Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Actually, it would be nice to log both. That's what I have done
for some printer-related statistics (not sure if I did that in
FreeBSD, but I do that for production use at RPI).
I like the idea. We can add field 'address' in utmp structure and save
hostname and IP addres
>>> IMHO to be more robust, we should make utmp to hold an IP address
>>> instead of a hostname and change all applications that use it. As
>>> bonus it will fix a delay on login when resolving does not work.
>>> And last(1) will show more useful IP address instead of changable
>>> hostname.
>
[
At 5:16 PM +1100 2/14/05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sun, 2005-Feb-13 19:50:44 +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
IMHO to be more robust, we should make utmp to hold an IP address
> instead of a hostname and change all applications that use it. As
> bonus it will fix a delay on login when resolving doe
Curious about the new ULE scheduler, I've been running 5-STABLE for
about 2-3 days now with preemption enabled. During this period of time,
i "felt" some slowdowns after prolonged use (system gaining latency over
time). I remember seeing a schedgraph of the linux/bsd boot process, so
my question i
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Depending on the environment, the IP address may be more changeable
than the hostname. Definitely, in a DHCP or dialup environment, you
can't rely on the IP address at any time other than during the
session. There is little (if any) benefit in logging the IP address
instead of
On Sun, 2005-Feb-13 19:50:44 +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>IMHO to be more robust, we should make utmp to hold an IP address
>instead of a hostname and change all applications that use it. As bonus
>it will fix a delay on login when resolving does not work. And last(1)
>will show more useful
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:02, Gerald Heinig wrote:
> Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> > Once I linked in dcons, dcons_crom and firewire into the kernel
> > everything worked. (I think only dcons is really needed - maybe a link
> > set issue?)
> > I only used the gdb stub method.
> >
> > Can you send me your
On 02/13/05 03:21:29, David Schultz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005, Jason Henson wrote:
> I saw on a few of the lists here how linux uses ptmalloc2 and it
> outperforms bsd's malloc. I tried to do some research into it and
> found PHK's pdf on it and it seems bsd's malloc was ment to be ok
in
> mo
are you refering to cvs-devel.20050208.1530 if talking about
cvs-devel?
Ion-Mihai Tetcu schrieb:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:28:41 +0100
"Daniel S. Haischt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FreeBSD abyssone.abyssworld.de 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jan
20 13:07:40 CET 2005 root@:/usr/obj/usr/s
I did not modify the default CFLAGS settings,
so they are still set to '-O -pipe'. Don't know
whether the information helps, but I am running
DSPAM on a ...
Fujitsu Siemens Celsius 600 2x 1GHz SMP
... system
Ion-Mihai Tetcu schrieb:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:38:38 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTEC
FreeBSD abyssone.abyssworld.de 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jan
20 13:07:40 CET 2005 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABYSSONE i386
[EMAIL PROTECTED] less /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/ABYSSONE | grep SCHED
options SCHED_4BSD
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING #Posix P1003_1B re
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:10:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Am I missing an easier way to do this?
> >
> May I suggest the following instead:
>
> %%%
> MANLANG?= foo "" bar
> all:
> .for i in ${MANLANG:N""}
> @echo foo ${i}
> .endfor
> %%%
Thanks for your analysis and helpful
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:47:48 +0100
"Daniel S. Haischt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are you refering to cvs-devel.20050208.1530 if talking about
> cvs-devel?
Yes. I have some local tricks, but I've run with that version something
like:
sh -c 'for I in `ls /home/itetcu/zMailOld/mysql/mysql/222*` ;
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:28:41 +0100
"Daniel S. Haischt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD abyssone.abyssworld.de 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jan
> 20 13:07:40 CET 2005 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABYSSONE i386
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] less /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/ABYSSONE | grep S
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:38:38 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ Stefan, please give me a uname -a and scheduler type. Thanks. ]
and CFLAGS; on both machines I use -O2 -pipe.
>Pull debug symbols in for statically linked binaries.
>gcc -O2 cleanups.
--
IOnut
Unregi
[ Stefan, please give me a uname -a and scheduler type. Thanks. ]
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:25:59 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:04:37 -0500
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:47:52PM +0200, Ion-Mihai T
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:04:37 -0500
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:47:52PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:26:16 +0200
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:03:30 -0500
> > > Brian
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:47:52PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:26:16 +0200
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:03:30 -0500
> > Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200,
w(1) behaviour has changed with brien commit in w.c revision 1.48.
Funny, but looks like '-n' options works right after commit, not before.
The reason is utmp holds a host name and w(1) with '-n' flag _do_
resolve hostname back in IP address and without '-n' don't resolve it.
It's confised.
IMHO
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:26:16 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:03:30 -0500
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > One of my ports - mail/dsp
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:03:30 -0500
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > One of my ports - mail/dspam-devel stays at 3.4 because newer versions
> > crash on FreeBSD (they work on Linux and Solar
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:51:11PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > One of my ports - mail/dspam-devel stays at 3.4 because new
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > One of my ports - mail/dspam-devel stays at 3.4 because newer versions
> > crash on FreeBSD (they work on Linux and Solaris).
> > Can s
Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start
running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full
ssh/tcp connection. Whereas SNMP-v3 over UDP is a lot faster and
simpler. And it is not like you are transporting majore security type
data
Well, I've been u
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> One of my ports - mail/dspam-devel stays at 3.4 because newer versions
> crash on FreeBSD (they work on Linux and Solaris).
> Can someone make some sense from the output bellow ?
>
> I'm willing to make a port and help
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
WJW>Harti Brandt wrote:
WJW>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
WJW>>
WJW>> RW>
WJW>> RW>On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote:
WJW>> RW>
WJW>> RW>> I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description
WJW>> RW>> to get a pi
Andrew J Caines wrote:
I'd also vouch for collecting orcallator data using rsync over ssh from the
client systems to the cruching and report generating server.
Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start
running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full ssh/t
Harti Brandt wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
RW>
RW>On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote:
RW>
RW>> I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description
RW>> to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different
RW>> processes. I've seen that top uses
Hi Kris,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:32:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
> expect:
>
> MANLANG?=foo ""
> all:
> .for i in ${MANLANG}
> .if empty(${i})
> @echo foo ${i}
> .endif
> .endfor
>
> ports-i386%make
> foo foo
> foo
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
KK>The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
KK>expect:
KK>
KK>MANLANG?=foo ""
KK>all:
KK>.for i in ${MANLANG}
KK>.if empty(${i})
KK>@echo foo ${i}
KK>.endif
KK>.endfor
KK>
KK>ports-i386%make
KK>foo foo
KK>foo
KK>
KK>I think
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005, Jason Henson wrote:
> I saw on a few of the lists here how linux uses ptmalloc2 and it
> outperforms bsd's malloc. I tried to do some research into it and
> found PHK's pdf on it and it seems bsd's malloc was ment to be ok in
> most every situation. Because of this it s
31 matches
Mail list logo
