Barry Lustig wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > I'm always tempted to set up a company where the main
> > engineers have a centralized batch compile server, so as to
> > not slow down developement, but requiring that they run no
> > better than a 386SX/16 on their de
Hi,
does anyone know of a slab allocator implementation for BSD ? Linux
now supports a slab allocator in the kernel for efficient allocation and
deallocation of memory objects.
- Mohit
P.S. more info on slab allocator can be obtained from the USENIX 1994 paper:
http://www.usen
Dear All,
When I said that I was going home to a system that actually works I
really meant it:
Upgrading my home box to FreeBSD 4.2-beta has given me working audio
on my Asus k7v motherboard (using the pcm driver and option PNPBIOS).
The dreaded out of sync errors from the (logitech cordless) PS
Kaltashkin Eugene wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:08:00 +0100
> Stefan Aeschbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SA> Hi
> SA> the problem is, that you have the same subnet (indicated by the netmask)
> SA> on two interfaces. The best solution to the problem is taking two
> SA> different subnet
Hi,
I'm on USENIX's Freenix program committee this year and have been
asked to recruit submissions from FreeBSD developers for refereed
track papers.
I've already sent targeted solicitations to a handful of people,
however I'm certainly overlooking people who are doing exciting,
researchy s
* Jesper Skriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001117 12:11] wrote:
[snip]
>
> This timeout could be avoided if the sending mail server reacted to the
> 'ICMP administratively prohibited' they got from our router.
[snip]
>
> $ telnet nemo.dyndns.dk 25
> Trying 193.89.247.125...
> telnet: Unable to connec
Duh, nevermind, thanks Julian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher
Harrer
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 4:48 PM
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: Freebsd-Hackers
Subject: RE: Remote GDB
Yes, that's what I mean.
I've already gotten the r
Yes, that's what I mean.
I've already gotten the remote kernel debugging started. What I want to do
is at some point after running for a while, from the remote gdb terminal
"break" into the running kernel. In other systems, I was able to do this by
entering a ^c from the gdb terminal. It doesn
Christopher Harrer wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Is there a way to "break" into a gdb (using remote GDB) while a FreeBSD
> system under test is running? I've tried ^C with no success (meaning I
> never stop execution). Also, I've tried "interrupt" from the button menu in
do you mean kernel debu
Hello All,
Is there a way to "break" into a gdb (using remote GDB) while a FreeBSD
system under test is running? I've tried ^C with no success (meaning I
never stop execution). Also, I've tried "interrupt" from the button menu in
DDD.
Thanks!
Chris
Chris Harrer
Alacritech, Inc.
403 West Linc
Hello All,
Is there a way to "break" into a gdb (using remote GDB) while a FreeBSD
system under test is running? I've tried ^C with no success (meaning I
never stop execution). Also, I've tried "interrupt" from the button menu in
DDD.
Thanks!
Chris
Chris Harrer
Alacritech, Inc.
403 West Linc
Hi,
I'm currently looking at how various operating systems react to a 'ICMP
administratively prohibited'.
My motivation is setup's where access to the primary mailserver is
blocked by filters (usually to block open relay's), and all mail has to
go via the backup MX, a example from a customer of
Dear Bill,
I've cvsupped, which gave me the patched version of the pcn driver. Thanks
for the prompt response.
I've build various kernels.
Kernel with pcn and lnc compiled in: trap 12
Kernel with lnc only:trap 12
Kernel with pcn only:works, but no network
Ker
i don't know if i understand exactly what you want but the following
setup could work:
lo0 has ip-address 192.168.0.1 and netmask 255.255.255.128
the computers connected to this interface can have the ip-addresses:
192.168.0.2-192.168.0.126
(broadcast ip for this subnet is 192.168.0.127)
fxp0 h
There used to be some very strange code in the lnc driver that relied
on the ISA probe for the original PCnet-PCI device failing, then probed
it in the if_lnc_pci stub.
Your card shouldn't really be identified as a VL-Bus one when it is a
PCI device, so maybe the lnc probe has been broken by the
>
> *ahem* How about compiling a kernel *without* the pcn driver?
> I want to know why you didn't consider this combination. (Well, I
> know why: because giving me the answer straight away rather than
> making me drag it out of you would have been too easy. I would never
> be that lucky.)
>
I did
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:08:00 +0100
Stefan Aeschbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SA> Hi
SA> the problem is, that you have the same subnet (indicated by the netmask)
SA> on two interfaces. The best solution to the problem is taking two
SA> different subnets, e.g. 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Hi
the problem is, that you have the same subnet (indicated by the netmask)
on two interfaces. The best solution to the problem is taking two
different subnets, e.g. 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 on lo0
and 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 on fxp0. It is also possible
to use the 192.168.0 n
Hello.
i have 2 interface netcard on one computer.
This card have ip numbers from one net , eq 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2
i see in log files message
arp 192.168.0.2 is on lo0 but got reply from xx:xx:xx:xx on fxp0 ?
what is it ?
Best Regards.
Zhecka.
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Julian Elischer on 2000-11-16 (Thu) at 07:35:23 -0800:
>
> frank xu wrote:
> >
> > I heard rumor that Thomas E. Anderson's Scheduler Activations theory will
> > be implemented in FreeBSD 5.0 kernel, is it true?
>
> Basically the coming FreeBSD threading system will be based on the work
> by
> A
20 matches
Mail list logo
