On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:18:10PM +0800, Ronnel P. Maglasang wrote:
+> Hello,
+>
+> I think there was already a thread on this. I just
+> want to raise the question again if anyone has successfully
+> booted an gdbe-encrypted filesystem (everything encrypted except
+> the bootloader). The passphr
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your viewpoints. Mine is a bit different:
> - Not everyone wants to build the system, especially the large companies
>that utilize some sort of binary update mechainsm.
Oops, I mean /usr/obj here.
Cheers,
--
Xin L
Hello,
I think there was already a thread on this. I just
want to raise the question again if anyone has successfully
booted an gdbe-encrypted filesystem (everything encrypted except
the bootloader). The passphrase is entered at the bootloader prompt
or embedded in the bootloader.
I appreciate a
Hi, Joerg,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:07:32PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:34PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
> > there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
> > nobody objects.
I've very interested in learning about FreeBSD's implementation of
vfs/buffer cache/fs archicture. I've read through mckusick@'s chapter
in the Design and Implmentation of FreeBSD book, and I've read the UNIX
Filesystems book cover to cover.
What I'd like to see/read/understand, is how FreeBS
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Make sure you patch the right place and _not_ the shared part. Does the
> > attached patch work for you?
>
> Yes, this worked, thank you ! This implies that libssp must be linked
> with -nodefaultlibs option to avoid linking itse
> Make sure you patch the right place and _not_ the shared part. Does the
> attached patch work for you?
Yes, this worked, thank you ! This implies that libssp must be linked
with -nodefaultlibs option to avoid linking itself against libssp. But
this also prevents it from being linked against li
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:34PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
> there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
> nobody objects.
(a) Not everybody uses third party build infrastructures.
(b) Not everybody uses ports
Dear folks,
It seems that /usr/ports is not part of our BSD.usr.mtree tree. Is
there any reason for this? I'm willing to add it to the mtree if
nobody objects.
Thanks for your comments!
Cheers,
--
Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/
See complete headers for GPG key and other information.
pgpx
* loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got my XBOX with an Aladdin modchip. Today I downloaded the LiveCD
> and tried to boot from it, but failed. (I don't have the Cromwell BIOS
> installed on my XBOX ). Then I booted XBOX with GentooX install CD (Home
> edition),
> and replaced GentooX CD with
Rink Springer wrote:
* Ludvig Strigeus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I see this code:
+ENTRY(pic16l_setled)
+ push%ebp
+ mov %esp,%ebp
+
+ movl0x8(%ebp),%ebx
+ orl $0x800,%ebx
+ callpic16l_ledhlp
+ movl$0x701,%ebx
+ callpic16l_
11 matches
Mail list logo