Situation resolved. Turns out there was one small line in a kernel
config file that we overlooked. Seems the apm device was causing a
massive performance penalty. We don't really need it so we removed it.
All performance metrics are now exactly where they should be.
--
Milo Hyson
Chief "Mad" Scie
We don't have any other systems that are as similar as the two in the
test, however we did plot context-switching performance against CPU and
memory performance on several systems to see if anything jumped out. We
found that beastie (the 2200+) is doing only about 26% of the
task-switches/dhrystone
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Milo Hyson wrote:
> We've got these two very similar machines that are exhibiting
> drastically different context-switching performance. The slower of the
> two is actually task-switching at four times the rate of the other.
> We've gone through several benchmarks and are at
We've got these two very similar machines that are exhibiting
drastically different context-switching performance. The slower of the
two is actually task-switching at four times the rate of the other.
We've gone through several benchmarks and are at a complete loss to
explain it. We've set up a pag
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:02:08PM +0800, Jun Su wrote:
>I think this algorithms for proc_alloc, pfind and zpfind are all O(1). The
>worst situation is that
>it reaches PID_MAX. In this situation, we need expand our pidtbl. This may
>bring some delay. However, this situation will only occurs few ti
Hi again,
I installed fbsd 49 on other disk/ide ctrl (ad0),
and boot verbose :
...
BIOS Geometries:
0:03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
0:03fffe3f 0..1022=1024 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
0 accounted for
Device configuration finished.
...
ad0
Yeah, the problem with these is they're a single 48v input.
I have an A/B redundant 48v DC battery backed generator backed
plant on the telco side, and a fair amount of extra capacity...
So I'd like to take advantage of it.
But thanks for checking.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:39:06AM -0800, Broo
- Original Message -
From: "David Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Xin LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:04 AM
Subject: Re: Call for testers: New PID allocator patch for -CURRENT
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2
Hi,
On this url :
ftp://current.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.9-STABLE-20040131-JPSNAP.log
" Building 4.9-STABLE-20040131-JPSNAP is failed. "
...
" cpio: write error: No space left on device "
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
9 matches
Mail list logo
