http://www.shub-internet.org/brad/FreeBSD/vinum.html
Sorry for the delay. It slipped my mind. :-)
=
-Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Open Sy
:Is the following portable and safe?
:
:Given n different structure declarations, where each structure begins
:with the same member type, can any instance of any of the structures
:be cast to the (pointer) type of the first member?
:
:e.g.
:
: struct foo {
: const char *s;
: ...
:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
: On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > The standard requires that (void *) &foo == (void *) &foo->s
:
: Thanks, that is what I was trying to track down but couldn't find it.
: I also thought that perhaps a st
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Robin Cutshaw wrote:
>
> > Have you tuned the FreeBSD kernel? It still ships with a worst-case
> > configuration so that it runs optimally on i386 cpus. :-( Copy GENERIC
> > to something else and remove all but 'cpu i686', rebuild and install.
> > Also,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
>On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
>> >: Likewise if the first member were a more com
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aha. That explains it. You use HW raid. I wondered why you were
> > only doing 4 million mails for *30* boxes. Dan, is doing 500K, on a
> > completely idle box (cpu/ram/I/O wise), with vinum, Postfix, and RAID-0.
> > Ha
Is the following portable and safe?
Given n different structure declarations, where each structure begins
with the same member type, can any instance of any of the structures
be cast to the (pointer) type of the first member?
e.g.
struct foo {
const char *s;
...
};
struc
Title: Îáðàùàþñü ê Âàì ñ ïðîñüáîé ïîìî÷ü ìíå â ïðèîáðåòåíèè ëåêàðñòâà
Óâàæàåìûå ãîñïîäà!
Îáðàùàþñü ê Âàì ñ ïðîñüáîé ïîìî÷ü ìíå â ïðèîáðåòåíèè ëåêàðñòâà. Åñëè áû ýòî íå áûë âîïðîñ æèçíè è ñìåðòè, ÿ áû íèêîãäà íå ðåøèëàñü îáðàòèòüñÿ ê Âàì. Íî ýòîò ïðåïàðàò äëÿ ìåíÿ - ïîñëåäíÿÿ âîçìîæíî
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:21:26PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> >
> > Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build
> > on FreeBSD?
>
> This is probably a silly question, but you did recompile the kernel for
> SMP, right?
>
Actually, I was using the stock GENERIC UP kernel
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
>: Likewise if the first member were a more complex data type, but
>: nevertheless the same between the different structures.
>:
>: It seems safe to me, but I can't explain why :-)
>
>
Back on Nov 7, 2000, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> answered
my query regarding per alias accounting, suggesting that the solution
was in current and would MFC after 4.2 was released.
4.2 was released, any idea when this might show up into stable?
/\/\ \/\/
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:36:18AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Robin Cutshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010221 06:07] wrote:
> >
> > OK, I set softupdates on the disk/partition that the build source/target
> > is on. It made no difference in timing. I then created a memory disk,
> > set softup
>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:26:56PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>> At 14:25 19/02/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> > I encountered the following problem in the 4.2 version.
>> >In ip_forward, the following lines intend to save the mbuf in case we want
to
>> >send ICMP error later:
>> > mco
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes:
: When you say ``resort to C macros,'' do you mean macros to hide the
: `type punning', or do you have something else in mind?
I had the queue macros in mind. Hiding the type punning behind a
macro helps make sure it is used right, but
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% I hadn't heard of mkhybrid, so investigated: it's been merged into mkisofs:
I still prefer old versions of mkhybrid over the new merged mkisofs
for some tricky environments. The new mkisofs will coredump with very
large hybrid discs
>>> In OpenSSH 2.5.1
>>> I wrote:
tomoyuki>
tomoyuki> http://www.c-wind.com/~tomo/230-250.diff.gz
correct url is
http://www.c-wind.com/~tomo/230-251.diff.gz
I'm very sorry for this.
tomoyuki> - /usr/src/crypto/openssh diffs
tomoyuki> -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Len Conrad wrote:
>
> > >kern.ipc.maxsockets = 5000
> > >kern.ipc.maxsockbuf = 524288
> > >
> > >But neither parameter takes effect.
>
> If the sysctl's are read only that you want to change slap them in
> your /boot/loader.rc
>
> \ Inc
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aha. That explains it. You use HW raid. I wondered why you were
> only doing 4 million mails for *30* boxes. Dan, is doing 500K, on a
> completely idle box (cpu/ram/I/O wise), with vinum, Postfix, and RAID-0.
> Have you seen brad knowles papers
I'd be interested in the URL :)
Thanks,
Laurence
--
Laurence Brockman
Unix Administrator
Videon Cablesystems Alberta Inc
10450-178 St.
Edmonton, AB
T5S 1S2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(780) 486-6527
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20,
Hi! In a recent thread on freebsd-stable there were a couple of
postings that I copied for you.
Nevermind posted:
--
I've asked about this before. So that's my howto:
1. You will need the while cvs repository preferabl
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> We use Alteon load balancers to take care of the balancing part, after
> that, qmail just works. We did add a hack for a deferral server option to
> qmail, meaning after 10 minutes of undeliverable mail (configurable), the
> mail gets tossed to another
21 matches
Mail list logo