Re: ps "time" field jumps backward

2010-02-05 Thread Linda Messerschmidt
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > Ideally, top and ps would total up all > the per-thread CPU counts when displaying the per-process numbers, but it > doesn't seem to. It does seem to total them: $ ps axHo pid,lwp,time,wchan,comm | awk '$1 == 1647' 1647 100401 0:00.63 select

Re: ps "time" field jumps backward

2010-02-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 05), Linda Messerschmidt said: > For most of 7.2, on up to a 7.3-PRERELEASE built yesterday, I've noticed > that the "time" field reported by ps and top jumps around for some > processes. I've particularly noticed it with MySQL. > > Here are some repeated ps results (ps a

Re: our little daemon abused as symbol of the evil

2010-02-05 Thread Kirk McKusick
I have gotten word from the authors that they are aware of the problem and are correcting it (e.g., taking out the daemon). Kirk McKusick =-=-=-= From:Engin Kirda Date:Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:03:49 +0100 To: mckus...@mckusick.com Subject: BSD logo misuse Cc: Gilbert Wondrac

Re: our little daemon abused as symbol of the evil

2010-02-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Kirk, Christoph, Hackers, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Kirk McKusick wrote: > > Thanks for the pointer. As you note, the damage (or benefit :-) is > > done. Still I have sent an email to the editor at Spiegel notifying > > them of my copyright in the hopes that they will at least ask in the > >

ps "time" field jumps backward

2010-02-05 Thread Linda Messerschmidt
Hi all, For most of 7.2, on up to a 7.3-PRERELEASE built yesterday, I've noticed that the "time" field reported by ps and top jumps around for some processes. I've particularly noticed it with MySQL. Here are some repeated ps results (ps axo pid,time,wchan,comm) for the same process over a few m

Re: devfs panic w/INVARIANTS

2010-02-05 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:51:25AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: I've got a commercial driver that uses device cloning. At unload time, the driver calls clone_cleanup(). When I unload

Re: devfs panic w/INVARIANTS

2010-02-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:51:25AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > >>I've got a commercial driver that uses device cloning. > >>At unload time, the driver calls clone_cleanup(). When I unload > >>the driver

Re: devfs panic w/INVARIANTS

2010-02-05 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: I've got a commercial driver that uses device cloning. At unload time, the driver calls clone_cleanup(). When I unload the driver when the kernel is built with INVARIANTS, I'll see a panic in devfs_populate_l

Re: Weekend PR smashing

2010-02-05 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:09:48AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > Reports that are duplicates indicate that various users are being affected > by one underlying problem. At one point I was trying to gather them all > into a page. I was hoping more people would do the analysis and send me > addition

Re: [PATCH] Support for thresholds in du(1)

2010-02-05 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (04/02/2010 23:24), jhell wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:55, gleb.kurtsou@ wrote: > > On (25/02/2009 17:24), Mel wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> attached is a small patch to add threshold support to du(1). I've been > >> using > >> it on 7-STABLE machines for a while, cause I got tired of the nois

Re: devfs panic w/INVARIANTS

2010-02-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > I've got a commercial driver that uses device cloning. > At unload time, the driver calls clone_cleanup(). When I unload > the driver when the kernel is built with INVARIANTS, I'll see a > panic in devfs_populate_loop(). This happe