RE: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition

2001-02-21 Thread scanner
http://www.shub-internet.org/brad/FreeBSD/vinum.html Sorry for the delay. It slipped my mind. :-) = -Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Open Sy

Re: portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Matt Dillon
:Is the following portable and safe? : :Given n different structure declarations, where each structure begins :with the same member type, can any instance of any of the structures :be cast to the (pointer) type of the first member? : :e.g. : : struct foo { : const char *s; : ... :

Re: portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: : On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: : > The standard requires that (void *) &foo == (void *) &foo->s : : Thanks, that is what I was trying to track down but couldn't find it. : I also thought that perhaps a st

Re: Build timings - FreeBSD 4.2 vs. Linux

2001-02-21 Thread Robin Cutshaw
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Robin Cutshaw wrote: > > > Have you tuned the FreeBSD kernel? It still ships with a worst-case > > configuration so that it runs optimally on i386 cpus. :-( Copy GENERIC > > to something else and remove all but 'cpu i686', rebuild and install. > > Also,

Re: portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: >> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: >> >: Likewise if the first member were a more com

Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition

2001-02-21 Thread Peter Wemm
Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Aha. That explains it. You use HW raid. I wondered why you were > > only doing 4 million mails for *30* boxes. Dan, is doing 500K, on a > > completely idle box (cpu/ram/I/O wise), with vinum, Postfix, and RAID-0. > > Ha

portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
Is the following portable and safe? Given n different structure declarations, where each structure begins with the same member type, can any instance of any of the structures be cast to the (pointer) type of the first member? e.g. struct foo { const char *s; ... }; struc

Îáðàùàþñü ê Âàì ñ ïðîñüáîé ïîìî÷ü ìíå â ïðèîáðåòåíèè ëåêàðñòâà

2001-02-21 Thread lepeshkinan
Title: Îáðàùàþñü ê Âàì ñ ïðîñüáîé ïîìî÷ü ìíå â ïðèîáðåòåíèè ëåêàðñòâà Óâàæàåìûå ãîñïîäà! Îáðàùàþñü ê Âàì ñ ïðîñüáîé ïîìî÷ü ìíå â ïðèîáðåòåíèè ëåêàðñòâà. Åñëè áû ýòî íå áûë âîïðîñ æèçíè è ñìåðòè, ÿ áû íèêîãäà íå ðåøèëàñü îáðàòèòüñÿ ê Âàì. Íî ýòîò ïðåïàðàò äëÿ ìåíÿ - ïîñëåäíÿÿ âîçìîæíî

Re: Build timings - FreeBSD 4.2 vs. Linux

2001-02-21 Thread Robin Cutshaw
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:21:26PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build > > on FreeBSD? > > This is probably a silly question, but you did recompile the kernel for > SMP, right? > Actually, I was using the stock GENERIC UP kernel

Re: portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: >: Likewise if the first member were a more complex data type, but >: nevertheless the same between the different structures. >: >: It seems safe to me, but I can't explain why :-) > >

Interface alias accounting

2001-02-21 Thread Michael R. Wayne
Back on Nov 7, 2000, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> answered my query regarding per alias accounting, suggesting that the solution was in current and would MFC after 4.2 was released. 4.2 was released, any idea when this might show up into stable? /\/\ \/\/ > On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:

Re: Build timings - FreeBSD 4.2 vs. Linux

2001-02-21 Thread David Malone
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:36:18AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Robin Cutshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010221 06:07] wrote: > > > > OK, I set softupdates on the disk/partition that the build source/target > > is on. It made no difference in timing. I then created a memory disk, > > set softup

Re: Bug in creating ICMP error messages in FreeBSD4.2

2001-02-21 Thread idobarnea
>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:26:56PM +0100, mouss wrote: >> At 14:25 19/02/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >Hi, >> > I encountered the following problem in the 4.2 version. >> >In ip_forward, the following lines intend to save the mbuf in case we want to >> >send ICMP error later: >> > mco

Re: portability sanity check

2001-02-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: : When you say ``resort to C macros,'' do you mean macros to hide the : `type punning', or do you have something else in mind? I had the queue macros in mind. Hiding the type punning behind a macro helps make sure it is used right, but

Re: Creating BSD bootable CD

2001-02-21 Thread Murray Stokely
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % I hadn't heard of mkhybrid, so investigated: it's been merged into mkisofs: I still prefer old versions of mkhybrid over the new merged mkisofs for some tricky environments. The new mkisofs will coredump with very large hybrid discs

Re: OpenSSH 2.5.1

2001-02-21 Thread Tomoyuki Murakami
>>> In OpenSSH 2.5.1 >>> I wrote: tomoyuki> tomoyuki> http://www.c-wind.com/~tomo/230-250.diff.gz correct url is http://www.c-wind.com/~tomo/230-251.diff.gz I'm very sorry for this. tomoyuki> - /usr/src/crypto/openssh diffs tomoyuki> -

Re: Fwd: Re: Re: postfix: No buffer space available

2001-02-21 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Len Conrad wrote: > > > >kern.ipc.maxsockets = 5000 > > >kern.ipc.maxsockbuf = 524288 > > > > > >But neither parameter takes effect. > > If the sysctl's are read only that you want to change slap them in > your /boot/loader.rc > > \ Inc

Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition

2001-02-21 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Aha. That explains it. You use HW raid. I wondered why you were > only doing 4 million mails for *30* boxes. Dan, is doing 500K, on a > completely idle box (cpu/ram/I/O wise), with vinum, Postfix, and RAID-0. > Have you seen brad knowles papers

RE: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition

2001-02-21 Thread Laurence Brockman
I'd be interested in the URL :) Thanks, Laurence -- Laurence Brockman Unix Administrator Videon Cablesystems Alberta Inc 10450-178 St. Edmonton, AB T5S 1S2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (780) 486-6527 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 20,

Re: Creating BSD bootable CD

2001-02-21 Thread Ragnar Beer
Hi! In a recent thread on freebsd-stable there were a couple of postings that I copied for you. Nevermind posted: -- I've asked about this before. So that's my howto: 1. You will need the while cvs repository preferabl

Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition

2001-02-21 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > We use Alteon load balancers to take care of the balancing part, after > that, qmail just works. We did add a hack for a deferral server option to > qmail, meaning after 10 minutes of undeliverable mail (configurable), the > mail gets tossed to another