Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > Yeah, there are definite dns problems. It does still resolve here, though
> > - you must be especially unlucky.
>
> Nevermind, ftp.freesoftware.com purged itself from my cache. ftp2+ still
> seem to work fine, though.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Yeah, there are definite dns problems. It does still resolve here, though
> - you must be especially unlucky.
Nevermind, ftp.freesoftware.com purged itself from my cache. ftp2+ still
seem to work fine, though.
/me sighs about the evilness of CNAM
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Greg Black wrote:
> "Dan Langille" wrote:
>
> > On 31 Jan 2001, at 13:51, Greg Black wrote:
> >
> > > Can you name one? I mean a mirror that doesn't send you to
> > > ftp.FreeBSD.org for security patches etc, which is what happens
> > > on the mirrors I've tried -- they see
On 31 Jan 2001, at 13:59, Greg Black wrote:
> "Dan Langille" wrote:
>
> > On 31 Jan 2001, at 13:51, Greg Black wrote:
> >
> > > Can you name one? I mean a mirror that doesn't send you to
> > > ftp.FreeBSD.org for security patches etc, which is what happens
> > > on the mirrors I've tried -- th
"Dan Langille" wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2001, at 13:51, Greg Black wrote:
>
> > Can you name one? I mean a mirror that doesn't send you to
> > ftp.FreeBSD.org for security patches etc, which is what happens
> > on the mirrors I've tried -- they seem to mirror the html stuff
> > only ...
>
> look for
Well, then, no,
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > > I've been trying to lookup ftp.FreeBSD.org for the last couple
> > > of hours and getting timeouts and other silly stuff.
> > >
> > > Can anybody give me an IP address please?
> >
> > Looks like it got swallowed. Try a mirror? There are oodles...
On 31 Jan 2001, at 13:51, Greg Black wrote:
> Can you name one? I mean a mirror that doesn't send you to
> ftp.FreeBSD.org for security patches etc, which is what happens
> on the mirrors I've tried -- they seem to mirror the html stuff
> only ...
look for yourself:
http://freebsdmirrors.org/
Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > I've been trying to lookup ftp.FreeBSD.org for the last couple
> > of hours and getting timeouts and other silly stuff.
> >
> > Can anybody give me an IP address please?
>
> Looks like it got swallowed. Try a mirror? There are oodles...
Can you name one? I mean a mirr
Looks like it got swallowed. Try a mirror? There are oodles...
> I've been trying to lookup ftp.FreeBSD.org for the last couple
> of hours and getting timeouts and other silly stuff.
>
> Can anybody give me an IP address please?
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "uns
I've been trying to lookup ftp.FreeBSD.org for the last couple
of hours and getting timeouts and other silly stuff.
Can anybody give me an IP address please?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Chris Csanady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >The patch below for arla fixes the problem.
> >
> >> I believe that this might also be what is causing linux-netscape
> >> to wedge the machine (with home directories on afs), although I'm
> >> not positive.
>
> This patch does fix the directory prob
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 30 Jan 2001, at 3:19, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > > of filtering is necessary though. Unless, somebody thinks that this is
> > > "censorship", and a new flame about humans rights spawns out o
:Yep. I only thought I should keep the layering by using VOPs. But you
:are right, swap_pager and vm_swap are dependent anyway, so this can
:be justified, and things are not duplicated over the whole file.
:So, is it OK with you if I do it the way you described?
:
: - thomas
Yes, I th
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:17:55PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> : VOP_SWAPACCOUNT(nbp->b_vp, nbp);
> : BUF_KERNPROC(nbp);
> : BUF_STRATEGY(nbp);
> :
> :Now, I have to define the vop in vm_swap.c, where I can get the area
> :index from the block number in a cle
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2001, at 3:19, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> > of filtering is necessary though. Unless, somebody thinks that this is
> > "censorship", and a new flame about humans rights spawns out of nowhere.
>
> We're not stopping anyone from saying anythi
: VOP_SWAPACCOUNT(nbp->b_vp, nbp);
: BUF_KERNPROC(nbp);
: BUF_STRATEGY(nbp);
:
:Now, I have to define the vop in vm_swap.c, where I can get the area
:index from the block number in a clean way and frob my counters.
:The same method could be used in swap_p
>Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have discovered a rather interesting bug with this combination,
>> and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction
>> to help me track it down.
