Re: Puzzled about turnstile's lock

2005-12-17 Thread prime
On 12/18/05, rookie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi hackers, > > I want to understand the current implementation of > > turnstile,and meet some questions about its locks' logicality. > > > [snip] > > It's used to lock td_contested member of struct thread structure and all > issues linked to it

Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread Gilbert Fernandes
> FFS == UFS. The FreeBSD UFS is the FFS accessed through the VFS layer, but basically the format is the same. If you want to have access, from FreeBSD, to NetBSD partitions, make sure the NetBSD partitions have been formated using FFSv2 which is the port of UFS to NetBSD. There are some differenc

Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Dec 17 at 20:07, Mathieu Arnold spoke: > +-Le 17/12/2005 18:10 +0100, Hanspeter Roth a dit : > | On Dec 17 at 14:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke: > | > |> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:20:06PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > |> > > |> > is it possible to access Fast Filesystems from a NetBSD inst

Re: Puzzled about turnstile's lock

2005-12-17 Thread rookie
> Hi hackers, > I want to understand the current implementation of > turnstile,and meet some questions about its locks' logicality. [snip] It's used to lock td_contested member of struct thread structure and all issues linked to it (as you can see in the source tree). It seems used in a clean wa

Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+-Le 17/12/2005 18:10 +0100, Hanspeter Roth a dit : | On Dec 17 at 14:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke: | |> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:20:06PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote: |> > |> > is it possible to access Fast Filesystems from a NetBSD installation |> > on the same disk? |> |> As long as they ha

Re: [fbsd] Re[2]: jailctl with multiple ip per jail

2005-12-17 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, Oxy, Daniel, > > yes, i know that, but what i want is to use an existing jail > > with 2ip > > not to create additional jails.. > > although i dont know if it really works, but here is what i was able > to google (check those mijail patches) :) place your questions on pjd@ > > http://garage.

Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Dec 17 at 14:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:20:06PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > > > is it possible to access Fast Filesystems from a NetBSD installation > > on the same disk? > > As long as they have the same Endianess, yes. You might get some > warnings abou

Re: unable to build geom_gate

2005-12-17 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:27:11PM +0700, Vitaliy Ovsyannikov wrote: +> Hello, freebsd-hackers. +> +> Please, look at the output and help if you can: +> +> # tar -yxf geom_gate.tbz +> # cd geom_gate +> # make [...] Why don't you just use ggate from the base system? -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek

Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread joerg
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:20:06PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > is it possible to access Fast Filesystems from a NetBSD installation > on the same disk? As long as they have the same Endianess, yes. You might get some warnings about the disklabel, otherwise it should be fine. Joerg _

accessing NetBSD filesystem

2005-12-17 Thread Hanspeter Roth
Hello, is it possible to access Fast Filesystems from a NetBSD installation on the same disk? -Hanspeter ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT

Re: My wish list for 6.1

2005-12-17 Thread Allen
On Saturday 17 December 2005 03:55, Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:55:00AM +, Allen wrote: > > On 12/17/2005 01:34:09 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > >> > 2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only inst

Re: My wish list for 6.1

2005-12-17 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:55:00AM +, Allen wrote: > On 12/17/2005 01:34:09 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > >> > 2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP > >kernel, for > >> > performance reasons. We should be able

Re: My wish list for 6.1

2005-12-17 Thread Allen
On 12/17/2005 01:34:09 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > 2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP kernel, for > > performance reasons. We should be able to package both a UP and SMP > > kernel into the release bits, and

Puzzled about turnstile's lock

2005-12-17 Thread prime
Hi hackers, I want to understand the current implementation of turnstile,and meet some questions about its locks' logicality. turnstile's ``ts_blocked" field is protected by both ``td_contested" lock and its turnstile_chain lock, but I think its turnstile_chain lock is enough,because we allways ge

Re: My wish list for 6.1

2005-12-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:34:09PM -0800, Avleen Vig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > 2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP kernel, for > > > performance reasons. We should be able to package both a UP and SMP > > > kernel into