John Polstra wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've got a Belkin OmniView Pro 8-Port KVM switch which thinks it's
> > much smarter than it really is. When I try to use the mouse through
> > it with FreeBSD (-current from around Christma
"Dan Langille" wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2001, at 16:33, Greg Black wrote:
>
> > We'd need some guarantees that the attempt to maintain current
> > behaviour was done correctly -- i.e., without introducing bugs
> > that broke things.
>
> What sort of guarantees are acceptable?
It would need to be tes
On 11 Jan 2001, at 16:33, Greg Black wrote:
> We'd need some guarantees that the attempt to maintain current
> behaviour was done correctly -- i.e., without introducing bugs
> that broke things.
What sort of guarantees are acceptable?
> In the beginning, something like CRON_DST_HACK="NO" in rc.
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> I take notice of your (and Greg Black's) reservation / being
> opposed, respect it and conclude that the change will have to
> - default to the current behaviour (something quite usual for
> expanding changes)
We'd need some guarantees that the attempt to maintain curre
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:21:59PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > I bought 3.3 CD's from Walnut Creek and use BSD at home, but that
> >has a IDE disk. This is my first attempt at installing one with SCSI.
> >Upgrading to 4.x is not an option.
>
> FreeBSD 3.3 does not include support for t
> I bought 3.3 CD's from Walnut Creek and use BSD at home, but that
>has a IDE disk. This is my first attempt at installing one with SCSI.
>Upgrading to 4.x is not an option.
FreeBSD 3.3 does not include support for the 7892.
IIRC 3.4 and all releases after it, supports the 7892.
--
Justi
Hi All,
I don't know if this is the appropriate forum, but nevertheless.
I have a HP Kayak XU 800. This machine has a Adaptec AIC-7892
SCSI controller and a quantum hard disk (Atlas 10k). I tried to
install FreeBSD 3.3 on this machine, but the hardware probe is unable to
probe th
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Peter Haight wrote:
> I rebuilt mozilla after upgrading to 4.2 and was getting an assertion
> because pthread_attr_setschedparam() was failing with a ENOTSUP. It turns
> out Mozilla was trying to set the thread priority to 42 which is above the
> new limit of 31 which changed
On 11-Jan-01 Robert Watson wrote:
> not to (which there may be), I'd like to commit changes to -CURRENT's
> /etc/default/rc.conf to change the default hostname to "localhost". If
> the user configures a hostname, or DHCP provides one, it will be
> overridden, of course, so should not impact
I rebuilt mozilla after upgrading to 4.2 and was getting an assertion
because pthread_attr_setschedparam() was failing with a ENOTSUP. It turns
out Mozilla was trying to set the thread priority to 42 which is above the
new limit of 31 which changed a little before 4.2-RELEASE.
To patch mozilla I
[ note to nbm: would you like getting cc'ed, too? I'm used to
keep receiver lists as short as possible, but feel free to state
your wishes :) ]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> >
> > Now, consider NTP calibrations,
>
> . . .
>
> Your exam
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:14 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >
> > It's not that I want to talk you into something you don't
> > want.
>
> But that's exactly what you're trying to do.
Honestly -- no! :) OK, I've been unclear there. I did reply to
your message, but writing
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:20:43PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> John Polstra wrote:
> >
> > I'm happy to report that this problem is solved now. After one fellow
> > wrote to me and reported that his switch of the same model worked OK,
> > I hunted around on the Belkin web site. It turns out tha
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> On Wed 2001-01-10 (21:35), Greg Black wrote:
>
> To summarise: It is broken, we have the fix,
No. You believe it is broken; you believe you have a fix. Not
everybody agrees that it is broken or that any fix is required.
> > Fiddling with cron to work around inco
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:23:13PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> /etc/default/rc.conf to change the default hostname to "localhost". If
> the user configures a hostname, or DHCP provides one, it will be
> overridden, of course, so should not impact any configuration but one
> where the hostname i
Under FreeBSD, the default hostname in /etc/defaults/rc.conf is currently
an empty string, "". If the hostname is not later defined, then the
system will use this through multi-user mode, which can disrupt
application behavior. This can occur if DHCP doesn't provide a hostname,
or if the user n
Chris wrote:
>
> I am attempting to add some functionality to the loader, but have come
> across a minor problem. Is there some way to include forth files,
> given a string?
>
> s" file" included (gforth example)
Yes, there is... I just can't recall the exact name right now. :-)
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:29:03AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20010103 03:55], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Hi. I have a netgear Ethernet card installed in my computer. In order
> >to reconnect my computer to the internet, I have to reinstall the
> >drive
Ok i fixed itnfsbufs or something and maxusers i increased
solved this problem.
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Daniel Hagan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:43 -0500
> From: Daniel Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: apache PMAP_SHP
Hi !
I am working on some modifications in the netinet code. I therefore
want as little intereferences/side affects as possible.
I would like real time conditions ... but I think thats just an illusion :)
However, I want to minimize the effects done by userland processes,
getty,login,cron et cet
Ya i checked that out already. netstat -m seems fine.
What I am trying to do is move apache off this linux box
to a freebsd one to split up the load. I leave mysql on linux box for
the SMP.
currently I have it moved back to linux box till I can fix this error.
Here are some error logs from li
Are you running out of mbufs? Try running netstat -m and comparing peak
and max mbuf allocations. If you're running out, you'll need to
recompile your kernel (I can't remember the option off-hand, but it
should be in LINT).