>>
>> The problem is that linux binaries which call getdirents on an afs
>> directory do not
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:21:38PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> :vm.swapdev1.total (this is the one that is currently hard to get)
> You can't move swapinfo into the kernel as a sysctl unless you
> solve this problem. Traversing the radix tree is expensive enough
> that the entire sys
:vm.swapdev1.total (this is the one that is currently hard to get)
You can't move swapinfo into the kernel as a sysctl unless you
solve this problem. Traversing the radix tree is expensive enough
that the entire system will stall for a short period of time if you run
the loop in
Hi,
I'm going to start working on making top work without setgid kmem.
Is anyone already doing this? I don't want to waste my time...
Most kmem_read calls are easy to replace (the variables are already
exported as sysctls), the only exception is nextproc (for which I might
add a sysctl, or ju
Hi, what is this? I got this with FreeBSD-4.2-stable from yesterday.
~ 118 % ping www.think.com
PING www1.think.com (63.210.36.229): 56 data bytes
ping in free(): warning: modified (chunk-) pointer.
64 bytes from 63.210.36.229: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=170.143 ms
^C
--- www1.think.com ping statist
On 30 Jan 2001, at 3:19, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> of filtering is necessary though. Unless, somebody thinks that this is
> "censorship", and a new flame about humans rights spawns out of nowhere.
We're not stopping anyone from saying anything. We're just stopping
them from saying it on our
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:00:02PM +1100, Patryk Zadarnowski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:23:48 -0800 (PST), Hahaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and
> > polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they prom
Hi,
I am having problems using gdb to debug my application. my application is
using linuxthreads on FreeBSD v4.2-STABLE. i am using GNU gdb 4.18.
I read that GDB needs to be patched in order to be able to debug
applications using linuxthreads. However, the patch I found only made
modificat
* Kevin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:56] wrote:
> "Jeff Roberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is that true in -CURRENT as well? It looks to me like it calls kevents with
> > a 0 timespec and then calls into the scheduler.
> >
> > > * Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:05
"Jeff Roberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is that true in -CURRENT as well? It looks to me like it calls kevents with
> a 0 timespec and then calls into the scheduler.
>
> > * Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:05] wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pth
* Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:15] wrote:
> Is that true in -CURRENT as well? It looks to me like it calls kevents with
> a 0 timespec and then calls into the scheduler.
libc_r tries most operations non-blocking before resorting to using
poll(), this is what it's doing.
>
> >
Title: RE: Kevents/libc_r ?
Is that true in -CURRENT as well? It looks to me like it calls kevents with a 0 timespec and then calls into the scheduler.
> * Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:05] wrote:
> > Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pthreads yet? I poked
> >
* Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010130 11:05] wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pthreads yet? I poked
> around and saw that it is handled in libc_r/uthread, but I also noticed that
> my process that should be waiting in kqread is actually waiting in poll. If
> I rem
Title: Kevents/libc_r ?
Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pthreads yet? I poked around and saw that it is handled in libc_r/uthread, but I also noticed that my process that should be waiting in kqread is actually waiting in poll. If I remove -pthread from the compile line it
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 06:30:14PM +, James wrote:
> ftp.freebsd.org:/.0/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.1-release/Latest/40upgrade
> .tgz
>
> However, I'm not sure this will let you use ports now.
Thanks! I just need this to get the 4.0-RELEASE system I am dealing with
upgraded so I can cvs
ftp.freebsd.org:/.0/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.1-release/Latest/40upgrade
.tgz
However, I'm not sure this will let you use ports now.
Josef Grosch writes:
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the file 40upgrade.tgz? I went to the
> ports page off the main FreeBSD page and tried to get
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Steve Shoecraft wrote:
>
> Were you able to get testmod to work?
The problem came from the fact that I was recompiling some of
the pci files. They were locally linked to my module producing
the wrongs results I got.
Sent to -hackers to close the s
Does anyone know what happened to the file 40upgrade.tgz? I went to the
ports page off the main FreeBSD page and tried to get the "4.0 to 4-STABLE
upgrade kit" but got an error message saying the file was not found. I
poked around on the ftp site and could not find it. Any ideas?
Josef
--
Jos
At 07:48 AM 01/30/2001, Suma H R wrote:
>Hi,
> We are writing a network device driver for an ethernet interface
>network card.
>The hardware IRQ status register shows an Interrupt to be Pending.
>But, vmstat -i doesn't show any interrupts from our device.
