Re: SoC

2007-05-16 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Rick C. Petty wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:41:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, fair enough. But there's a lot of overhead involved with Java with their completely OOP view on programming. Agreed. Also, although I know that many database solutions companies

Re: SoC

2007-05-16 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Rick C. Petty wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:08:03AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: Sorry for all you Java lovers out there.. it's just that from where I'm at I don't see anyone using it in the workplace (Intel). We're all using C/C++/Perl, with occasional spots of Ruby/P

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

2007-05-16 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 09:32:37 Chris wrote: > On 16/05/07, Marko Zec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 14 May 2007 22:47:57 Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Ed Schouten wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > >

Re: SoC

2007-05-16 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:08:03AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Sorry for all you Java lovers out there.. it's just that from where I'm > at I don't see anyone using it in the workplace (Intel). We're all using > C/C++/Perl, with occasional spots of Ruby/Python. We use Java almost exclusive

Re: System Drops to manual mount root prompt after HDD duplication

2007-05-16 Thread David Cramblett
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Beats me... I can't even remember what userconfig_script is supposed to do. Note that support for 5.2.1 ended on July 31, 2004. Neither can I, but last weekend I upgrade

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

2007-05-16 Thread Andre Oppermann
Chris wrote: On 16/05/07, Marko Zec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OTOH, even if we miss the window for sneaking this into 7.0-R, it would be a huge pitty not to at least reserve a few additional fields in various kernel structures needed to support stack virtualization. That way it would be possib

Re: Accounting test data

2007-05-16 Thread Eric Anderson
On 05/16/07 08:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2007, Diomidis Spinellis wrote: I'm testing the backwards compatibility of the process accounting processing tools (sa(8) and lastcomm(1)) with the upcoming new acct(5) record format. If you have root access on a FreeBSD AMD64, Sparc64, i

Re: Accounting test data

2007-05-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Diomidis Spinellis wrote: I'm testing the backwards compatibility of the process accounting processing tools (sa(8) and lastcomm(1)) with the upcoming new acct(5) record format. If you have root access on a FreeBSD AMD64, Sparc64, ia64, or PowerPC machine please run the sh

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

2007-05-16 Thread Chris
On 16/05/07, Marko Zec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 14 May 2007 22:47:57 Andre Oppermann wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Ed Schouten wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> * Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a "l

Re: Accounting test data

2007-05-16 Thread Carl Johan Gustavsson
Diomidis Spinellis wrote: > I'm testing the backwards compatibility of the process accounting > processing tools (sa(8) and lastcomm(1)) with the upcoming new acct(5) > record format. If you have root access on a FreeBSD AMD64, Sparc64, > ia64, or PowerPC machine please run the shell script > http

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

2007-05-16 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 14 May 2007 22:47:57 Andre Oppermann wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Ed Schouten wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> * Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a "light" variant of multi-IPv[46] per jail. It >

Re: Accounting test data

2007-05-16 Thread Eric Anderson
On 05/16/07 02:35, Diomidis Spinellis wrote: I'm testing the backwards compatibility of the process accounting processing tools (sa(8) and lastcomm(1)) with the upcoming new acct(5) record format. If you have root access on a FreeBSD AMD64, Sparc64, ia64, or PowerPC machine please run the shel

GDB and memory violations

2007-05-16 Thread Pietro Cerutti
Hi list, I haven't investigated yet, but it seems that FreeBSD's version of GDB stores string literals in read/write memory, and not on read-only memory, as I prove below. Is this behavior known/wanted/erroneous ? Try to run this code from the command line and from inside GDB. strtok(3) segfaults

Accounting test data

2007-05-16 Thread Diomidis Spinellis
I'm testing the backwards compatibility of the process accounting processing tools (sa(8) and lastcomm(1)) with the upcoming new acct(5) record format. If you have root access on a FreeBSD AMD64, Sparc64, ia64, or PowerPC machine please run the shell script http://www.spinellis.gr/FreeBSD/valu