[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #7 from Dimitry Andric --- Hm I've put DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=11 in my make.conf, but it seems at least the mesa-dri ports still hardcode llvm10. :) So that's a little annyoing, but I guess it can't be helped? -- You are recei

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 Evgeniy Khramtsov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evge...@khramtsov.org --- Comm

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #9 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Evgeniy Khramtsov from comment #8) I'm unsure if mesa can "just" compile with different LLVM versions than what it was released for, as it may be that they depend on specific APIs. The LL

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #10 from Evgeniy Khramtsov --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #9) I don't feel like hijacking the topic of this bug for discussion of x11@ policy, but I think I should clarify: > if mesa can compile Upstream accepts

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #11 from Evgeniy Khramtsov --- (In reply to Evgeniy Khramtsov from comment #10) Note: Arch also built against 11 when mesa was at 20. This one is important. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #12 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #9) > I think it would be handy if in general the LLVM versions for firefox and > rust are kept the same? Without enabling LTO by default it'd double (or triple a

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #13 from Jan Beich --- Kinda forgot, LLVM_DEFAULT desync can be caused by either gecko@ bumping too early and rust@ forgetting to bump. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #14 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=b1c90afe23f93698805a22802f2dd02acbe4488a commit b1c90afe23f93698805a22802f2dd02acbe4488a Author:

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #15 from Jan Beich --- Can someone check LTO build after applying review D30099? Don't forget to remove DEFAULT_VERSION+=llvm=11 workaround. $ rustc -vV rustc 1.52.0 binary: rustc commit-hash: unknown commit-date: unknown host:

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-05-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #16 from jakub_l...@mailplus.pl --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #13) Yes, I've tried building now without llvm11 hack with LTO, wasn't successful. LLVM ERROR: Broken module found, compilation aborted! PLEASE submit a bu