Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:34:04, andrit wrote about "Re: /bin/ls sorting bug?":
>> And AFAICS, there's no way to tell ls: "first sort on time, >> then on filename, then on size", etc. This would make a nice addition >> though. :) > But there is nice sort command and power of unix. > Don't you remember the initial UNIX concept to make miracles by small > things fired together? :) Well, let's disable sorting in ls output totally and give this role to sort. I thinks folks won't adopt this idea, especially said that ls output isn't easily machine-parseable. -netch- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
