David Xu wrote:
> Hello sthaug,
>
> Tuesday, March 06, 2001, 1:24:24 AM, you wrote:
>
> snn> According to the "Maxtor picks Windows, dumps open source" article at
>
> snn> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5009496.html?tag=lh
>
> snn> FreeBSD "did not support large file sizes, Macin
Howdy,
I hadn't booted FreeBSD 3.4 for many months but had mounted
several partitions on /dev/wd2s* from /etc/fstab.
Last week I couldn't get a clean boot 'til I took all references
to /dev/wd2s* out of /etc/fstab.
Having done that I now see:
fbsd:~> mount -t ext2fs /dev/wd2s1 /rh6
[Please don't send HTML e-mail. Also, don't send questions like this
to -hackers.]
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:55:53PM -0800, Louis Thompson wrote:
>I just started using Free-BSD, and am having some problems making it
>see my network adapter on my laptop. It sees the controller fine,
>
Dear Sir,
I just started using Free-BSD, and am having some
problems making it see my network adapter on my laptop. It sees the
controller fine, just not the card itself. The card I am attempting to use
is a 3Com Megahertz 10/100Mb Lan + 56K modem card, model number
3CCFEM656B. Any help
Noted.
Is there a gcc PR associated with this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl
A GNATS searc for "freebsd kernel" didn't return anything.
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Charles Randall
Cc: Andr
:
:This explained in great detail exactly why people are seeing the performance
:they are from the P4 etc. The author knows his stuff.
:
:http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htm
:
:Brandon
Heh heh. You can practically see the sweat popping off his face while
reading his article.
This explained in great detail exactly why people are seeing the performance
they are from the P4 etc. The author knows his stuff.
http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htm
Brandon
:-Original Message-
:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kenneth D. Merry
:Sent:
1. Please send messages like this to questions, not to hackers.
The hackers mailing list is for development discussions, not
Q&A. Thanks.
2. See http://www.daemonnews.org/200103/firewall.html and similar
articles on the net for this kind of information. There are
many beginner's art
:Which begs the question I've tried to ask a number of times in different
:forums. Who's working on P4 optimizations and code generation for the P4?
I'd be happy if GCC -O2 just worked without introducing bugs. I want to
be able to compile the kernel with it again.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:56:46 -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Matt Dillon writes:
> >
> > I modified my original C program again, this time to simply read
> > the data from memory given a block size in kilobytes as an argument.
> > I had to throw in a little __asm to do it ri
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> My understanding is that Intel focused on FP performance in the P4,
> and that it is very, very good at it. I dunno how to test it though.
>From the benchmarks tom's hardware / others did, I got the impression that
SSE2 performance is awesome, b
From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>My understanding is that Intel focused on FP performance in the P4,
>and that it is very, very good at it. I dunno how to test it though.
>
>GCC generally does not produce very good code, but I would expect that
>it would get reasonabl
:How's your P4 for floating point? Is real-life perf as good as the
:specbench numbers would indicate, or do you need a better compiler
:than GCC to get any benefit from it? My wife is a statistician, and
:she runs some really fp intensive workloads. This Athlon is faster
:than the Serverworks
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Gallatin
writes:
>FWIW: 1.2GHz Athlon, VIA Apollo KT133 chipset, Asus A7V motherboard,
>(PC133 ECC Registered Dimms)
Note that the KT does *NOT* support ECC. A few places have claimed it does,
but the VIA chipset spec says it doesn't. The KV or KX does (I
Matt Dillon writes:
>
> I modified my original C program again, this time to simply read
> the data from memory given a block size in kilobytes as an argument.
> I had to throw in a little __asm to do it right, but here are my results.
> It shows about 3.2 GBytes/sec from
[Moved from -hackers to -questions, Followup is set.]
> jett tayer schrieb:
>
> i want to protect my freebsd box from the outside.
> anyone who can help? any sample configs about
> ipfw or ipf. which do u guys prefer of the two?
>
> my box is running:
> named
> apache
> qmail
> popper
You may
I have long log files from multi-threaded multi-program simulations
that output this sort of thing:
> BUS:16:15:35.212525 vme:082a4000 \
irqn: opening shared memory object /var/tmp/vmedir/irqn.bus
> BUS:16:15:35.221792 vme:082a4000 \
irqn: Master opening request FIFO blo
Hola!
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> That could be, assuming that we had any idea just who inside of
> Maxstor to discuss it with. Do you have any names and email
> addresses?
Not personally, but taken from the article about this issue, one person
that obviously knows about this is Steve Wilkins, Maxt
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Re: Machines are getting too damn fast
>
> :throughput. For example, on the PIII-850 (116MHz FSB and SDRAM, its
> :overclocked) here on my desk with 256KB L2 cache:
> :
> :dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=512k count=4000
> :4000+0 records in
> :40
i want to protect my freebsd box from the
outside.
anyone who can help? any sample configs about
ipfw or ipf. which do u guys prefer of the
two?
my box is running:
named
apache
qmail
popper
pls help..
thanks
jett
That could be, assuming that we had any idea just who inside of
Maxstor to discuss it with. Do you have any names and email
addresses?
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Aloha!
Still, wouldn't it be prudent if someone from the project talked to
Maxtor and got some feedback on this? They obviously (or should we
assume conspiracy?) had some real technical issues with FreeBSD, and
also had problems dealing with them properly. Clarification on this
should (could) be
Dear All,
>
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5009496.html?tag=lh
>
Microsoft adjusted its licensing terms for the Maxtor system, Wilkins noted.
Unlike general-purpose servers, a Maxtor machine doesn't require that
customers pay for client access licenses--the fees often required for
compu
23 matches
Mail list logo
