I'll spare a lengthy write-up because I think the patch documents it well
enough. It certainly appears to fix things here when doing very large
block-sized writes, but it also reduces the throughput with those block
sizes. (I don't think there should be any difference when using reasonable
block
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:01:52PM +0530, Dipjyoti Saikia wrote:
: > Hi ,
: >
: > I am writing a device driver and using DELAY() to intoduce delays in
: > my code .Are there any better ways of doing the same f
can I stripe two mirrors with vinum that were created with gmirror?
On 4/14/05, Joan Picanyol i Puig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rex Roof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050414 19:34]:
> > i noticed the documentation hasn't been migrated to gvinum, though.
> >
> &
* Rex Roof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050414 19:34]:
> i noticed the documentation hasn't been migrated to gvinum, though.
>
> anyone have a config suggestion to stripe two mirrors?
Short answer: you can't. Longer answer:
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423C
configurations. I also
noticed that I can often crash my machine by doing things like:
gvinum rm -r diska
On 4/14/05, Joan Picanyol i Puig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050414 18:43]:
> > Bernd Walter wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, Apr 14,
* Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050414 18:43]:
> Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
> >
> >>I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
> >>configured with striping using vinum. What
Matt wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It
is configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to
set it up under a new machine? Should I simply load the old
vinum.conf f
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
under a new machine? Should I simply load the old vinum.conf file and
enab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting
>
> Could this message mean this disk is giving its last breaths ?
Check to see if some part of the system is not overheating due to
a failed fan somewhere. Also check the cabling and the SMART status
of the
Søren Schmidt wrote:
> João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> To use the advantages of SATA NCQ, do I have to use a specific
>> controller, or is this only a software matter?
>
>
> Both actually, and a disk that supports it as well.
But then, if the controller should have NCQ s
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
> I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
> configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
> under a new machine? Should I simply load the old vinum.conf file and
> enable vinum? Than
Hi,
you never can exclude it, but did you check the cabling?
It is not always the drive itself.
Erich
H. S. wrote:
Hi gang,
I have a server running 4.X for almost two years now, without problems -
rock solid as it should be - yesterday the server became unresponsive, now
that I have access again, a
Hi gang,
I have a server running 4.X for almost two years now, without problems -
rock solid as it should be - yesterday the server became unresponsive, now
that I have access again, and while checking the logs, I found this as the
last message before the unresponsiveness:
/kernel: ad0: READ comm
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
under a new machine? Should I simply load the old vinum.conf file and
enable vinum? Thanks much for any help.
drive disk1 device /dev/ad5s1d
drive di
On 4/14/05, Neo-Vortex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:38, M. Parsons wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression (but would need to check to make sure) that
> > all incoming packets are diverted to ng_pppoe when it is hooked into the
> > Ethernet interface.
> >
> > This would
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:38, M. Parsons wrote:
> I was under the impression (but would need to check to make sure) that
> all incoming packets are diverted to ng_pppoe when it is hooked into the
> Ethernet interface.
>
> This would explain your problems.
>
> Can you try this without the interface
16 matches
Mail list logo
