In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd"
writes:
: Well, you can do it the trial and error way like I did or you can ask
: questions; I feel I've got a pretty good handle on things or at least
: enough to field questions.
Also some drivers are better to look at than others. ed, ep, and
unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 1)Are BSD drivers not really documented?(I fear that I may not end up
> re-inventing the wheel)
I assume that by "drivers" you mean "device drivers" in this context,
e.g. our code for supporting various network interface cards, SCSI
controllers, etc.
They are documented in the sense that ther
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Tony Frank (EPA) wrote:
> Since the card supports having the MMIO and the SRAM in seperate areas,
> essentially the driver should support this also.
>
> I'm not sure whether the card will let me arrange the memory locations so
> that it's all continuous.
Ah, in that case you
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:59:53 +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Harlan is the *maintainer* of the ntp source tree at udel and
> generates all releases :-)
Okay, people, relax. So far, the only person I haven't been chewed
out by for this is Mr. Stenn himself, who seemed to feel that he'd
mispo
Hi,
>> I think I could configure the card to use the range 0xd -
0xd3fff
>> for the SRAM and then 0xd4000 - 0xd5fff for the MMIO, thus having
a
>> continuous block between 0xd and 0xd5fff that I might be able
to
>> allocate in one hit. This however seems t
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Tony Frank (EPA) wrote:
> I think I could configure the card to use the range 0xd - 0xd3fff
> for the SRAM and then 0xd4000 - 0xd5fff for the MMIO, thus having a
> continuous block between 0xd and 0xd5fff that I might be able to
> allocate in one hit. This however see
Dear Sir,
I am a M.S. student with major as Computer Science. I am doing an
independent study with my professor. I have been told that BSD drivers are
not documented at this point of time. So I would like to document the BSD
Drivers.
It would be a big help for me if you could answer the follo
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> * Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000120 15:30] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is a while in coming, but now that I'm looking at getting
> > ppp(8) to talk IPv6 (with the help of some KAME patches), I've looked
> > at how TUNSLMODE is implemented... it doesn't look good to me.
> >
> >
My question is, should setuid() fail if the target user's maximum number
of processes (RLIMIT_NPROC) would be exceeded?
Background: in an attempt to manage our webserver to keep too many CGIs
from taking down the machine, I've been experimenting with RLIMIT_NPROC.
This appears to work fine when f
* Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000120 15:30] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is a while in coming, but now that I'm looking at getting
> ppp(8) to talk IPv6 (with the help of some KAME patches), I've looked
> at how TUNSLMODE is implemented... it doesn't look good to me.
>
> What's the ratio
Hi,
I know this is a while in coming, but now that I'm looking at getting
ppp(8) to talk IPv6 (with the help of some KAME patches), I've looked
at how TUNSLMODE is implemented... it doesn't look good to me.
What's the rationale behind stuffing the entire sockaddr in front of
the packet ? AFA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
de>, Jan Conrad writes:
>When I cloned a new machine, I usually booted with the floppies, set up
>DOS partitions and disk label and then pulled everyting over by tar and
>rsh, thereby overwriting fstab etc. with prepared files. Worked pretty
>fast...
>
>What would yo
Hi,
In my spare time I have been working on a driver for IBM Shared RAM style
token-ring adapters.
So far I am progressing well enough (using Larry Lile's earlier version and
also the NetBSD driver for reference) however I am running into one
particular problem.
The card itself has a block of m
It is almost done. A working and very lightly tested version of the code will
be made available on Monday (Jan 24). It should be considered alpha quality,
I would not recommend running important NFS servers with this code.
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I would *strongly* suggest to put rsh/rlogin + tar onto the root
> > filesystem. I allways found these commands to be *extremely* useful in
> > single user mode with all other partitions unmounted (e.g. when
> > reorganizing the structu
As I mentioned earlier, I'm thinking about trying to implement a UDF
filesystem. I've been thinking how to start and have come up with the
following, and would appreciate any comments.
