Jdk13/14 still hangs in 4.8 Prerelease. Outstanding Fix needs to becommitted.

2003-02-25 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, To tell the short story. Linux-mozilla works like a charm as root, but it doesn't as a user if you have a java-applet. Some solutions are mentioned for jdk4 but they applly to jdk13 too: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=5dfc5db60b48af3f&rnum=1 http://docs.freebsd.or

Re: mysql endless loops

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Blapp
with mysql on FreeBSD linked with libc_r: Short version of problems with native threading support (userland threads): 1. Non-thread safe DNS Lookups 2. Unfair Scheduling 3. High Load 4. No SMP Support 5. Missing Locks http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/000203.html Martin Martin Blapp

ACPI: working ACPI vs broken ACPI

2003-02-15 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I see these differences here in acpidump: Working board: PM2_GPE0_BLK=0xe428-0xe42f Broken board: PM2_GPE0_BLK=0x428-0x42f PM2_GPE1_BLK=0x528-0x52f, GPE1_BASE=32 And the broken board shows errors like this: The errors like: Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACP

Re: Bad crash with if_bge when loaded as module in loader.conf

2003-02-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > Wild guess: You have miibus compiled into the kernel and it gets > pulled in a second time when kldloading if_bge? Correct ! I'll look if that solves the crash. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Bad crash with if_bge when loaded as module in loader.conf

2003-02-12 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, Even more bad is that there is no escape from serial console, I can do what I like, call boot(), panic() etc. I get a endless loop. This is 4.7 STABLE from today. It panics when I try to ifconfig the bge0 interface. Doing initial neFtwork setup:atal trap 12: page fault while in kernel m

HEADS UP: Broken if_dc NICs with MACs like 08:08[...] or 00:00[...]

2003-02-07 Thread Martin Blapp
dc_link; u_int8_tdc_cachesize; + int dc_romwidth; int dc_pnic_rx_bug_save; unsigned char *dc_pnic_rx_buf; int dc_if_flags

Re: umount of procfs fails

2003-01-26 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I just checked the code. Umount(8) is fine. Unmount(2) is buggy. > Looks like the wrong got unmounted. The mountlist should > be traversed in reverse order. umount(8) works as it should: umount -v procfs procfs: unmount from /mnt (but it does unmount /proc) umount(8) hands over the ri

Re: umount of procfs fails

2003-01-26 Thread Martin Blapp
in a PANIC (TM). I'll try to fix the userland stuff. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax:

Re: dummy/dynamic flash plugin

2002-10-24 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Cool, it really works ! But I had to copy both libs to the plugin dir: cd /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/ cp flash_linux/libflashplayer.so ./libflashplayer_linux.so cp flash_linux/ShockwaveFlash.class ./ Thanks for the wonderful work ! Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

Re: [tulip-bug] FreeBSD Problems with dc(4) ADMtek AN985 chip

2002-09-06 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > This technique cannot be efficiently used with mbufs in *BSD, so there > must be two different ring handling code paths: both chained > and wrapped-ring configurations. Ok > That's very likely a media selection problem, rather than a Rx > descriptor problem. Of course resetting the chip

Re: FreeBSD Problems with dc(4) ADMtek AN985 chip

2002-09-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I have a 100mbit full-duplex connection, maybe this is the difference ? > 10mbit half-duplex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FreeBSD Problems with dc(4) ADMtek AN985 chip

2002-09-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > The NIC is the external interface on my gateway. It was originally > connected to an old HP 8-port 10bT hub and is now connected directly to > a Westel DSL bridge. It has worked seemingly without problems handling > the 768/128 DSL traffic. I say seemingly because I've never bothered >

FreeBSD Problems with dc(4) ADMtek AN985 chip

2002-09-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A

Re: Memory corruption in CURRENT

2002-08-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Terry, > > > > options DISABLE_PSE > > > > options DISABLE_PG_G I'm now at buildworld IV, since I have these options compiled it the bug did not show up again. Another sideeffect: Before that I could not even make -j 10 buildworld, that ended with a page fault somewhere im pmap.

