On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 10:11 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor tree, but did
ation,
acceptance, application support, etc. and I admit there should be a
summary of that on the wiki but isn't yet as some of the things only
very last-weekishly materialized for real for us.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bi
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans,
proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot
remember Simon got an answer for.
I gave a clear answer. If there are any
ecurity support side, which I cannot
remember Simon got an answer for.
I continue to say that I am not willing to trade one for another
for the sake of just changing the name.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin fo
On 7. Jul 2012, at 23:45 , Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/07/2012 16:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 7. Jul 2012, at 23:17 , Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Other than authoritative DNS, what features does unbound lack that you want?
>>
>> DNS64 as a start.
>
> Personal
#x27;s a weak +1 for keeping something
> in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a second or third
> tier argument at best.
The real reason you want exactly these tools in base is that otherwise you
end up rewriting tiny parts of freebsd-update etc that actually depen
On 7. Jul 2012, at 23:17 , Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/07/2012 14:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> On 3. Jul 2012, at 12:39 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>
>>> Doug Barton writes:
>>>> The correct solution to this problem is to remove BIND from the base
y far the easiest but the integration into various
parts of the system is harder.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-hacker
if (!jail_allow_renice)
> + return (EPERM);
I think sysctls are a bad idea given jails have per-jail flags these days.
Maybe also only allow re-nicing to be nicer but not less nice?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
n IRQ,
> but em0 is completely unused was starting to prove there is some strong
> evidence here in favor of the interrupts issue.
>
> Dane, what's the status on your end? Has your fix still been successful? Is
> it also stable if you simply set hint.mpt.0.msi_enable="1
wever once a packet is sent, the page fault occurs.
> This does not happen when aesni is disabled. I have a core dump, the
> text of which is attached to this email.
>
> Should I file a PR for this? Thanks.
>
Sure it's aesni related?
kern/164400 ?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
boot
> client and any other tftp clients that might check options without actually
> starting a transfer. Anyone opposed to removing it? (A proposed patch is
> at http://people.freebsd.org/~emaste/tftpd.diff).
Rather than completely ignoring it, can we log it in a different
/build_option_survey_20120106/
Special thanks go to np, sbruno and bhaga for bringing worm back to life.
/bz
PS: the last run from 2010 can still be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/build_option_survey_20100104/
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It
On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 10. Jan 2012, at 20:32 , Paul A. Procacci wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:12:17PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>>> Is there a way to find out the default FIB number of a
but even that's hard...
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
here other ways to relibly test for listening services on any port
for a given ip address?
get the pid and use a cross-check on the process; there is no easy
way do it otherwise currently unless you write your own extensions
needing kvm.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have
o support that exact chip.
Probably needs some special initialization and a couple of if ()s, as
usual.
LSI/Dell are the people to talk to.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/
man/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handb
t here is a patch to clean it.
- remove SYSCTL_DECL(_net_inet6_ip6) and SYSCTL_DECL(_net_inet6) from c files
+ add them to netinet6/in6_var.h header (like for netinet).
Yeah, that's a different thing.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hey,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> I think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
BAZ> seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMA
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hey,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> I think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
BAZ> seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMAGE
BAZ> freebsd-virtualization might be better.
think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMAGE
freebsd-virtualization might be better.
What you could try is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100216-10-ft-cv.diff
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new
though.
In case it'll help you or someone else I just put it online:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100807-02-wd-fintek-f71882fg.diff
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb This signature is about you not me.___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, alan yang wrote:
Hey,
Wonder people had implemented interface to import / export flowtable.
what exactly do you want to accomplish with that?
--
Bjoern A. ZeebFrom August on I will have a life. It's now up to you
to do the maths and count to 64. -- Bo
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/07/2010 11:29 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Hey,
Proposed patch skips zero sized sections without going into trouble of
allocating section entry (progtab), doing zero-sized memory allocs and
copies
+ if (shdr[i].sh_size == 0)
+ continue;
switch (shdr[i].sh_type) {
case SHT_PROGBITS:
case SHT_NOBITS:
--
Bjoern A. ZeebFrom August on I will have a life. It's now up to you
to do the maths and count t
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, sn_ wrote:
The patch fixes a small typo in the icmp6_error comment. It's called 'Packet
Too Big'. (synched from openbsd)
Fixed.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7.
Thoughts?
INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL?
Well, I was
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7.
Thoughts?
INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing
id_interface="bge0"
jail_squid_ip="192.168.177.62/32"
jail_squid_ip_multi0="192.168.177.63/32"
jail_squid_ip_multi1="em0|192.168.177.62/32"
Below is a patch against HEAD to document the $interface|$ip syntax.
That wasn't done on
fect that you want by using
a simple one-ip jail and writing firewall rules to redirect traffic into it,
and NAT traffic coming out of it.
Using firewall NAT with jails is something I often see and usually
never understand unless people only have a single IP and want to share
that between lots of
s you can see, I removed the ifconfig_em0_alias0 line. If you want
to keep that and mix things then you could do:
jail_squid_ip="bge0|192.168.177.62/32"
jail_squid_ip_multi0="192.168.176.62/32"
again without the jail_squid_interface=".." line.
