Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:34:04, andrit wrote about "Re: /bin/ls sorting bug?":
>> And AFAICS, there's no way to tell ls: "first sort on time,
>> then on filename, then on size", etc. This would make a nice addition
>> though. :)
> But there is nice sort command and power of unix.
> Don't you rem
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:59:12AM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:52:29PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:06:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > > Looking through ls source shows that the sort
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 05:07:56PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> this is a question for marcel,
> but basically "this may change". In current code the thread_id of the
> first thread is set to be equal to the PID. Marcel and I have discussed
> reworking the thread_id code and in the new code this
this is a question for marcel,
but basically "this may change". In current code the thread_id of the
first thread is set to be equal to the PID. Marcel and I have discussed
reworking the thread_id code and in the new code this will possibly not
be true.
Under KSE teh original thread has probably e
At 4:14 AM +0200 6/20/04, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
is it normal that the selected process is the last forked thread
and not the thread owner (father) ?
I committed the changes, so people can try this if they want.
Example:
(48) ps -HO lwp,nlwp
PIDLWP NLWP TT STAT TIME COMMAND
1870 18
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:56:25PM +0200, Ing.Richard Andrysek wrote:
> I've read your question about SPDIF capture device on freebsd. I am
> currently looking for similar device.Have you found such one? Can you
> access subcode etc.?
The Soyo Dragon Plus! K7V has a SPDIF input/output; t
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:59:12AM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:52:29PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:06:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > Looking through ls source shows that the sorting is done by passing a
> > > comparison function t
Hello!
Does anybody know, why sshd call getpwnam() even if user is
authenticating via PAM? This broke remote authentication (RADIUS,
TACACS+) when user doesn't exist in local password database.
--
Alexey Zagarin
emax telecommunications
___
[EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:52:29PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:06:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Looking through ls source shows that the sorting is done by passing a
> > comparison function to fts_open(3). In the case of sorting by
> > modification time, the *
9 matches
Mail list logo