Re: Memory corruption in CURRENT

2002-08-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > options DISABLE_PSE > options DISABLE_PG_G Just added them. I'll now build 20 buildworlds with those enabled. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Memory corruption in CURRENT

2002-08-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Soeren, > However, this kind of problem in most cases spells bad HW to me, > ie subspec RAM, poor powersupply, badly cooled CPU, overclocking etc etc... That's what I thought too. I have now three different systems which show all this: 1) PIV 1,6Ghz, Intel B845DG Board, 1GB Kingston Ram, 2)

Memory corruption in CURRENT

2002-08-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I suspect all the SIG4 and SIG11 problems we see are due memory corruption in CURRENT. > In the latter case, the affected file looks like: > > case HASH('^', 'e'): > case HASH('^', 'i'): > case HASH('^' 'o'): > \xc0 case HASH('^', 'u'): > %case HADH('`', \xc0A'): > ^@ase HASH(

Re: Wrong paths for named-xfer (STABLE/CURRENT)

2002-08-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > > We don't install named into /usr/local, do we ? > > We don't use Makesfile inside src/contrib. Thanks very much ! > See src/usr/sbin/named/Makefile.inc where the values are correct. Ahh know I see what happened. I went one time into src/contrib last week and typed make at the wrong pl

Wrong paths for named-xfer (STABLE/CURRENT)

2002-08-13 Thread Martin Blapp
+DESTEXEC = /usr/libexec DESTMAN = /usr/share/man DESTHELP= /usr/share/misc DESTETC= /etc We don't install named into /usr/local, do we ? Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare

Re: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state

2002-07-08 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > Are you running -current? I did a quick (but safe) hack in -stable hoping > that people would test -current and report back. Nobody did. Yes, I'm running CURRENT. > If you are running -current, I will be able to make the error message go > away, but that will not solve any hang problem

Re: need help: ld final link failed. Memory exhausted

2002-04-23 Thread Martin Blapp
> Because 64MB of stack should be enough for anybody? times have changed ... it seems. The OpenOffice build linking needs definitly more that 64MB. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: need help: ld final link failed. Memory exhausted

2002-04-23 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Setting the max stacksize to 128MB helped. Can we have this as default ? As many users plan to use staroffice, requiring them to recompile kernel just for this would be ... Anyway, is there a reason that the maxstack is 64MB only ? Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

need help: ld final link failed. Memory exhausted

2002-04-23 Thread Martin Blapp
27;(1024 * 1024 * 1024)'" may help in the kernel. Any ideas ? Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 06

STLPORT and gcc3 (openoffice porting)

2002-03-17 Thread Martin Blapp
iosfwd:33, from ../stlport/stl/_string_fwd.h:23, from ../stlport/stl/_string.h:31, from ../stlport/string:42, from dll_main.cpp:45: ../g++-v3/cwchar:69: `mbstate_t' not declared I get a different error then ... Anybody k

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-14 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > This is a case of exception context register getting clobbered in > shared library function call. GCC does not reload it when needed and > this ultimately leads to semi-random word in program memory decremented > by the __cp_pop_exception function. The bug is only triggered under very > s

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-14 Thread Martin Blapp
> Per thread exception stacks? THat's where I'd look... Hmm, good point. The programms that crashed were all threaded ... Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Kris, > fixes things, or at least identify a list of possible changes which > others can test. How can I compile gcc without doing a "make world" ? Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Kris, > Did you pursue my suggestion of comparing recent patches in the port > and in the source tree? Easy to say, hard to do. STABLE is broken as current is, and it seems that 4.4 and 4.3 are also broken for the STLport test. This is a very difficult thing to do for someone that does not

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
> We are using a set of patches that were part of gcc 2.95.3_test3. > Do you have a sample program in which exceptions are still broken on > FreeBSD 4.5? cd /usr/ports/devel/stlport make install cd work/STL*/test/eh add -O to gcc-freebsd.mk gmake -f gcc-freebsd.mk clean gmake -f gcc-freebsd.mk

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
I removed now #undef DEFAULT_VTABLE_THUNKS and set again #define DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO 1 in the port. The -O tests still succeeded. All cpp* files are the same in the port and our system compilers. And ideas and pointers which subsystems I could test for this breakage ? Martin To Unsubscribe: s

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
STABLE is broken too, but in a different manner. I just added -O and then this happened. [algo] :testing inplace_merge #1() (weak) ... eh_test in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense eh_test in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense eh_test in free(): warning: jun

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > > Here are my test news. The -O bug doesn't happen with > > gcc295 from ports ! > I tried all these FLAGS, but noone of them was creating the problems we see with -O : Optimization Options -fcaller-saves -fcse-follow-jumps -fcse-skip-blocks -fdelayed-branch -felide-constructors -fexpensi

RE: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Blapp
ffice build has survived the segfaulting part now in saxparser. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 061 826 93 00:

