On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:05:48PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as
> >recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work).
>
> ifconfig re0 me
On 08/16/06 20:37 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
If the media is set to 'none' you couldn't send anything from re(4) as
recent changes checks whether the link is present(Receiver should work).
ifconfig re0 media 10baset or 100baset always returns error, so there
doesn't seem to be anyway
> "Yann" == Yann Berthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yann> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, at 19:59, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Is there anyone actively working on openospfd (the port)?
Yann>I ended up taking a snapshot of openospf at that time and
Yann> removing all route labels reference to compile
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:03:35PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/06 19:09 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
> >really sucks and need much more CPU power to saturate the link.
> >So I don't think it's good idea to make rl(4) serve 8139C+.
>
> perhaps, but re(4) doesn't work at
Download: http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/linux_aio-20060817.tar.bz2
Let my patch set keep up with new Linuxolator.
From Beijing, China
Divacky Roman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at
Tony Maher wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
On 08/16/06 00:49, Tobias Roth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:26:13PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Does the ifdef in the struct dirent (pasted in below) make any sense?
Seems like regardless of whether the __BSD_VISIBLE is defined or not,
the d_name l
Eric Anderson wrote:
> On 08/16/06 00:49, Tobias Roth wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:26:13PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> Does the ifdef in the struct dirent (pasted in below) make any sense?
>>> Seems like regardless of whether the __BSD_VISIBLE is defined or not,
>>> the d_name len
Hello,
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, at 19:59, David Gilbert wrote:
> Is there anyone actively working on openospfd (the port)?
>
> There are systemic things like the fact they want to ignore lo0
> destined routes (although I know how to patch that), but there are
> less obvious things that I havn't
Ok, I've finally done it.
The module itself is located at http://mbsd.msk.ru/dist/msr-0.1.tar.bz2
port - http://mbsd.msk.ru/dist/devmsr.tar.bz2
Port PR - ports/102158
Now we can use x86info to get all available information about cpu.
I could not test amd64 and smp version, so any information
(su
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:45:05PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 11:31 AM -0500 8/16/06, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >
> >My point was, that either path you take (if BSD_VISIBLE is
> >defined or not), you end up with d_name having a size of
> >255 + 1, so what's the point the having it at all?
>
On 08/16/06 13:45, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 11:31 AM -0500 8/16/06, Eric Anderson wrote:
My point was, that either path you take (if BSD_VISIBLE is
defined or not), you end up with d_name having a size of
255 + 1, so what's the point the having it at all?
To make it clear that d_name is tie
At 11:31 AM -0500 8/16/06, Eric Anderson wrote:
My point was, that either path you take (if BSD_VISIBLE is
defined or not), you end up with d_name having a size of
255 + 1, so what's the point the having it at all?
To make it clear that d_name is tied to the exact value
of MAXNAMLEN (just in c
On 08/16/06 00:49, Tobias Roth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:26:13PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Does the ifdef in the struct dirent (pasted in below) make any sense?
Seems like regardless of whether the __BSD_VISIBLE is defined or not,
the d_name length will always be 255 + 1.
Eric
str
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:51:04PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/06 17:22 Dinesh Nair said the following:
> >
> >i've got a single board computer with VIA C3 Samuel 2, 256MB RAM and 4
> >onboard Realtek 8139C+ NICs. I'm attempting to get FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
> >working on them,
Jason Evans wrote:
(LI Xin) wrote:
2006-08-15 02:38 +0300ladimir Kushnir>>> On -CURENT amd64 (Athlon64 3000+, 512k
L2 cache):
With jemalloc (without MY_MALLOS):
~/fdtd> /usr/bin/time ./fdtd.FreeBSD 500 500 1000
...
116.34 real 113.69 user 0.00 sys
With MY_MALLOC:
~/fdtd> /
15 matches
Mail list logo