HTH
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Merijn Verstraaten wrote:
My apologies if these are the wrong lists for this sort of thing but it was
unclear to me where else to go with additions like this.
You may try freebsd-jail@
Make sure to get a review from simon@ for this.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It
he KLD to begin with.
Right. The problem here is a bug with ld and linker sets and size and
aligment calculations the the elf section is started when not all of
this is known correctly and it's not fixed later. This came up with
that "netisr" bug where we had seen the misalignment of the
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 13 September 2009 18:58:02 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hi,
With the recent changes to /etc/rc.d for network start-up. I was
wondering what is now correct. The previously working ipv6
- route ${_action} -inet6 ${route_args}
+ route ${_action} -inet6 ${ipv6_route_args}
done
fi
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again?
___
freebsd-hacke
be 1 either.
I fixed tools/regressions/priv the other day; maybe this helps a bit
as well:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/tools/regression/priv/main.c?r1=173679&r2=196172
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again?
_
02 has been rather late in terms of sendmail and resolver
etc. What had started to cause those problems?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
e tree anymore and it has been done by
others already (for you - and others;).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/128030
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
me to a working multi-ip jail patch?
freebsd-jail@ would be a better list.
I would happily point you at one but my webserver is down at the
moment. I hope you can waut anther few days as I am swamped...
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert co
on this but slightly different topic.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
infrastructure of
addresses, routing, interfaces, etc?
Hi Robert,
ISDN is very simple. In the ISDN world there is a term called TEI which is the
Terminal Entity Identifier. This kind of like an IP address.
Terminal Endpoint Identifier ...
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
D
Giving more details would depend on a subtype which is dependend
on the event.
What we's really need is someone with the specs to write the
code and add the printfs, etc.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware s
e box.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke
the
thing that would best fit for our tree.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
/lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2003-August/000225.html
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to use IPv4 and IPv6 in a same jail? Or do I have to
write a listening daemon that acts as a "proxy" that runs in the host?
jails do not (yet) support IPv6. I hope to be working on that again by
the end of the week.
--
Bjoe
orking;) but I don't think there is anything
BSD related...
Considering OFW, Sun released that under a 3 clause BSD license somewhen
last year imho.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
arch.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
much unsure what andre is up to beyond what pjd has
(and only needs to be updated to HEAD [I have a local patch for that
in case anyone is interested]).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freeb
d not find any
sockets or processes for them after some seconds) - at least
it should be that way...
See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebs
tp://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
en re-written already.
I have to check if the entire code path could be MFCed or just your
change needs to be applied but it'll has to wait until after
6.2-RELEASE. I do not want to break any other (edge) case there just
before the release and I guess re@ wouldn't want me to either;)
/bz
--
27;ll add a reference to the PR.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, David Gilbert wrote:
I read in the if_tun manpage that it supports SIOCSIFADDR (such that
it works with ifconfig). I like examples, so I search the ifconfig
source code for SIOCSIFADDR. None. Then I search the entire source
tree
really want. Look at ppp sources for examples
for example.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any
ue please consider freebsd-chat or
freebsd-advocacy.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send a
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
> Using freeBsd 5.3.
...
> Maybe one of you guys can shed some light on this for me.
please update to RELENG_5; it's fixed there already:)
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabba
one shed any light on this one?
depends on which version you are using.
you could try
ifconfig gif0 create
and see what happens.
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gordon David wrote:
> That's the point. I do not want the userland program to check /dev/fooctl
> from time to time. I want the kernel to notify the userland program
> instead. So how shall I do it? Maybe linker_load_file is a better way.
man 2 kqueue ?
--
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Viktor Ivanov wrote:
> count is too high. And sometimes I need to see quickly what a
> colleague have done to the firewall and why it's not working as
> expected.
use rcs or cvs for tracking changes
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Za
/CHD/) {
s/CHD \d+ //;
print $_;
}
}
# End;
--- cut ---
Gives me s.th. like this:
Apr 28 16:30:35: incoming call from NotAvailable to 41 ctrl 3
or
Apr 28 17:23:30: incoming call from 01234567890 to 41 ctrl 3
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb a
going to run on a UP machine ?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
ds to
inconsistency.
Is there any chance that the whole source tree could be built w/o
/usr/include/** ?
or should that be the case already ?
or why can't it be done ?
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.za
t feel too lucky with this solution.
Some best practice examples - or did I miss an article ?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma
to docs on this topics would help me.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
.
> Here's one of the many press releases that a google search turned up:
>
> http://www.daemon.org/bsd-releases/misc/USL-lawsuit
and here is the other:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/bsdi/bsdisuit.htm
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb
that show the in kernel packet
flow/processing ?
Perhaps the doc project would also be happy to include it in the
handbook or somewhere else. Would make life much more easier for many
people.
TIA
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 6
me) of the (other) jail patches in HEAD ?
What about jail-ng ?
[ Perhaps take this discussion to -current ? ]
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
also please update the manpage(s) ? ;-)
--
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
--- ./sys/kern/kern_jail.c.orig Mon Feb 3 12:57:06 2003
+++ ./sys/kern/kern_jail.c Tue Feb
71 matches
Mail list logo