OpenOffice c++ Build crash in saxparser

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Blapp
erUrl type = OUString (gdb) whatis locationUrl type = OUString & (gdb) whatis sal_True No symbol "sal_True" in current context. Thanks for helping. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Im

Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
Thanks Daniel ! > + joiner->join_status.error = ESRCH; > + joiner->join_status.ret = NULL; > + joiner->join_status.thread = NULL; Oh wonder. It works no like a charm. :-)) Do you know in what case we can bump the osversion ? Is this o

Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
hi Daniel, > + pthread->join_status.thread = NULL; > + pthread->join_status.ret = NULL; > + pthread->join_status.error = 0; it still hangs :-( How should a detach routine in the client c

Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
and here is the output generated in /var/tmp -DSUPD=641 -DUPD=641 -I. -I.. -I../../../.. -I../../../../inc -I../../../../unxfbsd.pro/idl -I../../../../unxfbsd.pro/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-work/work/oo_641c_src/solver/641/unxfbsd.pro/idl -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-work/work/oo_64

Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Daniel, Unfortunatly the patch doesn't work ... = Building project udkapi = /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-work/work/oo_641c_src/udkapi/com/sun/star/lang mkout -- version: 1.3 idlc @/var/tmp/mk2H0dIj idlc: compile 'ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.idl' ... and there it

Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > This loop is correct, like I've said twice before. > Did you even try the patch I sent you to uthread_detach.c? I've not recieved any patch. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Blapp
if this does not get fixed for some part :-(( I'm very happy if you have more clues than I have. To build openoffice: cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice and see the build hanging. Martin Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <

Re: deadlock with softupdates ?

2001-12-17 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Matt, > Are you sure this is the correct kernel binary? zinitna() doesn't > call vget() and vm_fault doesn't call zinitna. Hrm, sorry, I just have noted that the debug kernel produces slightly different output that the normal kernel :-( Why this ? I didn't do a cvs update since I b

Re: deadlock with softupdates ?

2001-12-17 Thread Martin Blapp
> Do a ps -axl -M vmcore.X -N kernel.X on the kernel core, > pick out all the processes blocked on inode or whatever, inode ps -axl -M vmcore.0 -N /usr/src/sys/compile/NEWS/kernel.debug | grep inode 8 293 290 0 -14 0 36440 inode D#C5- 0:49.73 (perl) 0 2

Re: deadlock with softupdates ?

2001-12-17 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Matt, > Yahoo noticed a deadlock in the vnode recycling code. If your machine > below is hitting the kern.maxvnodes limit it could be the same thing. > The way to tell is to generate a kernel core along with the debug > version of the kernel binary (/usr/src/sys/compile//kern

deadlock with softupdates ?

2001-12-17 Thread Martin Blapp
me 10 at 0xd7b9df2c: ebp d7b9dfa0, eip 0xc028520d : mov%eax,0xffb8(%ebp) Do you have a clue how I can debug this problem ? Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenst

Re: Clock speedup on 4.X FreeBSD SMP and serverworks chipset

2001-09-01 Thread Martin Blapp
> The other macros also have a space befor the semicolons :). Otherwise OK. > Better commit this (especially to 4.4R) until we have something better. I also think that this is important to have fixed. Without this fix, we would have been forced to change the platform for our software to a worki

Re: Clock speedup on 4.X FreeBSD SMP and serverworks chipset

2001-08-31 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I tested your patch and it solved our problem 100%. There's no timedrift anymore. Do you think the patch will make it in 4.4R. ? We need it urgently. Thanks a lot for your analysis and your fast work ! Martin > --- apic_vector.s.old Fri Mar 2 13:47:31 2001 > +++ apic_vector.s Fri Au

Re: Clock speedup on 4.X FreeBSD SMP and serverworks chipset

2001-08-30 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Together with Thomas Moestel, I have found that the following patch seems to solve the gettimeofday() problem and stops the time drift: --- sys/i386/isa/clock.cThu Aug 30 17:01:31 2001 +++ sys/i386/isa/clock.c.newThu Aug 30 17:01:29 2001 @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ high = inb(

Clock speedup on 4.X FreeBSD SMP and serverworks chipset

2001-08-30 Thread Martin Blapp
amm. If someone has a machine where he can install CURRENT, or has a machine with ServerWorks Chipset and SMP, is it possible that he can activate ACPI and test it again ? There is already a PR, PR kern/30135. Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Recent RPC changes to -current

