Re: [RFC] Enabling invariant TSC timecounter on SMP

2011-06-02 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/06/2011 23:55 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > Yes, it's still a work-in-progress. However, I thought it is good > enough for 9.0 inclusion. BTW, the latest patch is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/tsc_smp_test5.diff > > FYI, the only meaningful change from the previous versio

USENIX BoF

2011-06-02 Thread Ali Mashtizadeh
Hello Everyone, I was wondering if anyone is planning to put together a FreeBSD BoF at USENIX this year? Thanks, -- Ali Mashtizadeh ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, s

some strange constructs (bugs?) in if_tun.c

2011-06-02 Thread Martin Birgmeier
I am looking at net/if_tun.c, function tunwrite() (this is 7.4, but 8.2 is nearly the same): There is a local variable "error" which is initialized to zero and then seemingly never changed, until it is used as a return value if m_uiotombuf() fails: ... int error = 0; ...

Re: Bug in ksched_setscheduler?

2011-06-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:42:42 pm Dmitry Krivenok wrote: > Hello Hackers, > I think I found a bug in ksched_setscheduler() function. > > 209 rtp.prio = > p4prio_to_rtpprio(param->sched_priority); > > Shouldn't we use p4prio_to_tsprio instead of p4prio_to_rtpprio at t

Re: compiling ports with SSP (was: [PATCH] Add -lssp_nonshared to GCC's LIB_SPEC unconditionally)=

2011-06-02 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:47:23PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Kostik, > > Thanks to b.f., I've been reminded that this patch has yet to be > committed :). > > As a reminder, here are the archive pointers to the discussion: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-August/03