On 08-Apr-01 Attila Nagy wrote:
> So I am wondering, why the unices block mounting an already mounted
> partition read only again.
>
> Would it be possible to solve this under FreeBSD?
Loopback NFS mount, maybe ?
--
E-Mail: Kenneth P. Stox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D
> The ypserv bug (the one where ypserv randomly stops responding or
> just seg-faults) is still very much alive. I had to restart it
> about 11 times in the course of 20 minutes this morning. That's
> the bad news, the good news is that I started it each time with
> 'ktrace -i'.
>
> Also, in the
The ypserv bug (the one where ypserv randomly stops responding or
just seg-faults) is still very much alive. I had to restart it
about 11 times in the course of 20 minutes this morning. That's
the bad news, the good news is that I started it each time with
'ktrace -i'.
Going back a bit, Matt
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:40:43AM -, samrat basuthakur wrote:
> let me know about you peoples and your website.
Us, we're just a bunch of weenies high on LS^H^HBSD, and the website's
www.FreeBSD.org, thanks for your attention :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
I've heard that this sentence is a rumor.
let me know about you peoples and your website.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of t
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 03:07:25AM +0800, ªL^¶W wrote:
> Dear all:
> I trace the FreeBSD kernel source , and I can't find program call the
> function "setitimer()",
>
> Is it a callout function to call it ? I will appreciate if anyone give
> me some advice
setitimer() is defined in s
Hello,
> > So I am wondering, why the unices block mounting an already mounted
> > partition read only again.
> Have you considered using ACLs perhaps? Sure it's not in -STABLE, but
> it's a thought..
It's a good thing, but I need to solve this problem on -STABLE, not on
-CURRENT :(
I think run
7 matches
Mail list logo