Mac OS underlying FreeBSD - does it run Linux emulation?

2007-04-04 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Hi, does anyone know whether one can run Linux applications under the underlying FreeBSD of the MAC OS (on an Intel Core Duo mini Mac)? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

VMWARE-Player

2007-01-07 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Hi, does FreeBSD provide the ability to run VMWARE-Player for Linux and run VMs in it? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsu

Re: increasing dd disk to disk transfer rate

2006-01-14 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:29:15PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:23:37PM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > Then I tried to read back > > dd if=/dev/ad2 of=/dev/zero bs=2m > > Yes, just for the fun I said 2m blocksiye. And now we c

Re: increasing dd disk to disk transfer rate

2006-01-13 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:23:37PM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > written by phk) that is designed to do disk-to-disk recovery - it > > copys data in big slabs until it gets an error and then works around > > the faulty area block by block. > > It's called 'recoverdisk', and is in src/tools/to

Re: increasing dd disk to disk transfer rate

2006-01-13 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Thanks, folks, for the interesting contributions. I really should have marked the subject "OT" but there spring up a lot of interesting ideas. On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:13:00AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, 2006-Jan-12 10:48:38 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > >dd if=/dev/ad2 of=/dev/ad3

Re: ffsrecov still broken port?

2005-05-29 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:23:51PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > > What "obvious" reasons? > > > > I meant, when I have a dump image of the entire disk I cannot > > run fsck on the entire dum

Re: ffsrecov still broken port?

2005-05-29 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:46:17PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:16, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > I can create a vnode (mdconfig) of that disk but trying to fsck on it > > fails for obvious reasons, since I had to access the slices and not the

ffsrecov still broken port?

2005-05-29 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
I have a disk dump of a failed drive from some time ago which I want to recover. It is a complete dump with partitions and filesystems and I'm in seek again for a tool to allow me to recover the information from that disk. I was hoping to get a working ffsrecov now under -current but probably tha

ttyd0/cuad0 - why is there still this duality ?

2005-01-24 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Just a question. Maybe it isn't true but to me it seems there is still this duality between ttyd and cuad serial devices. Why is that? I'm just asking because someone I was talking with about modems an comm programs was 'criticising' this fact in FreeBSD "while other systems long have abandoned t

mdconfig - need some help

2004-10-31 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
I'm trying to recover a filesystem. I dd'd /dev/ad2s1e into a 10 GB file and transfered it to another system. # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f ad2s1.dmp md2 # df Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a257838 1687586845471%/ devfs 1

Re: finding alternate superblocks in ffs

2004-10-31 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 02:42:18PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > Yesterday a major desaster happened: I stumbled across the power cable of my > > Dell Inspiron notebook. The notebook fell to the floor. Free

Re: finding alternate superblocks in ffs

2004-10-31 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 03:26:04PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > [...] > > > Any idea what I can do now? > > > > > > I wrote a little program that opens /dev/ad2s1e > > > >

Re: finding alternate superblocks in ffs

2004-10-31 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 03:26:04PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > [...] > > Any idea what I can do now? > > > > I wrote a little program that opens /dev/ad2s1e > > [...] > > I'm not sure whether my approach is correct. > > src/tools/tools/find-sb > ls -d /usr/ports/sysutils/*ffs* Thanks. But...

finding alternate superblocks in ffs

2004-10-31 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Yesterday a major desaster happened: I stumbled across the power cable of my Dell Inspiron notebook. The notebook fell to the floor. FreeBSD was running at that time. Nothing seemed to got damaged, just a palm rest popped off. Ah yes, the HD bay sprung off and in a moment of reflex I pushed it in

Re: off topic - disk crash

2004-03-14 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 01:42:18PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > >the whole image including partition table so that I will not have to > >scan the disk for the start of the filesystems. > > Dont get another DTLA/AVER IBM disk, you will ju

Re: off topic - disk crash

2004-03-14 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 12:25:02PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > >Thanks for all the helpful tips so far. It is a DLTA 307045 (3.5") > >Don't know whether this is a 75GXP. > > It is one of the dreaded models experience shows that

Re: off topic - disk crash

2004-03-14 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 03:58:16PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Today an important (no backup of course) 46 GB IBM Deskstar > > > IDE disk crashed. > > This specific line of drives is infamous for a failure rate that's at > > least a full ord

Unix turns 0x40000000 !

2004-01-10 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
Something for us all to smile or to celebrate! |Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:16:28 + (GMT) |From: Scott Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Subject: Unix turns 0x4000 ! | |In just over 26 hours (Sun Jan 11 00:37:04 2004 GMT to be exact) UNIX |will bust through the 11 (bina

Re: total hang when cu -l /dev/cuaa0

2003-10-04 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:04:22PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : You need a different driver for your PCI one - e.g. puc. > > actually, puc still uses sio/uart. puc just manages the bus > resources. So pu

Re: total hang when cu -l /dev/cuaa0

2003-10-04 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:36:29PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > The modem coild also be something proprietary for which there is no > > > driver available. > > > > > > > When I run getty (or mgetty) on that port or when I do a cu -l /dev/cuaa0 > > > > the system freezes. > > > > > > Why do yo

Re: total hang when cu -l /dev/cuaa0

2003-10-03 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:15:08PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:21:28PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote: > > > > > > I have disabled the SIO on my ASUS P4SX board because I have a PCI modem > > card inserted. But the modem card or the sio on it doesn't seem to be detected > >

Re: setting CMOS clock

2003-06-06 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:31:01AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 05), Christoph Kukulies said: > > I'm using a cron job to synchronize time against a timeserver in a > > local network. The timeserver is a NT box that has a DCF77 clock > > attached. > > > > I chose rdate (/usr

Re: le0 - DE203 kernel config problem

2003-04-03 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:48:26AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > This should fix it: > > ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/if_le.patch This patch worked. It makes the interface configurable and I'd bet make it work after I have configured my firewall. One thing: The patch does not pas

Re: le0 - DE203 kernel config problem

2003-04-03 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:27:37AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > > It seems that whenever the device is properly probed and being used, the > > panic occurs. > > > > I can supply more panic data, if you want. > &

Re: le0 - DE203 kernel config problem

2003-04-03 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:27:43PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I tried to get a DE203 NIC (ISA) working with 5.0R. > ... > > Since I forgot how the card was programmed I tried and got it > > probed at io=0x200 > ... > > Any clues how to proceed

Re: le0 - DE203 kernel config problem

2003-04-02 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:27:43PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I tried to get a DE203 NIC (ISA) working with 5.0R. > ... > > Since I forgot how the card was programmed I tried and got it > > probed at io=0x200 > ... > > Any clues how to proceed