Sorry about the other one. I intended to start over. I did but not the
way I wanted :(.
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > > One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> > > longer on all of my systems. That goes against what ever
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > > One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> > > longer on all of my systems. That goes against what everyone claims
> > > should happen.
> >
> > With how many running processors? If you're ru
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > It was a uniprocessor system. The folklore has it doing more but all I
>
> You've been listening to the wrong folklore then, that's all. :)
True but that is what section 19.4.6.5 in the Handbook implies. It
also reads for -current but it has said that since 3.x was
On Tue 2001-02-13 (07:09), Lists Account wrote:
> Ok this is getting a bit strange. Interestingly enough ssh works 100%
> with my method of tty creation, having created (from outside the
> jail) ttyp32 - ttyp100 (with the minor/major numbers set as 5,XX where XX
> is ttypXX), and a mknod type of
> It was a uniprocessor system. The folklore has it doing more but all I
You've been listening to the wrong folklore then, that's all. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> > longer on all of my systems. That goes against what everyone claims
> > should happen.
>
> With how many running processors? If you're running -j4 on a
> uniprocessor system, you're only introduci
> One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> longer on all of my systems. That goes against what everyone claims
> should happen.
With how many running processors? If you're running -j4 on a
uniprocessor system, you're only introducing competition for already
scarce CPU r
Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 4.2 on my laptop and it has a a PCMCIA ethernet adapter. It
> is a L100C32 Dynalink 10/100Mbps 32bit Ethernet Adapter.
>
> The system don't find it when it boots (I think). I use all the PCMCIA options to
> BOOT, and I when I use
Aled Morris wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> >Even the name (dd) comes from IBM's control language (JSYS?).
>
> I don't disagree, but someone once told me the name came from what
> it does "Convert and Copy a file" - see dd(1) - but "cc" was already
> taken...
dd == devic
Hi,
Ok this is getting a bit strange. Interestingly enough ssh works 100%
with my method of tty creation, having created (from outside the
jail) ttyp32 - ttyp100 (with the minor/major numbers set as 5,XX where XX
is ttypXX), and a mknod type of c, ssh allocates ttys fine, however screen
still te
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:20:55 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question.
> > >
> > > In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs.
> ADSL
> > > seems like a good inex
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> longer on all of my systems. That goes against what everyone claims
> should happen.
More concurrent jobs means more contention and more overhead.
Increasing the number of jobs boosts per
Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> :Thunderbird 900, with 256 MB of PC-133 memory, and using 3 - ATA-66
> :HD's on different controllers. The elapsed time dropped from 58:16 to
> :45:54 by using softupdates.
> :
> :Kent
>
> That sounds about right for -pipe. The original email was
> 1 hour vs 40
:Thunderbird 900, with 256 MB of PC-133 memory, and using 3 - ATA-66
:HD's on different controllers. The elapsed time dropped from 58:16 to
:45:54 by using softupdates.
:
:Kent
That sounds about right for -pipe. The original email was
1 hour vs 40 minutes, a 20 minute difference which se
Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
> If RAM bandwidth was the bottleneck here then putting /usr/src and
> /usr/obj into an MFS would have represented a pessimization over
> simply leaving that on disk.
Don't be so su
> Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain
> > point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck.
>
> More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
If RAM bandwidth was the bottleneck here then putting /
Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain
> point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck.
More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe:
Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> :> In fact, it's exactly the opposite. 'make world' is CPU-bound, so the
> :> speed of the I/O system is irrelevant. If it were I/O bound, soft
> :> updates *would* make a difference, because a number of unnecessary
> :> writes would be eliminated.
> :
> :Read what he w
> In fact, it's exactly the opposite. 'make world' is CPU-bound, so the
> speed of the I/O system is irrelevant. If it were I/O bound, soft
> updates *would* make a difference, because a number of unnecessary
> writes would be eliminated.
Actually, I have measured that after a certain point mak
:> In fact, it's exactly the opposite. 'make world' is CPU-bound, so the
:> speed of the I/O system is irrelevant. If it were I/O bound, soft
:> updates *would* make a difference, because a number of unnecessary
:> writes would be eliminated.
:
:Read what he writes. Soft updates *did* make a di
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010212 15:23] wrote:
> On Monday, 12 February 2001 at 15:29:17 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> i've been doing some experiments with vinum, and doing a make buildworld
> >> (with obj on the same vinum)
> >>w
Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact, it's exactly the opposite. 'make world' is CPU-bound, so the
> speed of the I/O system is irrelevant. If it were I/O bound, soft
> updates *would* make a difference, because a number of unnecessary
> writes would be eliminated.
