ystems. I think that, for cohesiveness and sanity, all
filesystems should be mounted at the same time, with the mount script
simply calling `mount -a`. Otherwise, we have to wory about mount-var.sh
and mount-rest.sh.
If we want to mount pccard stuff from fstab, we should do something like
the smbfs scrip
lows us to start, say, nfsd.sh, knowing full well that
mountd is running, without worrying about some dependency checker trying
to start a new mountd.
This is a relatively minor issue, and I am sure there are a million
equally valid (or more so) solutions to the problem. This is why I leave
it to th
few months since I looked at the NetBSD stuff, it
> too has a single rc.conf-like file to control things. Its main
> feature is that you can add new "modules" easily.
>
> Warner
New "modules"? Isn't that just the same as /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ ? I side
wit
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:15:00AM -0700, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> I will commit it. Please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] too.
>
> Jean-Marc
Thanks a lot, I have just submitted the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
unctions to see what could be wrong," I would
have saved loads of time.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:35:06AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> The solution is to comment out the calls to I810BindGARTMemory() and
> I810UnbindGARTMemory() in the VT-switching functions. The end result is
> that I810EnterVT() and I810LeaveVT() are now identical in 4.1.0 to the
> o
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:32:50AM -0500, Andrew Hesford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The XFree86 4.0.1 sources *did* offer a helpful hint. I have posted
> > another email which includes a patch to fix the bu
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:20:45PM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> I hope somebody can provide more information. I am in the process of
> fetching and extracting the XFree86 4.0.1 sources, I will take a look at
> how they handled the ioctl. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about
> t
.0.1 sources, I will take a look at
how they handled the ioctl. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about
the design of the FreeBSD kernel to go poking in there; if XFree86 4.0.1
can't offer some hints on the right way to handle things, I'm fresh out
of ideas.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PR
to execute
> > external commands.
> It would also be essential for running for example a Linux OpenSSH daemon
> in a jail with Linux binaries. That would be a very good thing... :)
>
Why would that be a good thing? Run the FreeBSD OpenSSH in a jail.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTE
ave to remember that there IS a chance you will toast things.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
floppy, and has a windowing system and at least a web
browser.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
gt; beastie_saver.ko load green_saver.ko (and possibly unload itself) after a
> specified delay?
>
> G`luck,
> Torbjorn Kristoffersen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
THAT'S an idea. I would love to see some fancy screensaver put to good
use, as long as I know that it will eventuall
onitor after 15 minutes. Other screensavers are really just for
entertainment; I think green_saver is the only one that serves a really
good purpose.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
gramming software
> freely available.
Ugh. I think we need a better solution than the Xilinx software. It's
absolutely horrible. They should stick to electronics and leave the
software design to those who know what they're doing.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 08:01:20AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> > I do see both synchronous writes and asynchronous writes on my
> > filesystem (as reported by mount); what are these?
>
> Th
a way that led
me to believ he wasn't using it, so I'm comparing async I/O to the I/O
performance he would see.
So I guess we can see that I understand a good portion of how soft
updates works in theory, but I've never bothered to learn how all this
allows data to be written to disk...
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ork operating at
a raw 9Mbits/sec is going to be slower in real-world transfer rates,
because transfer protocols have overhead, breaking data into packets and
reassembling it takes time, and other things.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
lpha and Itanium (ideally,
major focus should be put on UltraSPARC and PPC, too), and leave the
x86-64 porting to people who actually care.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
can
> mount the first one fine with mount_ext2fs, but i can't figure out if,
> or how, i can mount the larger one.
>
> Does anyone have any insight?
Use the slice number equal to the partition number in linux. For
instace, if Linux saw the disk as sdb6, use da1s6 in FreeBSD.
This wil
of the structure of audio CDs. Any help
would be greatly appreciated, and I would, of course, submit any patches
I make.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:26:30PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrew Hesford writes:
> : Hrm... I'm sorry then. I have no idea why the Handbook asks you to zero
> : out the device, it consumes a lot of time and really isn't necessary. I
&g
t
the disk in your FreeBSD box, and edit the existing MBR with the FreeBSD
fdisk.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Then run
disklabel like the walkthrough says.
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ch means it was pre-FreeBSD (indeed, even
pre-Linux!), but the main focus is 4.3BSD, which makes many aspects
still relevant. I am finding it to be an interesting read. It does some
comparison between Xenix, SunOS, BSD UNIX and System V (releases 3 and
4).
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Uns
ngled, and I like the way things are done
now. For instance, take the partitioning process. If the average Windows
user is too clueless to format a hard disk partition, imagine the same
person trying to edit the master boot record using fdisk, and then
creating a disklabel for a new slice. But I like h
grams are divided logically.
There's 17 reasons for you. I'd come up with more, but I'd need to close
this vim session or open up another ssh connection to hunt around for
things I like. Besides, isn't this message too damn long?
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ut don't submit a message to multiple lists at
one time.
Furthermore, this question is not appropriate for freebsd-hackers. This
list is meant for people with bug notices, programming suggestions, and
code to discuss. freebsd-questions is for questions about the basic
operation of FreeBSD.
--
28 matches
Mail list logo