On 30. Jun 2004, at 3:01, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
While Mach is derived from 4.3BSD (circa 1986~1988), there's been about
15 years worth of divergence since then. For example, FreeBSD is
monolithic while Mach is more micro-kernel based. Also the driver
models
are quite different, eg Darwin uses IO
Lucas wrote:
> Here's an idea.. install FreeBSD 5.2.1 and use the ports collection to
> get PearPC. Then you can get a license to OSX and run it.
>
> I read the hardware support list, and sound doesn't even work yet in
> pearpc. It might be more beneficial to buy a used Mac. I have a
> Fre
Hi,
Martin Olsson wrote:
Hi,
* MacOS X is based on FreeBSD
* there is a x86 kernel for FreeBSD
Does that mean I can buy a copy of MacOS X, download an x86 kernel for
freeBSD, do some (or quite alot of) hacking and then get MacOS X running
on my PC?
take a look at the Darwin project.
I realize th
In the last episode (Jun 29), zera holladay said:
> > Even more interestingly, just how much code has migrated from
> > Darwin to FreeBSD? Apple seems to do a lot of taking from the Open
> > Source community, how much have we taken much back?
>
> I was wondering about this ... there was a thread n
> Even more interestingly, just how much code has
> migrated from Darwin to
> FreeBSD? Apple seems to do a lot of taking from the
> Open Source
> community, how much have we taken much back?
I was wondering about this ... there was a thread not
too long ago about Darwin and FreeBSD. Somebody made
Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 21:20, Lev Walkin wrote:
MacOS X is based on multiple concepts, including
Darwin. Darwin is based on FreeBSD.
"Darwin is based on FreeBSD" - technically, no :)
Darwin is a continuation of NeXT Step which is based on the Mach kernel.
While Mach is deri
Hi Alasdair,
(B
(BAlasdair Lumsden wrote:
(B
(B
(B>>On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 03:24, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
(B>>
(B>>
(B>
(B>
(B
(BAny idea?
(B
(B
(B>>
(B>>
(B>>
(B>>http://www.daemonnews.org/200010/darwin.html
(B>>
(B>>
(B>
(B>
(B
(BI see.
(B
(BEit
I have pearpc installed from ports. I'm having trouble installing
10.1. In fact, i can't seem to get the cd to even boot at this point.
Lucas Holt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site)
JustJournal.com (Free blogging)
__
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 03:24, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >There are bits of FreeBSD in the kernel..
> >the majority of the importing has been in the userland however where
> >the UNIX userland is mostly based on FreeBSD (or so I'm told)
>
> There seem to be some stories about Mac
Hi Julian or guys,
Julian Elischer wrote:
There are bits of FreeBSD in the kernel..
the majority of the importing has been in the userland however where
the UNIX userland is mostly based on FreeBSD (or so I'm told)
There seem to be some stories about Mac X.
I have read the article which menti
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:38:51PM +0100, Markie wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arne Schwabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:51 PM
> Subject: Setting Standby Mode for ATA Disks
>
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | is there a way to set the standby mo
Here's an idea.. install FreeBSD 5.2.1 and use the ports collection to
get PearPC. Then you can get a license to OSX and run it.
I read the hardware support list, and sound doesn't even work yet in
pearpc. It might be more beneficial to buy a used Mac. I have a
FreeBSD desktop and an Ibook.
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 09:16 pm, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> This recently caught my eye:
> http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9171/sam0406h/0406h.htm
>
> There are a number of good sounding suggestions in there.
They gave a paper on it at USENIX ATC as well.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <><
This recently caught my eye:
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9171/sam0406h/0406h.htm
There are a number of good sounding suggestions in there.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscri
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 21:20, Lev Walkin wrote:
> > MacOS X is based on multiple concepts, including
> > Darwin. Darwin is based on FreeBSD.
>
>
> "Darwin is based on FreeBSD" - technically, no :)
>
> Darwin is a continuation of NeXT Step which is
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 21:20, Lev Walkin wrote:
> MacOS X is based on multiple concepts, including
> Darwin. Darwin is based on FreeBSD.
"Darwin is based on FreeBSD" - technically, no :)
Darwin is a continuation of NeXT Step which is based on the Mach kernel.
