On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 05:03 PM, Andrew wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
>
>> It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in "Unix Network
>> Programming", v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
>> case differently.
>
> My section 20.3
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 05:10 PM, Greg Shenaut wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Justin
> C.Walker" cleopede:
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
author says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared
memory because the PDP
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Justin C.Walker" cleopede:
>>> I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
>>> author says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared
>>> memory because the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it..."?
>> where'd they get this? that's
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
> It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in "Unix Network
> Programming", v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
> case differently.
My section 20.3 is on UDP Datagram Trunctation...did you mean 17.3
(Routing Sockets:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
> allocate too many nmbclusters?
No.
> For example, if you have a disk with a kernel compiled with 25000
> clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will it crash
> and burn?
For t
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020128 16:35] wrote:
>
> Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
> allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel
> compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M
Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel
compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will
it crash and burn? Also are clusters allocated out of the VM_K
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1) wrote:
>
>> I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
>> author
>> says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory
>> because
>>
On Monday, 28 January 2002 at 18:34:10 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
>> I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
>>
>> Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
>> in a plex at once? For instance
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1) wrote:
> I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why author
> says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory because
> the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it..."?
where'd they get this? that's an od
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why author
says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory because
the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it..."?
Well, it wasn't so obvious deal with PDP-11 MMU, but why you have to tell to
your
students about it tod
Message details and virus information
To help identify the email:
The message was titled: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #372
The message date was: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:28:08 -0800
>It looks like the TCP recieve checksum issues weren't the only ones we
>had to contend with. I've got a couple of new iXsystems 2650's with
>3Com 3C996-T's in them and while running cvsup I get long hangs usually
>resulting in a lost connection. When the machines recover I see
>watchdog timeout
It looks like the TCP recieve checksum issues weren't the only ones we
had to contend with. I've got a couple of new iXsystems 2650's with
3Com 3C996-T's in them and while running cvsup I get long hangs usually
resulting in a lost connection. When the machines recover I see
watchdog timeout mess
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thierry Herbelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020123 14:24] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got an SCSI CD-Writer, which only gives errors when I try to use
> > cd-record (see full log at the end of the message)
> >
> > As the problem is identical on a fr
[Thread moved to -jobs]
On Monday, January 28, 2002, Lorene Ledingham wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Lorene Ledingham and I am a professional recruiter. A client of mine is
>looking for a programmer with background in Assembly Language, C++, Unix, etc. and if
>anyone on this list can help me with n
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
> I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
>
> Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
> in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
> that I'm writing a 200MB file to.
Hi,
My name is Lorene
Ledingham and I am a professional recruiter. A client of mine is looking
for a programmer with background in Assembly Language, C++, Unix, etc. and if
anyone on this list can help me with names of people I can network with I would
greatly appreciate it.
Please respond
On 27 Jan 2002 at 20:18, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said:
> > Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if
> > there is a better way to do this.
>
> Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the
> list:
>
> whil
Thank you Jason. Yes, it would be helpful. And I had wondered if that
was possible. Cheers.
FWIW: I am now testing the script using the ports/sysutils/daemontools
utilities. That seems to be working well so far. I will be writing a
daemontools article for the Diary and will post the URL h
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:40:03
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:35:35
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`
Message details and virus information
To help identify the email:
The message was titled: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #371
The message date was: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:27:51 -0800
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:27:46
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 16:49:31
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 16:46:35
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`
Dan Langille wrote:
>
> Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if
> there is a better way to do this.
>
> This script waits for a file to arrive in a directory, then runs a scipt
> to process it. It's part of FreshPorts. the procmail script spools the
> incoming cvs
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason Andresen writes:
>I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
>
>Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
>in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
>that I'm writing a 200MB file to. Is there some
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Andrew Boothman wrote:
...
> appendices is all about FreeBSD and its internals. It's 48 pages long
> and is available from
>
> http://www.wiley.com/college/silberschatz6e/0471417432/pdf/bsd.pdf
>
I like it. The dinosaur book has been a clasic forever. The
appe
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
that I'm writing a 200MB file to. Is there some way I can make
vinum attempt to write data to all of the dr
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know if a simple priority disk scheduler exists for a
> recent (4.X) FreeBSD? I don't need anything fancy, basically the POSIX
> rtprio equivalent for disks.
>
> The Eclipse people (at Bell) have something like that, but it's based
>
"Lajos Zaccomer (ETH)" wrote:
> You may be interested with my results, thus I summarize briefly what
> I am very much surprised of. You were absolutely right with the order
> of negotiation messages (not surprised of this). I may not know in
> English good (or bad? :-) enough for an RFC. What I w
37 matches
Mail list logo