Daniel
Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> I have tried much ..increasing limits i
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 10/01, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> | Presumably at some point in the stack, that notification is translated
> | from a hardware event, which might be associated with devd in some manner
> | (and possibly also exposed there).
>
> This is the ideal si
I have tried much ..increasing limits in the kernel etc
real questions is ..how do you increase the socket buffer space?
--
example
230 User dphoenix logged in.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> ls
ftp: socket: No buffer space availab
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> To summarise: It is broken,
According to your definition of broken, which we have not
necessarily reached a consensus on.
> Not only that, but people who don't understand that it is broken are
> unable to understand simple facts.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 2001-01-09 (02:14), Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > The point I'm trying (obviously in vain) to make is having cron do what
> > amounts to "slewing
Well, we've obviously hit a hot button issue for you here Neil,
for reasons that I don't pretend to understand. Please try to reduce the
amount of emotion that's going into your argument It's just a
computer thing after all. :)
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> On We
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:10:52PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am working on a non-technical, generic BSD article about special system
> processes. I am trying to figure out some details about swapper (process
> 0) -- and I have a few questions.
[... lots of questions ...]
> Where is this wel
* Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010110 12:11] wrote:
> I am working on a non-technical, generic BSD article about special system
> processes. I am trying to figure out some details about swapper (process
> 0) -- and I have a few questions.
[snip]
>
> Where is this well documented?
"The De
I am working on a non-technical, generic BSD article about special system
processes. I am trying to figure out some details about swapper (process
0) -- and I have a few questions.
I understand that the "swapper process swaps in runnable processes that
are currently swapped out, if there is room.
While it can be done (I do it), using MRTG/rateup/Cricket/etc. without SNMP
is much like pushing a car down the street. Sometimes it's The Right Thing
to do but for the other 99.4% of the time, it's far preferable to use the
engine to power it.
UCD-SNMP is more than just the UCD SNMP daemon. It'
Has anyone looked into using SNMP with MRTG or some of the other utilities
that comes with UCD-SNMP?
I think this would be very easy this way. We use Castle Rock's SNMPc running
on NT to montior our servers and connections.
UCD-SNMP is a daemon and SNMP utilities for Linux and FreeBSD flavors th
On 10/01, Robert Watson wrote:
| Presumably at some point in the stack, that notification is translated
| from a hardware event, which might be associated with devd in some manner
| (and possibly also exposed there).
This is the ideal situation. The other one being that the status can be
read, w
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:57:14AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to be warned about ethernet link up/down events? I have a
> > > laptop with an internal fxp0 interface, and I'd l
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:57:14AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to be warned about ethernet link up/down events? I have a
> > laptop with an internal fxp0 interface, and I'd like to launch/kill
> > dhclient whenever the link goes up
> In summary: I do not see a valid argument for not having the bugfix at
> all, available as an option. I do see the argument for not changing the
> default. I also see that everyone who opposes seems to believe that it
> is only people without major skills that get confused by all this, since
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Is there a way to be warned about ethernet link up/down events? I have a
> laptop with an internal fxp0 interface, and I'd like to launch/kill
> dhclient whenever the link goes up/down.
I've been wondering about this also -- Darwin has this, and it's
On Wed 2001-01-10 (21:35), Greg Black wrote:
> > These changes have been tested in OpenBSD for 3 years.
>
> That's not the same as testing under FreeBSD.
Of course not, but it's a reasonably similar population type.
> And it's not just a matter of testing anyway -- it's a matter of
> changing
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> On Wed 2001-01-10 (21:20), Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > IMHO, the solution is not to schedule jobs during during the changeover
> > period. However, *if* the mods are adopted, it should default to off. Add
> > a switch to turn them on. See how that runs for a few
Graham Wheeler wrote:
>
> David Malone wrote:
> >
> > If you read the paragraph below that code, it notes that the ifreq
> > structures are of variable length. The spacing depends on the size
> > of the returned info.
>
> That's true. In which case the cheops code is wrong, as it iterates
> thro
Is there a way to be warned about ethernet link up/down events? I have a
laptop with an internal fxp0 interface, and I'd like to launch/kill dhclient
whenever the link goes up/down.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the mess
On Wed 2001-01-10 (22:35), Dan Langille wrote:
> That's a relatively smaller user-base compared to FreeBSD. Do you
> consider that sufficient?
I would, yes, considering it has been three years. You may feel free to
disagree, of course, and I'll get to why next:
> I don't see how the above rel
On 10 Jan 2001, at 11:24, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> These changes have been tested in OpenBSD for 3 years.
That's a relatively smaller user-base compared to FreeBSD. Do you
consider that sufficient?
> The "solution"
> is _not_ to tell people they're stupid to schedule jobs during the
> chan
-On [20010103 03:55], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Hi. I have a netgear Ethernet card installed in my computer. In order
>to reconnect my computer to the internet, I have to reinstall the
>drivers and they're missing. So, I opened up my computer to look at the
>Ethernet card and I
On Wed 2001-01-10 (21:20), Dan Langille wrote:
> > > And when you finally realize that everyone else thinks this is a great
> > > idea,
>
> I do not like being included in "everyone". I don't think it's a great idea.
If you didn't miss the comment, I was (and am now) attempting to emulate
Doug
On 9 Jan 2001, at 10:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> > And when you finally realize that everyone else thinks this is a great
> > idea,
I do not like being included in "everyone". I don't think it's a great idea.
>
> In fact, I'm quite sure that this is not true. I happen to be the only one
>
46 matches
Mail list logo