While Mach is derived from 4.3BSD (c
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:01:49PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * MacOS X is based on FreeBSD
> * there is a x86 kernel for FreeBSD
And a lot of other sources too. Not a drop-in replacement.
You can Run Mac OS X or Darwin/PPC on FreeBSD w/ PearPC
( http://pearpc.sf.net ). And it's pre
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 03:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello freebsd-hackers,
>
>
> Hi,
> for my own purposes I add some new features to ipfw2.
> now hereis patches for 5.1
> Luigi some time ago have a look at ones, but now..
> if it is looks like interesting, get and enjoy it free
>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:01:49PM +0200, Martin Olsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * MacOS X is based on FreeBSD
> * there is a x86 kernel for FreeBSD
>
> Does that mean I can buy a copy of MacOS X, download an x86 kernel for
> freeBSD, do some (or quite alot of) hacking and then get MacOS X running
> on
Martin Olsson wrote:
Hi,
* MacOS X is based on FreeBSD
* there is a x86 kernel for FreeBSD
Does that mean I can buy a copy of MacOS X, download an x86 kernel for
freeBSD, do some (or quite alot of) hacking and then get MacOS X running
on my PC?
I realize that such hacking would be quite substant
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Does that mean I can buy a copy of MacOS X, download an x86 kernel for
: freeBSD, do some (or quite alot of) hacking and then get MacOS X running
: on my PC?
No. MacOS X is for PowerPC, not Intel. Also, the
Hi,
* MacOS X is based on FreeBSD
* there is a x86 kernel for FreeBSD
Does that mean I can buy a copy of MacOS X, download an x86 kernel for
freeBSD, do some (or quite alot of) hacking and then get MacOS X running
on my PC?
I realize that such hacking would be quite substantial but maybe if I
f
I proudly anounce that I've managed to make a workable port of open1x
xsupplicant for FreeBSD :) I don't actually have a wireless card, and
only nead it in 'wired' mode (e.g. over ethernet), so the wireless bits
almost certainly won't work.
Anyway, the patch is at http://www.sharanet.org/~ivora
Ivan Voras wrote:
I need to convert this code:
ret = recvfrom(thisint->sockInt, &resultframe, 1520, MSG_PEEK, 0, 0);
if (ret > 0) return TRUE;
to use BPF. Essentialy, how to find out if a packet is available over
the BPF interface?
try to read() it and read() will hang there until there is data in
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Auge Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: While I was trying to track to find out how a device alloc a new memory
: resource, I have been little confused on finding out how the new PCI device
: can deal with a case when the activation calls pmap_mapdev?
Hello freebsd-hackers,
Hi,
for my own purposes I add some new features to ipfw2.
now hereis patches for 5.1
Luigi some time ago have a look at ones, but now..
if it is looks like interesting, get and enjoy it free
this is not a release, I stil work about it.
and I wait for 5.3 to ma
I need to convert this code:
ret = recvfrom(thisint->sockInt, &resultframe, 1520, MSG_PEEK, 0, 0);
if (ret > 0) return TRUE;
to use BPF. Essentialy, how to find out if a packet is available over
the BPF interface?
--
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nath Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't
you unde
Hi everybody,
First of all, please copy all answers back to me, since I am not anymore
subscribed to -hackers. (Panic: time fault)
I´ve done some changes to the kernel mknod(2) handling to make it more
compatible to the Linux behaviour, allowing one to create files of type VREG,
VSOCK
Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible
> > > filesystem snapshots and
> > > _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
> >
> > I don't think there is any dang
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:15:45AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> I was looking at it and came across getifaddrs(). This function does not
> depend on a open socket (yes, mine is AF_LINK, sockaddr_dl), and
> apparently returns a list of all interfaces. Is there really no other
> way than to trave
Hi all,
While I was trying to track to find out how a device alloc a new memory
resource, I have been little confused on finding out how the new PCI device
can deal with a case when the activation calls pmap_mapdev
What I need to understand that what will happen if pmap_mapdev allocated a
n
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:29:39 +0100
Arvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I have a bit of a problem to get my Wacom Graphire3 (USB) to work
> with FreeBSD. At first I thought I was doing something wrong, but it
> seems that FreeBSD doesnt understand it. I know it works with
> OpenBS
32 matches
Mail list logo