>Any idea why it could be happeni
Hi all,
I found a bug in the FreeBSD kernel today(it's 4.2-STABLE, cvsupped today).
It is related to kevents and the umount -f option(forcibly unmounting of a
filesystem).
The bug is easily reproducible by running this simple shell script:
#/bin/sh
while true
do
mount /cdrom
t
> wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa
> wdc0: unit 0 (wd0):
> wd0: 6187MB (12672450 sectors), 13410 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T,
> 512 B/S
> wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 on isa
> wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable,
> accel, dma, iordis
> acd0: drive speed 5512KB/sec, 256KB cache
> acd0: supported read ty
> > Also the content of SSH_CLIENT may be of intereset (namely the
> remote IP)
> > and I don't know how to retrieve that information after
> SSH_CLIENT has been
> > clobbered.
>
> What do you mean? The variable is still there, it's just not
> exported. If
> you want to export it, do so.
How
> > The tradeoff bash makes is to remove the export attribute from SSH_CLIENT
> > if it exists in the shell's initial environment. Users may always export
> > it explicitly.
>
> This is what I figured from reading the code, however not exporting
> SSH_CLIENT is not enough to really achieve this
Hi,
> Bash uses the presence of SSH_CLIENT to decide whether or not to run the
> shell startup files for a non-interactive shell (like it attempts to do
> for rsh). The problem is that if the variable is exported, subsequent
> invocations of non-interactive shells will source the startup files.
> > However I found that if the login shell of the user is set to bash (version
> > 2.03 or 2.04 at least), this variable is never set. Upon inspection of the
> > code for bash, it appears that bash is explicitely removing the definition
> > of this environment variable. Would anybody have an idea
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
}>i did the vinum stuff again, but now im getting all kind of errors.
}>btw, the kernel is of this morning (4.2 cvsuped this morning - local time), i
}>noticed some fixes to the aic7xxx.
}
}You have a bad cable or terminator. The 7899 runs quite a bit fas
vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I am new to FreeBSD. I wanted to know if I can play audio
> CDs on "my" system.
'man cdcontrol'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi,
We are writing a network device driver for an ethernet interface
network card.
The hardware IRQ status register shows an Interrupt to be Pending.
But, vmstat -i doesn't show any interrupts from our device.
Any idea why it could be happening?
Thanks,
Suma
To Unsubscribe: send mail
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
| In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| >>> What am I doing wrong? Given a diameter of appr. 7cm, I'd come at appr
| >>> 0.7Mach. Does that mean that within a few years my machine will go
| >>> KABOOM when booting?
| >>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>>> What am I doing wrong? Given a diameter of appr. 7cm, I'd come at appr
>>> 0.7Mach. Does that mean that within a few years my machine will go
>>> KABOOM when booting?
>>
>> I have a 15K rpm drive if you want to do a recalculation. I
On 30 Jan, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Mark Huizer wrote:
>> > |
>> > | Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
>> >
>> > That's acceleration not velocity :-)
>> >
>> > The terminal velocity of a PC case is probably a lot lower than the
>> > velocity of an outer edge of a 1 RPM drive.
>> >
>> What am I
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
PW>Mark Huizer wrote:
PW>> > |
PW>> > | Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
PW>> >
PW>> > That's acceleration not velocity :-)
PW>> >
PW>> > The terminal velocity of a PC case is probably a lot lower than the
PW>> > velocity of an outer edge of a 1 RPM
Mark Huizer wrote:
> > |
> > | Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
> >
> > That's acceleration not velocity :-)
> >
> > The terminal velocity of a PC case is probably a lot lower than the
> > velocity of an outer edge of a 1 RPM drive.
> >
> What am I doing wrong? Given a diameter of appr. 7
> |
> | Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
>
> That's acceleration not velocity :-)
>
> The terminal velocity of a PC case is probably a lot lower than the
> velocity of an outer edge of a 1 RPM drive.
>
What am I doing wrong? Given a diameter of appr. 7cm, I'd come at appr
0.7Mach. Does th
>
> > I think Yahoo! is using still on 2.2.8.
>
> Don't let your imagination run away with you. :)
>
Ok, ok. I just tried to say that there are still 2.2.8 users around with
Yahoo! as an example. :-)
Kees Jan
You are only young once,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:09:30PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing some script that looks for the SSH_CLIENT environment variable.
> As specified in the sshd(8) man page, this variable should contain the IP
> address of the client, the port number on the client side and th
52 matches
Mail list logo
