Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Gutch writes: > >On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > >> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: > >> :&g

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Harold Gutch
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: > :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter. > :> > :>http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839 > : > :Interesting, I guess one could work around it by periodically > :sending bog

Re: Problems with German Keyboard

2001-04-17 Thread Harold Gutch
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:56:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I´ve troubles getting german "umlauts" to work properly. I played around This should have gone to -questions or to one of the German lists. Have a look at http://www.de.freebsd.org/de/umlaute/umlaute.html HTH, Harold To

Re: 3dfx driver for freebsd

2000-06-18 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:07:24PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Seeing as how it has been a link on Daemon News' front page for several > > months, I find that hard to believe. :-P > > Not all of us read daemon news, either. As far as I'm concerned, if > it's not part of www.freebsd.org,

Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory...

2000-03-10 Thread Harold Gutch
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:34:58PM -0500, Michael Bacarella wrote: > A BSDI represenative tried for days to convince me over the phone why I > should pay for BSD/OS even though FreeBSD was free, or at least a CD > order away, and FreeBSD even has source code. > > I asked about why we should buy a

Re: sysctl for stack execute?

2000-02-13 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 01:29:46PM -0800, Dru Nelson wrote: > > Is there a sysctl for FreeBSD which prevents execution in > the stack segment? (ie. to prevent attacks from getting root) > I'm using 3.4R. Atsuo Ohki sent a mail to -hackers on Feb 05 with a kernel-patch doing exactly this. The sub

Re: UDF

2000-01-14 Thread Harold Gutch
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 09:29:58AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Brian Beattie wrote: > > I have been looking at UDF ( the filesystem used on CD-RW and DVD's ). I > > was wondering if anybody was working on it. I'm thinking about trying to > > implement it for CD-RW's and would like to

Re: multi-nics in FreeBSD 3.3 Release

2000-01-08 Thread Harold Gutch
First of all, don't reply to other mails if you're not referring to them - it messes up the threads displayed by MUAs that support them. Second, this question would have been more appropriate for -questions. On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 09:52:19AM -0800, Brian D. Moffet wrote: > Of course some one kno

Re: Weird /tmp behaviour

1999-10-28 Thread Harold Gutch
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 11:06:14AM +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote: > Hi all > > We've just noticed something strange here, that probably has a mundane > explanation but we can't figure it out. On a 2.2.8 FreeBSD system, if anyone > creates a file in /tmp, the group gets set to `bin'. The SGID bit is

Re: su-ing a user remotely

1999-10-27 Thread Harold Gutch
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 04:55:30PM -0400, Mark wrote: > > I'm looking for a tool which I think I'll have to end up making myself. > > What I'm looking for Let's say there are two logins on a FreeBSD > machine. On ttyp0 is root, and user fred is logged in on ttyp1. Fred > can't su to root

Re: your mail

1999-10-03 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 07:22:19AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way > how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemented http and ftp URL > fetching and thus eliminated the need for a fetch(1) command. > Couldn't the FreeBSD ftp

Re: about jail

1999-09-25 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 05:17:12PM +0400, Alexander Bezroutchko wrote: > * it is possible to escape from jail > Following program escapes from jail (tested under 4.0-19990918-CURRENT): > > /* --- start of example - */ > #include > #include > > const char *shell = "

Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK standards for OpenGL/Mesa)

1999-09-09 Thread Harold Gutch
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 12:08:01PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > Lots of folk use procmail, but since I'm using qmail as an MTA, > > I thought I'd see if I could use it's native methods, and it's > > really easy, with a shell script

Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK standards for OpenGL/Mesa)

1999-09-09 Thread Harold Gutch
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 12:08:01PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > Lots of folk use procmail, but since I'm using qmail as an MTA, > > I thought I'd see if I could use it's native methods, and it's > > really easy, with a shell scrip

Re: MAC takeover

1999-09-02 Thread Harold Gutch
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 01:18:47PM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Hi, > > IIRC some time ago there was a vivid discussion about ability to > change/set MAC address of Ethernet cards. I'm faced with similar problem > right now: when building high-availability configuration it would be very > hand

Re: MAC takeover

1999-09-02 Thread Harold Gutch
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 01:18:47PM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Hi, > > IIRC some time ago there was a vivid discussion about ability to > change/set MAC address of Ethernet cards. I'm faced with similar problem > right now: when building high-availability configuration it would be very > han

Re: a BSD identd

1999-07-14 Thread Harold Gutch
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 11:47:33PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > We don't _need_ pidentd anymore. It will load down a system more than > the inetd's implementation of ident will. Therefore, pidentd should be > phased out. Other than that, pidentd should be using > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~green/f

Re: a BSD identd

1999-07-14 Thread Harold Gutch
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 11:47:33PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > We don't _need_ pidentd anymore. It will load down a system more than > the inetd's implementation of ident will. Therefore, pidentd should be > phased out. Other than that, pidentd should be using > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~green/

Re: help with CD-Rom

1999-06-18 Thread Harold Gutch
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:57:40PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > > Could someone please explain the diffrence > > between wcd0 and acd0 devices? > > > > What has changed? > > The name. ATAPI CD-ROMs are now called "acd". MAKEDEV will typically > make wcd->acd symlinks in the /dev directory for hys