Re: Acceptable MBUF levels?

2000-01-28 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Doug White wrote: > > >When people refer to mbufs, they refer to mbuf clusters, of which there's > >a fixed number. The kernel will allocate more mbufs as necessary. > > Uhm, actually, mbufs are also allocated from mb_ma

using pipes

2000-01-28 Thread Dave Walton
I'm working on a project where one process will be working with a stream of data from a series of separate processes. We currently have an architecture where process A (the controller) starts up process B (the source). The output from B is directed into a named pipe (created earlier with mkf

Re: 3.4 cdroms and xdm

2000-01-28 Thread Kurt Olsen
>And, for any user who cannot login via XDM, login over the network and >read the .xsession-errors file created in their home directory. Additionally, if you don't have a network you can hit Ctrl-F1 to get back to a text terminal. Or just enter the username, hit Enter, enter the passwordd and hit

Re: 3.4 cdroms and xdm

2000-01-28 Thread Wes Peters
Kurt Olsen wrote: > > Re: XDM problem. > > Make sure that each users' .xsession file is set as executable for the > owner. And, for any user who cannot login via XDM, login over the network and read the .xsession-errors file created in their home directory. -- "Where am I, and wha

Re: downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Tony Finch
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Once you tell an application to bind to a particular IP address >I'm pretty sure most don't have an option to bind another listen >socket. > >The customer can't fail over properly because even when the alias >for the box that dies comes up, thier daem

Re: Compiling under the linux emulator

2000-01-28 Thread Gene Harris
All you need to do is modify your path to include whatever linux subdirs you need referenced first, such as PATH=/usr/compat/linux/bin:$PATH;export PATH. You may need to add other subdirs as well, according to any errors you might receive. That is all it takes. And, it works! *===

Re: how to allocate an alined address for a device?

2000-01-28 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Rabson writes: : I'm uneasy about using the flags for this since I'm vaguely reserving the : upper 16 bits of flags for bus-specific purposes (although I haven't : formalised this). : : For allocating aligned regions with pnp, I simply looped in the caller : t

Re: downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jack Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000128 15:04] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > You have multiple customers on two boxes, each customer gets 2 > > IP address and you lolad balance between the two. > > Ah! I see your difficulty. I was thinking about availability; you > were thinking a

Re: 3.4 cdroms and xdm

2000-01-28 Thread Kurt Olsen
Re: XDM problem. Make sure that each users' .xsession file is set as executable for the owner. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

3.4 cdroms and xdm

2000-01-28 Thread James C. Beyer
A few questions: Am I insane or is my FreeBSD 3.4 install disk from Walnut Creek bad? I can not get it to boot and boot disks created with it do not work. Will boot disks created from the web source work? I seem to vaguely remember something about this but can not remember where or what was sa

Re: downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Jack Rusher
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > You have multiple customers on two boxes, each customer gets 2 > IP address and you lolad balance between the two. Ah! I see your difficulty. I was thinking about availability; you were thinking about load balancing. > Some customers may wish to run thier own sql s

Re: Compiling under the linux emulator

2000-01-28 Thread Charles Anderson
I was looking for this same info a while back, didn't find it in my search of the archives, please let me know if you have any success. thanks, -Charlie (compiled but not linked) On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 05:24:46PM -0600, Gene Harris wrote: > I need to compile a program under the freebsd linux >

Re: SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Corey Leopold wrote: > If I couldn't just boot into a single processor kernel and it worked, I would > suspect that it is a bad cable. You might want to take the output of 'mptable' to -smp and ask there. Something isn't being setup correctly with regard to the PCI-PCI bridg

Re: SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Corey Leopold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 28-Jan-00 Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Corey Leopold wrote: > ... > > What is the board connected to? Hub? Switch? Can you specify media > settings manually? > I've had it on a cross-over cable with a 100MB sparc on the other end, and

Re: SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Corey Leopold wrote: ... > FreeBSD abs 3.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #2: Thu Jan 27 15:22:25 CST 2000 > root@abs:/usr/src/sys/compile/ABS i386 > > And finally the error > > fxp0: device timeout > > With no response from the network. What is the board connected to?

Re: SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Corey Leopold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 28-Jan-00 Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > ... > > FreeBSD sasami.jurai.net 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #3: Tue Jan 4 > 16:43:36 EST 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SASAMI > i386 > > Sounds like your system isn't setting up the PCI-PCI bridge co

Re: downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jack Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000128 07:42] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > Does anyone particularly like/hate this idea? Just wanted to > > share, and possibly get better suggestions. > > I usually do that like this: > > HostA -> Address1, Alias1 > HostB -> Address2 > > ...wher

Re: java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55

2000-01-28 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes this fixed it. Thanks. Thanks for testing it. I have merged the fix into -stable now. John -- John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.

Re: java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55

2000-01-28 Thread Chad David
Yes this fixed it. Thanks. Chad On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Since the ~Jan 25 I have been getting an error while > > running any java programs on 3.4-stable. I cvsup'd,and > > ran a make world

Re: SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Corey Leopold wrote: > I was wondering if anybody has had problems with the dual port Intel > PRO/100+ cards with a multi-processor kernel. We are getting device > timeouts when booted into a SMP kernel. Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboar

Re: java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55

2000-01-28 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the ~Jan 25 I have been getting an error while > running any java programs on 3.4-stable. I cvsup'd,and > ran a make world this afternoon and it still fails. It doesn't > always hit... about 50% of the time. > > T

SMP + Dual port Intel PRO/100+

2000-01-28 Thread Corey Leopold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I was wondering if anybody has had problems with the dual port Intel PRO/100+ cards with a multi-processor kernel. We are getting device timeouts when booted into a SMP kernel. Things we have tried The card works fine with a single processor kernel... Reb

java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55

2000-01-28 Thread Chad David
Since the ~Jan 25 I have been getting an error while running any java programs on 3.4-stable. I cvsup'd,and ran a make world this afternoon and it still fails. It doesn't always hit... about 50% of the time. The errors is: ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 o

Re: downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Jack Rusher
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Does anyone particularly like/hate this idea? Just wanted to > share, and possibly get better suggestions. I usually do that like this: HostA -> Address1, Alias1 HostB -> Address2 ...where Host A and Host B talk to each other through the pair of "real" addresses, w

downed IP addresses/redundancy

2000-01-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
This is an idea I had to help people provide for reduntant servers. Many programs will bind to all interfaces to serve requests, however sometimes it's important that a service only appear on a single IP or interface. However you'd really like the server to be able to bind to 2 IP addresses, one

Re: how to allocate an alined address for a device?

2000-01-28 Thread Doug Rabson
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, YAMAMOTO Shigeru wrote: > > > "Warner" == Warner Losh writes: > Warner> In a cardbus system, one would force the alignment in the card bus > Warner> bridge. It would reject those things that aren't aligned in a sane > Warner> manner for cardbus. It would try again to

Re: how to catch a wildrunning pointer

2000-01-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Thomas Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000128 02:42] wrote: > > > Hi > > My Problem: > Within a kernel timeout routine I allocate memory and fill it with data. > After a while I lock at this data again and realize that it it was modifyted > (but not by me). > How can I set a kernel mode watch poin

how to catch a wildrunning pointer

2000-01-28 Thread Thomas Klein
Hi My Problem: Within a kernel timeout routine I allocate memory and fill it with data. After a while I lock at this data again and realize that it it was modifyted (but not by me). How can I set a kernel mode watch point to that data to see which function change the data. Any Ideas Rega