2001-04-14 Thread Martin Blapp
9001011tcp6 :::0.0.0.0.2.197 - superuser 9001011udp 0.0.0.0.3.224 - superuser 9001011tcp 0.0.0.0.2.196 - superuser Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Recent RPC changes to -current

2001-04-14 Thread Martin Blapp
http://home.teleport.ch/freebsd/drac.diff Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 79 370 26 05, Fax: +41 61 826

RE: linux_connect() is broken

2001-01-21 Thread Martin Blapp
return (0); + return (EISCONN); } } Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 79 370 26 05,

Re: [PATCH available] TI-RPC and NetBSD's rpc.lockd

2001-01-06 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I'm making progress with the code and I have also a new diff available. http://www.attic.ch/patches/rpc.diff_01052001-05.tgz > Issues with the code: > > 1.) NETBSD sets in svc_tcp.c some LOCAL_CREDS which we don't have in our > src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c. They have a FLAG which - if set -

Re: [PATCH available] TI-RPC and NetBSD's rpc.lockd

2000-12-26 Thread Martin Blapp
copy /usr/src/etc/netconfig to /etc 7.) Adjust your rc.conf for rpcbind And if you like to test the NetBSD rpc.lockd: 8.) cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.lockd && make && make install I'm off one week and read the emails when I'm back. Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH available] TI-RPC and NetBSD's rpc.lockd

2000-12-25 Thread Martin Blapp
53 tcp883 mountd 151 udp891 mountd 151 tcp883 mountd 132 udp 2049 nfs 133 udp 2049 nfs Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Improware AG, UNIX solution and service

Re: Import and merge of TI-RPC from NetBSD

2000-12-15 Thread Martin Blapp
I forgot a link ... http://www.as400.ibm.com/developer/tirpc/ Cheers: Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 79 370 26 05, Fax: +41 61

Import and merge of TI-RPC from NetBSD

2000-12-15 Thread Martin Blapp
e some are recomanded). The code I 'maintain' (mount utilities) is already patched in my codebase. I've started with merging and adapting and I'd like to have your tips and opinions. Martin PS: this fixes maybe also the issues with 64-Bit RPC code of the rpc-lockd david w

Call for objections

1999-11-14 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi everbody, I had a concept to solve some bad implemented NFS part: The client unmount notification of the NFS server. There seems to be different understanding if the programm rpc.umntall should be started at shutdown, startup or both. Can you please vote for or against these three possibility

HEADS UP: new command rpc.umntall in usr.sbin

1999-11-10 Thread Martin Blapp
The BSD mountd(8) implementation has some design issues. It tries to call RPC.UMNTALL on SIGTERM. According to RFC 1813 it is 1. A bad idea to use broadcast RPC to do the UMNTALL. 2. Beside that our broadcast RPC implementation does use a port remapping on the remote portmapper. The port r

Re: Proposal for the kill-list (userland nfs)

1999-10-08 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, > warnx("WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path"); > before line 667 of /usr/src/sbin/mount_nfs.c. But I don't see anywhere > where it differentiates between delimitors and path-components. It is > just a simple strchr() and the first @ or : it finds is assumed the be I'

Re: Proposal for the kill-list (userland nfs)

1999-10-05 Thread Martin Blapp
> If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount > complain about the @ syntax before you kill it. POLA, you know. > > A complaint such as: > > WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path > > would be sufficient. A good idea, but how can one make a differe

Proposal for the kill-list (userland nfs)

1999-10-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and umount(8) support the following NFS-URL-syntax: mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix or any other Operating System support this syntax. RFC 2224 does

umount(8) or unmount(2) ?

1999-10-02 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Since about 5 weeks I'm working on sanity checks and bug fixes for umount(8), mount(8) and mount_xxx(8). Poul Henning told me to mail to cvs-committers too, cause many clued people read it. You'll find my patch and the readme for it on : http://www.attic.ch/patches/MOUNTPATCH-CURRENT-02101

NFS unmounts while reboot ?

1999-08-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Problem: As I notized, a FreeBSD NFS-client does not unmount it's NFS-mounts during reboot. This can cause problems on the server if it's not BSD. At least Linux complains if there are still nfs-mounted filesystems on the server. It also would be a Good Thing (TM) if /var/db/mountdtab is

NFS unmounts while reboot ?

1999-08-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Problem: As I notized, a FreeBSD NFS-client does not unmount it's NFS-mounts during reboot. This can cause problems on the server if it's not BSD. At least Linux complains if there are still nfs-mounted filesystems on the server. It also would be a Good Thing (TM) if /var/db/mountdtab i