Read what he writ
On Monday, 12 February 2001 at 15:29:17 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i've been doing some experiments with vinum, and doing a make buildworld
>> (with obj on the same vinum)
>> without soft-updates~ 1 hour
>> with soft-updates
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> }It its the bios disk probe that is causing the machine to fault.
>
> I can now confirm that it's a divide by zero in the Adaptec BIOS GRR.
> (in biosdisk, when 'probing' the adaptec) a
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
At 2:01 PM + 2/12/01, Aled Morris wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>>Even the name (dd) comes from IBM's control language (JSYS?).
>
>I don't disagree, but someone once told me the name came from
>what it does "Convert and Copy a file" - see dd(1) - but "cc"
>was already taken
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:01:55PM +, Aled Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> >Even the name (dd) comes from IBM's control language (JSYS?).
>
> I don't disagree, but someone once told me the name came from what
> it does "Convert and Copy a file" - see dd(1) - but "
Bill Paul writes:
> > > This is a call for testers for a netgraph module that can be used to
> > > aggregate 2 or 4 ethernet interfaces into a single interface. Basically,
> > > it lets you do things like the following:
>
> You know, so far I've gotten close to a dozen replies to this e-mail,
> b
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:20:55 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question.
> >
> > In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs.
ADSL
> > seems like a good inexpensive solution, and I understand that F
I got a message saying
This user's mail account has been disabled. Probably because their mail is
over quota. We're sorry for any inconvenience.
Engineering Computer Services
University of Michigan-Dearborn
when I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I resent to freebsd-hackers just in
case, sorry
T
I asked this same question on -questions I'm hoping this list will be more
fruitful as I didn't get a single reply :( thanks
I have a dlink di-701 that I would like to use with PPPoE to connect to a
freebsd 3.5s PPPoED server
when I connect via raspppoe I have no problems, however if I try to co
Tony m wrote:
>
> I asked this same question on -questions I'm hoping this list will be more
> fruitful as I didn't get a single reply :( thanks
>
> I have a dlink di-701 that I would like to use with PPPoE to connect to a
> freebsd 3.5s PPPoED server
>
> when I connect via raspppoe I have no p
At 11:02 AM 02/12/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
>In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs. ADSL
>seems like a good inexpensive solution, and I understand that FreeBSD with
>Netgraph can act like a gateway for our computers
I asked this same question on -questions I'm hoping this list will be more
fruitful as I didn't get a single reply :( thanks
I have a dlink di-701 that I would like to use with PPPoE to connect to a
freebsd 3.5s PPPoED server
when I connect via raspppoe I have no problems, however if I try to co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
> In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs. ADSL
> seems like a good inexpensive solution, and I understand that FreeBSD with
> Netgraph can act like a gateway for our computers.
are they in d
I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question.
In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs. ADSL
seems like a good inexpensive solution, and I understand that FreeBSD with
Netgraph can act like a gateway for our computers.
What I don't understand is whether we will have to
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Lists Account wrote:
> Just a quick question Im hoping someone can help me with. I extended
> the number of pty's available on my base box just fine, with an edit to
> /etc/ttys and making some new devices, then just a kill -1 1, and
> everything worked fine.
>
> I did ex
Hello,
The discussion originated a few days ago in -mobile about some problems
with the Dell Inspiron fan reminded me of an old question about APM and
idle cycles: why is apm_cpu_idle() not used at all in the kernel? I have
just checked NetBSD and OpenBSD's sys/arch/i386/i386/locore.s and both
co
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i've been doing some experiments with vinum, and doing a make buildworld
> (with obj on the same vinum)
> without soft-updates~ 1 hour
> with soft-updates ~ 40 minutes
> which is a bit better than 3% :-)
>
> what i can't figure out
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>Even the name (dd) comes from IBM's control language (JSYS?).
I don't disagree, but someone once told me the name came from what
it does "Convert and Copy a file" - see dd(1) - but "cc" was already
taken...
Aled
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
Hi All,
Just a quick question Im hoping someone can help me with. I extended the
number of pty's available on my base box just fine, with an edit to
/etc/ttys and making some new devices, then just a kill -1 1, and
everything worked fine.
I did exactly the same thing under the jail, it didnt wo
Hi everyone.
I have installed FreeBSD 4.2 on my laptop and it has a a PCMCIA ethernet adapter. It
is a L100C32 Dynalink 10/100Mbps 32bit Ethernet Adapter.
The system don't find it when it boots (I think). I use all the PCMCIA options to
BOOT, and I when I use ifconfig I see this interfaces:
fai
Title:
¡¡
¡¡
43 matches
Mail list logo
