--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
>
> It may still be worth trying. I only started looking at `umem' from
> sourceforge this week, but if there is more interest in ptmalloc,
> maybe it is better if I focused on why ptmalloc fails to work on
> FreeBSD.
>
FWIW, I just sub
On 2006-06-02 16:44, Jason Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article
>> would've been much more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in
>> the ports tree) and we had had libumem.
>
> Yes, that would have been nice, bu
2 matches
Mail list logo