Waht I was thinking about doing, was first writting, (probably using the
nullfs code a a base) a userfs, that w
> I would *strongly* suggest to put rsh/rlogin + tar onto the root
> filesystem. I allways found these commands to be *extremely* useful in
> single user mode with all other partitions unmounted (e.g. when
> reorganizing the structure of my partitions/disks etc.)
>
> How about it?
I doubt it. :-
Trying to use AMD mounted filesystems on FreeBSD 3.2 served
on a Solaris 2.6 system fails. Navigating to a directory
and doing a "ls" hangs. In my case, other NFS/AMD operations
still succeed. This was all working before the server was
upgraded from Solaris 2.5 to 2.6. Ideas or assistance
glad
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Jan Conrad wrote:
> I now resolved the problem by mounting the root dir of the other machine
> by nfs and copying directly from that. Doing this I found - to my great
> surprise - that FreeBSD's root filesystem neither contains rsh/rlogin nor
> tar!!
>
dms@rally3 ~ 239$ whi
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Why was it removed?
> > If there are no good reasons, please could somebody put back rsh onto the
> > floppy! Currently I don't see how to do cloning easily without rsh?
>
> The fixit floppy is very full and its days as a truly useful tool are
>
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, D. Rock wrote:
> > If there are no good reasons, please could somebody put back rsh onto the
> > floppy! Currently I don't see how to do cloning easily without rsh?
> Same here.
>
> Had some trouble to dump/restore the system from a life 2nd system.
>
> Finally found a
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> Point 2 seems to be saying that we would rather sacrifice some performance
> to gain a cleaner interface (people are talking about eliminating kernel
> copying for a long time). Consider the physical I/O on a raw device, where
> we ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arun Sharma) writes:
> 2. For cases where you've entered the kernel synchronously - through syscalls
>for example, you need to check for the validity of data. You could
>potentially skip the step and validate the data where it is used, rather
>than doing it upfron
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Arun Sharma wrote:
> In muc.lists.freebsd.hackers, you wrote:
> >
> > When the kernel wants to access any user data, it either copies them into
> > the kernel or maps them into kernel address space. Can anyone tell me the
> > reasons why this is done? When a process enter
hi, there!
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> seems that i tracked down the problem: ld uses cplus-dem.c from
> libiberty (contrib/binutils/libiberty/cplus-dem.c) which differs
> from that one gcc is compiled with (contrib/gcc/cplus-dem.c).
> When I compiled collect2 with libiberty's cplus-d
hi, there!
seems that i tracked down the problem: ld uses cplus-dem.c from
libiberty (contrib/binutils/libiberty/cplus-dem.c) which differs
from that one gcc is compiled with (contrib/gcc/cplus-dem.c).
When I compiled collect2 with libiberty's cplus-dem.c
everything went ok.
/fjoe
To Unsubscr
On 20-Jan-00 Nils M Holm wrote:
> Is there any way to force the creation of dynamically linked executables
> using the ELF linker (like 'ld -Bforcedynamic' in the a.out version)?
>
> I have to link against static libs, but I want to use dlopen() etc.
I think you have to link against the lib
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ray Hyatt Jr." writes:
>Are you interested in external floppy drives with that type
>of bus?
Not really. The intent of the driver is to interface to ascii
based test/lab equipment, not to apply for membership in the
antique hardware society :-)
--
Poul-Henning
hi, there!
This small program does not build with both -current gcc
(gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release), I built collect2 for it
manually) and gcc-devel (gcc version 2.96 2110 (experimental))
--- cut here ---
CXX=g++ -frepo
LD=g++
foo: foo.o
$(LD) -o $* $>
clean:
rm -f f
Hello!
Is there any way to force the creation of dynamically linked executables
using the ELF linker (like 'ld -Bforcedynamic' in the a.out version)?
I have to link against static libs, but I want to use dlopen() etc.
Thank you for your help!
Bye,
nmh.
--
Nils M Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTE
32 matches
Mail list logo
