Trever wrote:
> I noticed in 7.2 that the /usr/src installed from the ISO downloads
> would not build without first sup'ing for a few updates.
> (disc1.iso's)
>
> I notice in the 8.0RC2&3 that some of the source files are corrupted.
Can you be precise in what's going wrong? What objects can't be
Trever wrote:
> I noticed in 7.2 that the /usr/src installed from the ISO downloads would not
> build without first sup'ing for a few updates. (disc1.iso's)
>
> I notice in the 8.0RC2&3 that some of the source files are corrupted.
>
> Not a media issue, checksum's have always been confirmed good.
I noticed in 7.2 that the /usr/src installed from the ISO downloads would not
build without first sup'ing for a few updates. (disc1.iso's)
I notice in the 8.0RC2&3 that some of the source files are corrupted.
Not a media issue, checksum's have always been confirmed good.
Is this normal, for th
I've been scratching my head all day on an issue that's been frustrating.
I've got two FreeBSD 6.2 instances installed on two M600 blades, and am
moving to a new datacenter with M600 blades and trying to install FreeBSD
7.2 or 8. But as others on this list and elsewhere have mentioned,
seemingly
Hi,
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:18:49 -0500
> Garrett Wollman said:
wollman> Index: inet/inet_cidr_pton.c
wollman> ===
wollman> --- inet/inet_cidr_pton.c (revision 199242)
wollman> +++ inet/inet_cidr_pton.c (working c
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:18:49AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> If you have a moment, please take a look at the following patch. It
> contains some very minor fixes to various parts of libc which were
> found by the clang static analyzer. They fall into a few categories:
> 1) Bug fixes in ver
On Thursday 12 November 2009 9:08:35 pm Sean Hamilton wrote:
> Greetings -hackers,
>
> I have two unrelated questions.
>
> First, what is the status of NUMA support in FreeBSD? Is
> there a performance penalty on Nehalem-class systems,
> compared with Linux, which advertises NUMA awareness? Googl
If you have a moment, please take a look at the following patch. It
contains some very minor fixes to various parts of libc which were
found by the clang static analyzer. They fall into a few categories:
1) Bug fixes in very rare situations (mostly error-handling code that
has probably never bee
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:08:35 -0800
Sean Hamilton wrote:
> Second, I am using a FreeBSD server to talk to equipment
> which has a GPRS internet connection. This is fairly high
> latency (approximately one second RTT) and is prone to
> bursts of packet loss, or bursts of extremely high latency
> --
9 matches
Mail list logo
