On Sun, 30 May 2010 16:36:45 +0300, Erik Cederstrand
wrote:
Andrius, would it make sense to create e.g. a wiki page tracking the status and
current known problems with compiling ports with clang? Just like there's a
wiki page ClangBSD status.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang
It doesn't
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:58:05 +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko
wrote:
1. __dso not found after link. Some symbols seems to be omitted from
libraries and linking of plugins fails badly.
Known problem with known fix.
2. Assembler errors. Xorg has some in x11-servers/xorg-server
x11-drivers/xf86-video-
On Mon, 03 May 2010 15:34:43 +0300, C. Bergström
wrote:
What fancy stuff is in the ports tree which clang will take advantage of?
I wasn't talking about any specific port. What I meant is that new hardware
won't stop coming out just because FreeBSD decided not to update their gcc.
New CPUs may
On Mon, 03 May 2010 14:27:52 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
For me, the project that makes sense is exactly "making freebsd ports
work with clang", instead of what many have read "making applications
ported to freebsd and compiled with clang work". Please note the subtle
but very important differ
On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:07 +0300, C. Bergström
wrote:
I can understand from a commercial perspective why having a permissive
licensed production compiler could be good.. I can understand why many
people don't like gcc or fsf, but what does the BSD community get?
1) Performance?
2) Robustness
On Sun, 02 May 2010 23:17:00 +0300, Eitan Adler
wrote:
Good - and those 30% of ports will help improve clang++ even more.
Some probably will, we submit a lot of bug reports for clang/llvm.
Hopefully over time that number will increase to 100% and we will be
able to say goodbye to gcc for goo
On Sun, 02 May 2010 10:25:22 +0300, Yuri wrote:
Having tried clang++ I have a feeling that it's not quite ready to be a
generic c++ compiler.
It crashes a lot, fails on many quite simple c++ patterns.
The current state of clang doesn't bother me too much. I'm aware of its
limitations, but I'm
Hi,
I'm Andrius Morkūnas from Lithuania. My Summer of Code proposal was accepted
this year and be working on my project, which is to make clang and ports to
be friendly with each other.
My main goals are:
* Create an easy way to set ports compiler to either clang or gcc (and no,
CC=cla
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0200, Mario Lobo wrote:
Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm?
I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang.
Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports?
ClangBSD had little to no runtime testing, so you
9 matches
Mail list logo
