On Sunday, 11 January 2004 at 0:12:57 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Long writes:
>> All,
>>
>> I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
>> and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
>> to work pret
On Saturday, 10 January 2004 at 18:12:28 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
>> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>> source tree, maybe what we need to do is
Wes Peters wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2004 09:34 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Michel TALON wrote:
Sincerely FreeBSD developers have more important tasks than spending
hours to fit an installable system on floppies. When FreeBSD used
one floppy, it was tolerable to do fl
On Friday 09 January 2004 09:34 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Michel TALON wrote:
> >
> > Sincerely FreeBSD developers have more important tasks than spending
> > hours to fit an installable system on floppies. When FreeBSD used
> > one floppy, it was tolerable to do floppy inst
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
on the project front page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available
under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the project wouldn't
have to rely on more GPLed code.
I wonder i
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
[.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:25:46AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Our main fileserver has a filesystem with 2.7e6 files and we
>> are continually running into undocumented "features" (aka bugs) as a
>> result of the large number of files.
>
>I
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:01:13PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
>>Peter Schuller wrote:
>>
>>>Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
>>>on the project front page:
>>>
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/
>>
>>A significant one of
Scott Long wrote:
All,
I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
to work pretty well on 4.x, it has never been viable on 5.x; it never
survived the introduction of GEOM and removal of the old disk
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD.
I'm having trouble seeing what RF does that Vinum (or at least a
properly GEOMified Vinum) can't do...
DES
Please read th
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
> and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD.
I'm having trouble seeing what RF does that Vinum (or at least a
properly GEOMified Vinum) can't do...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTE
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Our main fileserver has a filesystem with 2.7e6 files and we
> are continually running into undocumented "features" (aka bugs) as a
> result of the large number of files.
Is 2.7e6 a typo for 2.7e9? I can't imagine *any* modern file system
having
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It will refuse to strip symbols if:
>
> foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
>
> But I need it to.
use -G instead of -K, e.g.
$ strip -G apifunc1 -G apifunc2 foo.o
will make every symbol except apifunc1 and apifunc2 local.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smø
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Scott Long wrote:
> I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
> and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
> to work pretty well on 4.x, it has never been viable on 5.x; it never
> survived the introduction of GEOM and
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:35:51AM -0800, Tom Arnold wrote:
>Building a box thats going to house many billions of small files. Think
>innd circa 1998 or someone trying to house AOLs mail system on cyrus or
>something.
This is probably going to stress any filesystem. You might like to
consider an
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > > I'll try again without the BOOTP options...
> > Yeah. Our PXE booting support isn't really the same as the traditional
> > diskless booting envir
All,
I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
to work pretty well on 4.x, it has never been viable on 5.x; it never
survived the introduction of GEOM and removal of the old disk layer.
I'm coming
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > I'll try again without the BOOTP options...
> Yeah. Our PXE booting support isn't really the same as the traditional
> diskless booting environment.
It works fine without the BOOTP options...
>
* Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040110 03:17] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
> > .o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
> > that even if I use "ld -r -o main.o obj1.o
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you send "tcpdump -e" output?
>
> 22:18:14.884745 0:40:63:c4:60:3d ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 590: 0.0.0.0.68 >
> 255.255.255.255.67: xid:0x64c4603d secs:4 flags:0x8000 [|bootp]
> 22:18:16.911162 0:
At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
Peter Schuller wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
on the project front page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available
under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the project
Peter Schuller wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed on the project front
page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available under a
BSD-style license. Meaning that the project wouldn't have to rely on
more GPLed code.
I
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you send "tcpdump -e" output?
22:18:14.884745 0:40:63:c4:60:3d ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 590: 0.0.0.0.68 >
255.255.255.255.67: xid:0x64c4603d secs:4 flags:0x8000 [|bootp]
22:18:16.911162 0:40:63:c4:60:3d ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 590: 0.0.0.0.68 >
255.2
At 9:05 AM -0800 1/10/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
That's a pretty major test! Could we perhaps pick off
> something smaller? The "projects" repository, for
> instance? (or is that still tied to the base-system?)
SVN is meant to be a replacem
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a VIA C3-based mini-ITX box for diskless boot using
> isc-dhcpd 3.0 from ports. The kernel and modules load fine, but
> isc-dhcpd doesn't seem to answer the kernel's DHCP discover message.
>
> The following is a tcpdump of t
I'm trying to set up a VIA C3-based mini-ITX box for diskless boot
using isc-dhcpd 3.0 from ports. The kernel and modules load fine, but
isc-dhcpd doesn't seem to answer the kernel's DHCP discover message.
The following is a tcpdump of the traffic the DHCP server sees. I've
removed the timestamp
> I haven't been following this too closely, so forgive me if this has
> been mentioned. Does Subversion support any type of transaction based
> committing?
Yes. Commits are atomic.
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed on the project front
page:
http://subversion.tigris.o
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
but we have to wait for a 1.0 Release, and this would be
something that should
Something for us all to smile or to celebrate!
|Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:16:28 + (GMT)
|From: Scott Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Subject: Unix turns 0x4000 !
|
|In just over 26 hours (Sun Jan 11 00:37:04 2004 GMT to be exact) UNIX
|will bust through the 11 (bina
Hi,
I am writing a kernel module in which I have created a kernel thread with
kthread_create. For debugging I have added a couple of printf's in the
thread-routine. Running the module on a single-proc system works fine, but
when running it on one of my SMP machines the console freezes after a c
The "Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x" thread
prompts me to report how we have been upgrading FreeBSD remotely
since FreeBSD 3.x. First, we build:
. custom minimal kernels for each HW type in the field;
we store this kernel in /boot/maint/k.HW.gz
. custom MD image for each ma
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
> .o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
> that even if I use "ld -r -o main.o obj1.o obj2.c libfoo.a" then I
> can not strip symbols in obj1.o that are refe
* Richard Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 20:59 -0500]:
> Richard Coleman wrote:
> >I apologize if this is a dumb question. But rather than using two
> >floppies during the install process, why not three or four?
> >
> >Richard Coleman
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sorry, I just got caught up
On Friday 09 January 2004 17:03, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I have to develop small server which has to manage custom microcontroller
> via parallel port interface.
> Does anyone know good manual/documentation about UNIX / BSD parallel port
> programming ?
Most of it shou
At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
but we have to wait for a 1.0 Release, and this would be
something that should be done gradually.. for ex
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:57:56PM +0100, Martin Nilsson wrote:
>This discussion is just like when the i386 support was removed from the
>GENERIC kernel, a lot of noise about old systems that wouldn't be able
>to run (or benefit) from FreeBSD 5 anyway.
There's a big jump between i386 systems and
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:26:54PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:23:58PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
yes, we need something like
struct pci_device_info {
uint32_tpciid;
37 matches
Mail list logo
