On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:08:18PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
> Can anybody perhaps give a hint in which direction to look or to make this
> go away?
Do you have stale modules loaded?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I got lazy, I figured it out.
On Monday 27 October 2003 12:35 pm, Jerry Toung wrote:
> I am trying to figure out what is the ifconfig command to jump into
> case GRESADDRS:
> case GRESADDRD:
>
> in gre_ioctl.
> Thank you,
> Jerry.
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROT
On Monday 27 October 2003 12:42 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2003 07:31 am, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
> > > PID file before or after the setuid?
> > >
> > > Two methods ex
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Monday 27 October 2003 07:31 am, Dan Langille wrote:
> > If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
> > PID file before or after the setuid?
> >
> > Two methods exists AFAIK:
> >
> > 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is
I am trying to figure out what is the ifconfig command to jump into
case GRESADDRS:
case GRESADDRD:
in gre_ioctl.
Thank you,
Jerry.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any
On Monday 27 October 2003 07:31 am, Dan Langille wrote:
> If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
> PID file before or after the setuid?
>
> Two methods exists AFAIK:
>
> 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
> 2 - write your PID to /var/run/mya
On 27 Oct 2003 at 13:08, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
> buildworld and my machine panicked. Tried a few more times with random
> panics. Same random panics occur if I build the kernel. After a bit of
> struggling I managed to get a GENERIC kernel built with debug symbols
> on the latest source. I did no
:...
:> A hash probably isn't the right data structure for either dimension
:> (DES didn't say it was, I notice). Finding the next-largest available
:> entry is a useful operation, here, so a list would be better than a
:> hash. [Or a tree; the point is that exact-match isn't the only kind
:> of
In a message written on Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:31:18AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> Any suggestions?
Here's a slightly backwards concept.
We're all familar with how you can open a file, remove it from the
directory, and not have it "go away" until the application closes
it. Well, extend those s
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2003, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> > > Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Yes, it would appear this is a legacy thing that existed in the original
> > > > 1994 import of the BSD 4.4 Lite
On 27 Oct 2003 at 17:39, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
> > PID file before or after the setuid?
> >
> > Two methods exists AFAIK:
> >
> > 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
>
Dan Langille wrote:
If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
PID file before or after the setuid?
Two methods exists AFAIK:
1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/
is chow
On Saturday 25 October 2003 13:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> For the last ten years, the NetBSD, OpenBSD and FreeBSD projects
> have had a tacit agreement not to post propaganda and inflamatory
> accusations to each others email lists (what project members do in
> their own projects is of course
Dixitur illum "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribere...
Hi,
> If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
> PID file before or after the setuid?
>
> Two methods exists AFAIK:
>
> 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
OpenBSD seems to favo
If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
PID file before or after the setuid?
Two methods exists AFAIK:
1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/
is chown myapp:myapp
Of the
Hi all,
Here is a new backtrace on a 5.1-RELEASE-P10 that I got just now.
I will however rip out this network card and replace it quickly as per
Steven Hartland instructions. ;)
Thanks in advance!
Jaco
gdb backtrace:
frame# gdb -k kernel.debug.200310271200 vmcore.0
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyri
I had the same on box here turned out to be a dodgy netcard. Symptoms
where when transferring locally 100MB switch ftp / scp would start off at
8Mb/s but quickly drop off then the box would panic. Possibly the
same thing.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Jaco van Tonder" <[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
I installed 4.8-RELEASE from CD yesterday on my P4-2.4GHz machine.
Updated sources to the latest 4.8-RELEASE-p13. Started doing buildworld and
my
machine panicked. Tried a few more times with random panics. Same random
panics
occur if I build the kernel. After a bit of struggling I managed to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:43:38PM +0400, Sergey V. Belov wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:53:27 +0100
> Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:09:25AM +0400, Sergey V. Belov wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > > I had an experience of install this LAN adapter on latest F
Hi,
I have written a patch for ulpt.c which allows reading the
lpt device. This operation is required to get status information of
some printers (eg. Epson Stylus) when connected via usb.
Please can you review this patch (it applies to 5.1 P6)
Thanks,
Gernot
*** ulpt.c.orig Wed Oct 22 10:59:53
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:53:27 +0100
Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:09:25AM +0400, Sergey V. Belov wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I had an experience of install this LAN adapter on latest FreeBSD RELENG_4_8
> > (4.8p13):
> > PILA 8460B \ EtherExpress PRO/100+ Serve
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:09:25AM +0400, Sergey V. Belov wrote:
> Hello all,
> I had an experience of install this LAN adapter on latest FreeBSD RELENG_4_8
> (4.8p13):
> PILA 8460B \ EtherExpress PRO/100+ Server Adapter (PCI; TPE; 100 / 10 Mbps).
> After install, this card has not been responsed;
22 matches
Mail list logo
