> Swen and MyDoom are easy to detect and reject at the SMTP stage. The
> fact that our mail servers don't do this is a PITA, as it forces list
> subscribers to accept them as well (if you reject list mail because it
> contains a virus, Mailman disables your subscription)
not a problem - those sh
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to generate static call graphs from sections of src/sys/kern,
> src/sys/net, and src/sys/netinet, and ideally, get an output that looks
> pretty when printed to a (perhaps large) piece of paper. It doesn't need
> to be able to handle function p
I'd like to generate static call graphs from sections of src/sys/kern,
src/sys/net, and src/sys/netinet, and ideally, get an output that looks
pretty when printed to a (perhaps large) piece of paper. It doesn't need
to be able to handle function pointer magic in structures (vnode
operations, sock
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:04:29PM -0500, Andrew J Caines wrote:
[Tale of pain and suffering related to statfs change omitted.]
> How can I dig myself out of this hole so I can installkernel and
> installworld with my shiney new 5.2.1 build?
Download fixit CDs or floppy images for 5.2+ or from
sn
[ nb. There's a question at the bottom. The rest is for context and the
archives, since I couldn't find this kind of detail there. ]
System running RELENG_5_1 (5.1-p12, IIRC) built RELENG_5_2 and started
installworld before installkernel in flagrant violation of the correct
method and dire warn
Hi all.
First, sorry for my bad english =)
Well, on the past(28/03/2003 on FreeBSD 5.1-Release), i'm read about the
nfs bug, and now, i'm got the same error on my fbsd box, and on history
of all freebsd lists i've found the same response: no fix for this bug.
On my server the error appears, only
On Monday 01 March 2004 10:53 am, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Swen and MyDoom are easy to detect and reject at the SMTP stage. The
> fact that our mail servers don't do this is a PITA, as it forces list
> subscribers to accept them as well (if you reject list mail because it
> contains a virus, M
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Swen and MyDoom are easy to detect and reject at the SMTP stage. The
fact that our mail servers don't do this is a PITA, as it force
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
> > getting really annoying..
> Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Swen and MyDoom are easy to detect and reje
At 09:38 PM 29/02/2004, Don Bowman wrote:
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 08:44 PM 29/02/2004, Don Bowman wrote:
> >From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:17:44 -0500, in
> sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers >
> > > >If you want to spend more time
well,
i collected about 2200 iworm.swens from freebsd since december'03 which is
about 700 per month or 20 per day ...
isnt there a way to track this down ?
its at all not the best reference, freebsd gives besides its known
advantages ...
best kai
>
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wr
Hi,
Julian Elischer wrote on Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:01:41PM -0800:
> Oh it was just a rant.. :-(
>
[..]
> > > Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
> > > getting really annoying..
> >
> > Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
[..]
Many people are already using
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
> getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
> getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:17:44 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers >
>If you want to spend more time in kernel, perhaps change
>
>I might have HZ @ 2500 as well.
Hi,
Just curious as to the reasoning behind that ?
---Mike
___
[EMAIL PROT
Here what happens after detaching and attaching:
Feb 29 16:43:26 katrin /kernel: umass0: at uhub2 port 4 (addr 3) disconnected
Feb 29 16:43:26 katrin /kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device
Feb 29 16:43:26 katrin /kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry
Feb 29 16:43:26 katrin /k
I have an ednet. USB 2.0 Hub 4-1 which seems to be
identicyl to the Cypress Semiconductor Slim Hub.
The latest 4.9-STABLE is still missing the patch
> > --- uhub.c.orig Fri Jul 4 20:17:50 2003
> > +++ uhub.c Fri Jul 4 21:57:31 2003
> > @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
> > /* Get hub descriptor
Hi,
Julian Elischer wrote on Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:01:41PM -0800:
> Oh it was just a rant.. :-(
>
[..]
> > > Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
> > > getting really annoying..
> >
> > Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
[..]
Many people are already using
18 matches
Mail list logo
