Re: PATCH src/etc/root : more->less

2000-07-12 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 12:30:38AM -0400, Sean Lutner wrote: > (17) sean@pulse: ~ $ ls -G > ls: illegal option -- G > usage: ls [-ACFHLPRTWacdfgiklnoqrstu1] [file ...] > (18) sean@pulse: ~ $ > > > sure about that? output from a 4.0-STABLE system, last cvsup'd july 1.

Re: #include question: requires

2000-07-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Wilbert de Graaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000712 19:11] wrote: > > Maybe obvious to some of you, but I had to define two new structures (as > described in an ietf draft) in . This in order to be able to > support igmpv3 / multicast source filters. Anyway, these structures require > 'struct sockaddr

Re: PATCH src/etc/root : more->less

2000-07-12 Thread Sean Lutner
(17) sean@pulse: ~ $ ls -G ls: illegal option -- G usage: ls [-ACFHLPRTWacdfgiklnoqrstu1] [file ...] (18) sean@pulse: ~ $ sure about that? output from a 4.0-STABLE system, last cvsup'd july 1. On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > What about it for 4.

ldap library name conflict problem

2000-07-12 Thread Charles N. Owens
I 've encountered a problem which I could see affecting other LDAP hackers as well: the libldap and libber libraries from openldap and from the Mozilla ldap-sdk (${PORTSDIR}/net/ldapsdk) get installed with the same names and version numbers (but not in the same directories... the mozilla libs get

Why isn't localhost used by talk?

2000-07-12 Thread Joseph Jacobson
Local to local talk doesn't work if the hostname for the box doesn't match any an ip on any interface. Although this sounds wierd, consider a non-dedicated ppp link. Although you can get around this problem with 'talk user@localhost', POLA would say talk should default to localhost. I couldn'

#include question: requires

2000-07-12 Thread Wilbert de Graaf
Maybe obvious to some of you, but I had to define two new structures (as described in an ietf draft) in . This in order to be able to support igmpv3 / multicast source filters. Anyway, these structures require 'struct sockaddr_storage' which is defined in . When I compiled the code, it stopped si

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kevin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000712 14:14] wrote: > > It's in recent versions of stable and current. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/sys/kqueue.2 > > Ah, thank you! > > How does kqueue interact with uthreads? I noticed that aio_waitcomplete() > blocks the entire

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kevin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000712 13:25] wrote: > > Have a look at "man kqueue", it's a really nifty interface that works > > very well. > > I've seen other references to kqueue on this list, but have yet to find it. > Where can I find the man page in cvs? Is this on -CURRENT or -STABLE?

Re: System Crash

2000-07-12 Thread Simon
I say it's a bad memory. I had the same problem. -Simon On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:45:56 -0400 (EDT), Essenz Consulting wrote: >Question. > >I have a machine that is crashing. Basically, random processes will die >off and give SEGMENTATION FAULTS, then followed by a core dump, and the >machine halt

Re: Module parameters?

2000-07-12 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mike Smith writes: > Archie - I'd really appreciate a pointer to an example of using the > ng_parse code to pick up this sort of data, if you can recommend > something to help me get my head around it quickly (I've looked but slid > off sideways so far...). Just to clarify.. a couple of things

Re: System Crash

2000-07-12 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:45:56PM -0400, Essenz Consulting wrote: > Question. > > I have a machine that is crashing. Basically, random processes will die > off and give SEGMENTATION FAULTS, then followed by a core dump, and the > machine halts. Has to be manual rebooted after that. I tryed anoth

System Crash

2000-07-12 Thread Essenz Consulting
Question. I have a machine that is crashing. Basically, random processes will die off and give SEGMENTATION FAULTS, then followed by a core dump, and the machine halts. Has to be manual rebooted after that. I tryed another hard drive in the machine, and same problems come up. So I am not sure if

Re: g++ 2.95 and -fsjlj-exceptions problems

2000-07-12 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Max Khon wrote: > our g++ uses -fsjlj-exceptions by default for exceptions handling. > this mode has problems (see #258 in gcc GNATS). > this bug can be 100% reproduced when try-catch block is not in > constructor and with optimization turned off (Reactor_Exceptio

Re: UUU: Bug in StarOffice5 Port

2000-07-12 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi! > > It is known good RAM. I got it to work without the port, so just untarring > > the package, and then running setup :-) > > Please try SO 5.2 and see if works for you... I have tried for several days to > install the new one and the setup.bin dies with a sig6 after being unable to > regist

Re: UUU: Bug in StarOffice5 Port

2000-07-12 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 03:09:49AM -0400, Sean Lutner wrote: > I install Star Office 5.2 on my 4.0-STABLE box tonight. I didn't use > ports. I ahve linux emulation enabled. I got the bin file, ran it and it > installed. > > The only quirk I hit was the location Star Office looks for test in. > It

g++ 2.95 and -fsjlj-exceptions problems

2000-07-12 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! our g++ uses -fsjlj-exceptions by default for exceptions handling. this mode has problems (see #258 in gcc GNATS). this bug can be 100% reproduced when try-catch block is not in constructor and with optimization turned off (Reactor_Exceptions_Test from ACE 5.1.1). the problem is that

Re: POSIX Real time extensions

2000-07-12 Thread Peter Dufault
> > > > Is there any present plans to implement the posix realtime signal queues in the > > freeBSD kernel? ... > > Have a look at "man kqueue", it's a really nifty interface that works > very well. I will and will look at adding the signal semantics. If anyone sees where the RTMX source code,

Re: PATCH src/etc/root : more->less

2000-07-12 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What about it for 4.0-ST? > > alias hhistory 25 > alias jjobs -l > -alias la ls -a > -alias lf ls -FA > -alias ll ls -lA > +alias la ls -aG > +alias lf ls -FAG > +alias ll ls -lAG No. If you want

Re: UUU: Bug in StarOffice5 Port

2000-07-12 Thread Sean Lutner
I install Star Office 5.2 on my 4.0-STABLE box tonight. I didn't use ports. I ahve linux emulation enabled. I got the bin file, ran it and it installed. The only quirk I hit was the location Star Office looks for test in. It wanted it in /usr/bin/test and it's in /bin/test. A simple ln -s later,

Re: PATCH src/etc/root : more->less

2000-07-12 Thread Adam
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Brooks Davis wrote: >On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 03:13:06PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: >> >> How about we don't :-). Let's just use whatever "more" is as the pager, >> the way it has always been. In new releases, more is less (or less is >> more, or something), so there shoul