Wilko Bulte wrote...
> On a freshly supped -current I get:
>
> location type 0 in non-PLT relocations
> ./make_keys
> /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/keys.list >
> init_keytry.h
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc.so.3:
> Unsupported relocatio
It seems Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Soren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > It seems Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > Anyhow, I have some changes to the worm stuff, it needs to be dealt with
> > > > to handle modern HW, and to deal with all the possible block formats
> > > > thats possible on a CD nowadays. It will p
>
> Kevin Day wrote:
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> man madvise?
>
Yeah, but MADV_FREE doesn't really do what I need. I have no idea if the
system actually did free my ram or not. I want to hang on to the data, but
if more ram is needed, then it can be discarded, but I need to know that it
did, so tha
On a freshly supped -current I get:
location type 0 in non-PLT relocations
./make_keys
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/keys.list >
init_keytry.h
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc.so.3:
Unsupported relocation type 0 in non-PLT relocations
*** E
Kevin Day wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
man madvise?
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Thus, over the years my wife and I have physically diverged. While
I have zoomed toward a crusty middle-age, she has instead clung
doggedly to the sweet b
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> > How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
> > the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
> > resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
> the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
> resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
> by one in the child.
Well, that's one
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> Has anyone had any problems running FreeBSD-SMP on Intel GX-chipset
> motherboards?
We're having trouble with the Intel L440GX+ boards not rebooting, but
FreeBSD runs peachy on them. Haven't stress-tested SMP mode but it does
boot and operate. Our b
Perhaps this is already possible somehow, but...
In working with a graphical based embedded system (non-xwin), I'll typically
mmap the graphic files and bcopy them straight to our hardware blitter. This
works very nicely, since the kernel caches what it can off the disk, but
when more ram is nee
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > freed up by sleeping a process?
>
> four things i can think of:
>
> 1) Along with 'SIGDANGER' it allows the system to fix itself.
> 2) Allow the operator to determine which
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing TCP development on a custom operating system that I've
> written and am using my FreeBSD box for testing my TCP stack. I'm in
> the early stages right now and I have a lot of bugs. One of my bugs
> is that I shut down a connection on my end but I'm doing something
> wrong an
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 00:36:13 1999
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8151 invoked from network); 23 Sep 1999 00:36:12 -
Received: from user2.teleport.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by smtp8.teleport.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 1999 00:36:12 -0
>
> Hi,
>
> I have got a surprising problem with StarOffice 5.1
> for Linux on FreeBSD 4.0-current, the latest snapshot.
> The CD-ROM installation went fine (after I configured the
> Posix real-time thread support and linked the
> additional libraries to the Linux compatibility
> directory and
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> How can I tell how big fifo buffers are?
limits.h I would guess...?
#define_POSIX_PIPE_BUF 512
Andrew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 15:07:13 +0200, Graham Wheeler wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have an interesting problem. I have two processes that need to
> communicate via a domain socket.
All sockets have domains. I assume you are talking about UNIX domain
sockets, as opposed to Internet domain so
How can I tell how big fifo buffers are?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi,
I have got a surprising problem with StarOffice 5.1
for Linux on FreeBSD 4.0-current, the latest snapshot.
The CD-ROM installation went fine (after I configured the
Posix real-time thread support and linked the
additional libraries to the Linux compatibility
directory and slightly corrected
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > Anyhow, I have some changes to the worm stuff, it needs to be dealt with
> > > to handle modern HW, and to deal with all the possible block formats
> > > thats possible on a CD nowadays. It will probably mean the death of
> > > the worm s
Kazutaka YOKOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past, it has been pointed out that some of the termcap entries
> needs updating.
Indeed. I just noticed that screen still has trouble in xterm, due
to a broken termcap entry. Would a committer please take care of
PR #12209?
--
Christian "nadd
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > Chuck Robey wrote:
> > >
> > > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > > freed up by sleeping a process?
> >
> > Any of them being consumed by short-lived processes that wi
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > freed up by sleeping a process?
>
> Any of them being consumed by short-lived processes that will run to
> completion and exit while everyone else is sl
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
> as I explained a few days ago,
> MFS explodes because it synthesises a device vnode
>
> The synthesized vnode is someohow confused as to whether it's a devfs
> vnode or a UFS vnode.
> I can't remember the exact problem but it may have something to do
Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > > Maybe, and then again, maybe not. A program is requesting memory, so
> > > putting other processes to sleep *keeps* them from freeing up memory.
> >
> > The process that is trying to use memory is put to sleep.
>
> Then this 'rogue' process is never allowed to free
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
> the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
> resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
> by one in the child.
As far as I'm con
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> I've just commited a change to the ata driver & wormcontrol, so now
> you should be able to use the keywords: single double quad max
> in the speed selection field. Its not very well tested yet though..
> Try it and watch with systat how high the transf
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> freed up by sleeping a process?
Any of them being consumed by short-lived processes that will run to
completion and exit while everyone else is sleeping. This assumes such
processes exist, of course.
> > > Not only that but perhaps reserving an amount of backing store for
> > > root may be a good idea, artificially limit the resources to several
> > > pages to enable root to actually do something in such a situation.
> >
> > Stick to the topic at hand. That's another topic again, and the top
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
> > Not only that but perhaps reserving an amount of backing store for
> > root may be a good idea, artificially limit the resources to several
> > pages to enable root to actually do something in such a situation.
>
> Stick to the topic at hand. That'
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> (Matt)
> :> How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
> :> the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
> :> resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
>
:> (Matt)
:> How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
:> the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
:> resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
:> by one in the child.
