> > > OS X Leopard has the same bug ...
> >
> > How did you test it in Leopard? I tried it in Tiger, intending
> > to contribute another data point, and I got:
>
> Leopard's /bin/date accepts -j. You can try compiling FreeBSD
> date on Tiger.
I had decided against that, since it would propagate
> > OS X Leopard has the same bug ...
>
> How did you test it in Leopard? I tried it in Tiger, intending to
> contribute another data point, and I got:
Leopard's /bin/date accepts -j. You can try compiling FreeBSD
date on Tiger.
___
freebsd-hackers@fr
> $ sh <<'EOF'
> for a in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
> do
> date -j -f %s `expr 1194163200 + 600 \* $a`
> done
> EOF
> OS X Leopard has the same bug ...
How did you test it in Leopard? I tried it in Tiger, intending to
contribute another data point, and I got:
date: illegal option -- j
$ sh <<'EOF'
for a in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
do
date -j -f %s `expr 1194163200 + 600 \* $a`
done
EOF
Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 PDT 2007
Sun Nov 4 01:10:00 PDT 2007
Sun Nov 4 01:20:00 PDT 2007
Sun Nov 4 01:30:00 PST 2007 <---
Sun Nov 4 01:40:00 PST 2007 <---
Sun Nov 4 01:50:00 PST 2007 <---
Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> Rather than the marginal HW part, it seems, for me, closely related to
> MB/BIOS (as well (Alexander apperently has about the same setup as I
> have for this test)):
>
[...]
>
> I vaguely remember from another PR that the Promise card does
> something with PCI-bursti
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:16:59PM -0500, M E wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
Hello,
I'm Cc'ing hackers@ in my reply to your mail so people can
overhear this conversation. It would be great to get some help.
> I am able to get "will wake on: magic", when typing "ifconfig" in
> FreeNAS (built on FreeBSD);
Hi,
pkg_add -rK seems not to keep the packages dependencies so as the
package itself.
i found this:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugbusters/2006-August/000178.html
but no answer since then.
I don't if this is a bug, or not even implemented feature?
Thanks alot
--
System Programm
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:41:10PM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
>I need semtimedop(2). I'm thinking I can just do a semop with a SIGINT maybe.
I presume you mean SIGALRM.
>Can someone suggest a good method for setting up a timer to deliver
>the signal? What sort of timers does FreeBSD offer?
As
Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
Alexander Sabourenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello.
I have ported the workaround for the hardware bug that causes data
corruption on Promise SATA300 TX4 cards to RELENG_7.
Bug description:
SATA300 TX4 hardware chokes if last PRD entry (in a dma transfer
9 matches
Mail list logo
