https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359
--- Comment #10 from Evgeniy Khramtsov <evge...@khramtsov.org> --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #9) I don't feel like hijacking the topic of this bug for discussion of x11@ policy, but I think I should clarify: > if mesa can compile Upstream accepts LLVM versions >= 8.0.0 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/blob/mesa-20.2.3/meson.build#L1449-1455 For example, Arch Linux already builds against LLVM 11 (see llvm-libs version): https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/mesa/ The current LLVM 10 for mesa-libs is outdated. > Note that it says "=" not "?=" which must be for a reason. :) x11@ favors apparent stability and the use of binary packages. They also think that putting artificial limitations like non-overridable LLVM version for people who build from source is a good idea, maybe because handling possible reports is too hard. Not to mention the time and carbon footprint of the hardcoded LLVM version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
