In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Devin Butterfield writes:
: 902-928MHz. They are Frequency hopping spread spectrum radios, and I think
: they can do 1 watt max. I've found that I can maintain a link at about 2
: blocks away with ping times around 180-200ms (using PPP). I'm sure I could
: probabl
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 11:39, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Devin Butterfield writes:
> : Oh, and the new radios work in peer-to-peer mode just fine. You can
> : either use them like regular modems and just dial the MAC address of the
> : other modem and establish a ppp li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Devin Butterfield writes:
: Oh, and the new radios work in peer-to-peer mode just fine. You can either
: use them like regular modems and just dial the MAC address of the other modem
: and establish a ppp link, or they can be used in "Starmode" (which is what
: if
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:27, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David
Scheidt writes:
> : :I was thinking about porting netbsd's if_strip driver (the driver for
> : : the metricom ricochet radios--allows you to use these radios as nodes
> : : in a WLAN). Before I do this, I
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David
Scheidt writes:
: :I was thinking about porting netbsd's if_strip driver (the driver for the
: :metricom ricochet radios--allows you to use these radios as nodes in a WLAN).
: :Before I do this, I thought I should first check to see if anyone else had
: :alrea
Devin Butterfield wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was thinking about porting netbsd's if_strip driver (the driver for the
> metricom ricochet radios--allows you to use these radios as nodes in a WLAN).
> Before I do this, I thought I should first check to see if anyone else had
> already ported it to
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:47:50PM -0700, Hans Zaunere wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 2) If a 10k binary is running, the signal is sent, and the program
> > > is reloaded from disk, but is 100k (or 1k even) how does the
> > > signal handling function get called, taking into account what
> > > Stevens says
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Devin Butterfield wrote:
:Hi folks,
:
:I was thinking about porting netbsd's if_strip driver (the driver for the
:metricom ricochet radios--allows you to use these radios as nodes in a WLAN).
:Before I do this, I thought I should first check to see if anyone else had
:already
Hi folks,
I was thinking about porting netbsd's if_strip driver (the driver for the
metricom ricochet radios--allows you to use these radios as nodes in a WLAN).
Before I do this, I thought I should first check to see if anyone else had
already ported it to FreeBSD...?
--
Regards, Devin.
To U
> [...]
> > 2) If a 10k binary is running, the signal is sent,
> and
> > the program is reloaded from disk, but is 100k (or
> 1k
> > even) how does the signal handling function get
> > called, taking into account what Stevens says.
> Steven
> > states that the sigmask remains for calls across
> e
* Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010814 17:42] wrote:
> [pulls out his dead horse..]
>
> > > one thread would wake up. The mistake in your sample seems to be that
> > > you're having all threads block on the same fd. Why?
> >
> > Probably he has a bunch of daemons waiting around for work to
>
[pulls out his dead horse..]
> > one thread would wake up. The mistake in your sample seems to be that
> > you're having all threads block on the same fd. Why?
>
> Probably he has a bunch of daemons waiting around for work to
> do (e.g. HTTP daemons all listening for connections to accept
> on
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:09:32AM -0700, Hans Zaunere wrote:
[...]
> However in reading about this, in Steven's Advanced
> Programming in the UNIX Environment, he states:
> "Naturally a signal that is being caught by a process
> that calls exec cannot be caught in the new program,
> since the ad
"Daniel M. Eischen" wrote:
> We don't provide locking for fd's any longer (I thought this was only in
> -current, but your results seem to indicate otherwise). If we did, only
> one thread would wake up. The mistake in your sample seems to be that
> you're having all threads block on the same fd
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:00:40AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Well, the BPF code relies on the ifnet pointer being set or not to
> determine if a packet is "locally sourced". This permits userland
> programs to differentiate packets targeted at a local ethernet address but
> remotely source
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:05:15 +0700 (NOVST)
From: Alexey Privalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: licq & socks5
hi guys..
i`m trying to compiling licq with socks5 support, but i`d received following
message:
c++ -O2 -fno-exceptions -f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Volf) writes:
> Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> > > My system panics with a page fault in one of my kernel loadable modules. I
> > > want to debug this, but I can't find a way to load that module and its
> > > symbol table into gdb.
> > >
> > > The steps that I have taken are
In message <003401c1244d$1fa6ee80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sansonetti Laurent w
rites:
>A another stupid question, how can I do to stop the loading process in
>MOD_LOAD event handler (in my case, if the cfg file doesn't exist, it should
>be better to interrupt..) ?
Someone else might a have better ide
=
Attention: An "english" speaking representative will be contacting
you to verify your correct mailing information prior to shipping
you your FREE special report(s). A valid number is required!
We apologize, but this in
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:27:21PM +0200, Pankaj wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:12:19PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> >
> > I think this is not valid for all protocols ...
> >
>
> > What about this packet?
> >
> > 18:08:56.232653 xxx.xxx.xxx.ssh > yyy.yyy.yyy.863: . ack 369 win 17200
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:12:19PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
> I think this is not valid for all protocols ...
>
> What about this packet?
>
> 18:08:56.232653 xxx.xxx.xxx.ssh > yyy.yyy.yyy.863: . ack 369 win 17200
> (DF) [tos 0x10]
oke dokie baby wants to read ssh packet
mama says
hey
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:37:40PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> I appologize for the next question if it is stuppied.
>
> How can print the IP packet length, matched by tcpdump expression?
>
> I read the tcpdump man page, but I couldn't find the answer of my question!
>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 01:18:52PM -0400, Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
> > We don't provide locking for fd's any longer (I thought this was only in
> > -current, but your results seem to indicate otherwise). If we did, only
> > one thread would wake up. Th
Mike,
Any ideas on the size limitation I'm hitting with the -stable md?
Thanks,
jason
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew J Caines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert J. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:18
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:18:27AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> There has been talk of a "make and mount" command for md that would
> work like mount_md, but it doesn't appear to have materialized
> yet.
man mdmfs
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I'm still curious, what does the POSIX spec say all this?
As far as I know, poll is not described by any POSIX standards.
John
--
John Polstra [EMAIL PROT
Well, the BPF code relies on the ifnet pointer being set or not to
determine if a packet is "locally sourced". This permits userland
programs to differentiate packets targeted at a local ethernet address but
remotely sourced (i.e., looped back) when bridging. "locally sourced"
becomes sort of f
Hi hackers,
I appologize for the next question if it is stuppied.
How can print the IP packet length, matched by tcpdump expression?
I read the tcpdump man page, but I couldn't find the answer of my question!
regards,
Vladimir
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 01:18:52PM -0400, Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
> We don't provide locking for fd's any longer (I thought this was only in
> -current, but your results seem to indicate otherwise). If we did, only
> one thread would wake up. The mistake in your sample seems to be that
> you're
Andrew J Caines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > From what I've read, md is a better way of going than mfs.
> I have seen several references to md being preferred to mfs but have been
> unable to find any detailed comparison or evaluation. To what reference
> were you referring?
md and mfs have two
Is it possible to indicate or better sigbus alignment errors on i386?
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 07:30:08PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> DESCRIPTION
> The mincore() system call allows a process to obtain information about
> whether pages are core resident. Here the current core residency of the
> pages is returned in the character array vec, with a val
32 matches
Mail list logo