:>
:> The default wo
> > Maybe, and then again, maybe not. A program is requesting memory, so
> > putting other processes to sleep *keeps* them from freeing up memory.
>
> The process that is trying to use memory is put to sleep.
Then this 'rogue' process is never allowed to free up any of it's
resources, hence the
> > > > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > > > freed up by sleeping a process?
> > >
> > > four things i can think of:
> > >
> > > 1) Along with 'SIGDANGER' it allows the system to fix itself.
> >
> > That's another issue. Don't mix sleeping processes wit
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
> Maybe, and then again, maybe not. A program is requesting memory, so
> putting other processes to sleep *keeps* them from freeing up memory.
The process that is trying to use memory is put to sleep. In the
machine runs out of swap cases I have seen (
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
> the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
> resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
> by one in the chi
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > > freed up by sleeping a process?
> >
> > four things i can think of:
> >
> > 1) Along with 'SIGDANGER' it allows the system to fix itself.
>
> That's another issue. Don'
How about this - add an 'importance' resource. The lower the number,
the more likely the process will be killed if the system runs out of
resources. We would also make fork automatically decrement the number
by one in the child.
The default would be 1000. The sysadmin c
> > What kind of resources are there that both cause loss of swap AND are
> > freed up by sleeping a process?
>
> four things i can think of:
>
> 1) Along with 'SIGDANGER' it allows the system to fix itself.
That's another issue. Don't mix sleeping processes with SIGDANGER, they
are independan
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Terry Lambert brought up an interesting thought from AIX (I think),
> > instead of killing a process, it just sleeps the requesting process
> > until the situation alleviates itself. Of course this can
Ivan wrote:
>
> Of course I didn't mean that malloc() calls the pageout daemon ... I
> simply meant that if no more memory space can be regained (in particular
> by killing a process) then at some point memory allocations will be
> refused -- or else, when does malloc() ever returns NULL ?!
When
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Terry Lambert brought up an interesting thought from AIX (I think),
> instead of killing a process, it just sleeps the requesting process
> until the situation alleviates itself. Of course this can wind up
> wedging an entire system, it would probab
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > I had a look at vm_pageout.c and noticed that situations may occur where
> > no process can be killed. I guess that in such situations memory
> > allocation requests are simply rejected ( e.g. malloc returning NULL ) .
>
> Err... no. Malloc() doe
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> First, let me warn you that this is a often recurring thread. It has
> already showed up two or three times this year alone.
>
> Ivan wrote:
> >
> > I had a look at vm_pageout.c and noticed that situations may occur where
> > no process can be kil
First, let me warn you that this is a often recurring thread. It has
already showed up two or three times this year alone.
Ivan wrote:
>
> I had a look at vm_pageout.c and noticed that situations may occur where
> no process can be killed. I guess that in such situations memory
> allocation requ
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
> : Interrupt, DMA, I/O settings, promiscuous operation, baud rate and parity,
> : etc. Any little thing a device driver might desire...
>
> I had been specifically thinking of things more obscure like the
> WNETID for wav
> :where SIZE was 4 MB in this case. I ran it on the console (I've got 64 MB
> :of RAM and 128 MB of swap) until the swap pager went out of space and
> :my huge process was eventually killed as expected. Fine. But when I ran
> :it under X Window, the system eventually killed the X server (SIZE ~
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 04:19:28PM +0200, eT wrote:
> Greets .. are there existing daemons/proxies which convert UDP packets into TCP
>packets to
> act as some kind of relay?
>
> client <-udp-> relay <-tcp-> server
>
> kind regards
ports/net/netcat is your friend.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
Greets .. are there existing daemons/proxies which convert UDP packets into TCP
packets to
act as some kind of relay?
client <-udp-> relay <-tcp-> server
kind regards
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Graham Wheeler wrote:
> The server creates a domain socket to listen for requests with the
> path /cage/tmp/server. The client runs chrooted in the /cage directory,
> and creates a domain socket /tmp/client.. It sends a request to
> the server with a sendto() specifying the socket address /tmp/se
Graham Wheeler wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I have an interesting problem. I have two processes that need to
> communicate via a domain socket. One of the processes (the client)
> runs in a chrooted environment.
>
> The server creates a domain socket to listen for requests with the
> path /cage/tmp/se
Hi all
I have an interesting problem. I have two processes that need to
communicate via a domain socket. One of the processes (the client)
runs in a chrooted environment.
The server creates a domain socket to listen for requests with the
path /cage/tmp/server. The client runs chrooted in the /c
Hello,
Could some one point me to or send to me a driver that use KLD.
What should I do
to make driver module? Should I manually run attach and probe in module?
Thanks.
Kurakin Roman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of t
It seems Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> > > I'm using one atapi-cdrw (CREATIVE CD-RW RW4224E/1.36) and works fine but
> > > I don't know change speed to 4x, now I'm burning at double speed (I'm
> > > spending 37min to burn one full cd). I've got other unit (YAMAHA-SCSI)
> > > which spends 17min for a full
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using one atapi-cdrw (CREATIVE CD-RW RW4224E/1.36) and works fine but
> > I don't know change speed to 4x, now I'm burning at double speed (I'm
> > spending 37min to burn one full cd). I've got other un
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:06:41 EST, "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" wrote:
> Gawk has more features, but I saw a test somewhere that showed a
> bug in the FreeBSD version. I can dig it up if someone is really
> interested.
PR 13615
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
54 matches
Mail list logo
