Re: CFT: Fix VirtualBox on 9-CURRENT and recent STABLE

2010-03-09 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/09/10 08:45, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > - get the tarball from > http://svn.bluelife.at/nightlies/virtualbox-port-r755.tar.gz I'm building this now, will report if it works or not (it was previously broken for me). However I noticed that the -ose-devel port doesn't work with guestadditions

Re: CFT: Fix VirtualBox on 9-CURRENT and recent STABLE

2010-03-15 Thread Doug Barton
FYI just tried the new 3.14 port with today's -current and it worked just fine! Thanks to the vbox team for all the hard work. :) Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet

Re: Aw: Shared Folders in FreeBSD guest on WinXP host

2010-04-25 Thread Doug Barton
The easiest way that I've found to share files between a freebsd host and win guest is to set up samba on the host, and let the guest connect to the share. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve th

Re: VirtualBox 3.2.0 port

2010-05-23 Thread Doug Barton
In addition to Kevin's suggestions, try: cd /var/db mv ports ports-old And then try 'make config' again. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a

flash problem: unhandled variable 18 in NPP_GetValue()

2010-07-17 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, I'm working on diagnosing my problems with flash in -current, and ran firefox on the command line to see if anything interesting popped out, and saw this, repeatedly: *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 (variable>) in NPN_GetValue() *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING:

Re: flash problem: unhandled variable 18 in NPP_GetValue()

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Doug Barton wrote: Howdy, I'm working on diagnosing my problems with flash in -current, and ran firefox on the command line to see if anything interesting popped out, and saw this, repeatedly: *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 () in NPN_Get

Fonts in linux-thunderbird

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, I got tired of waiting for thunderbird 3.1 so I decided to give the linux version a try. Everything works fine, except for fonts. When attempting to change the fonts I can see the names of the fonts listed but changing it has no effect. I can change the size, but it's still the standard nas

Re: Hope for USB support?

2010-10-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/13/2010 9:13 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: I was thinking about something like $500-$1000 for adding USB support to VirtualBox through LibUSB. Probably you are right that it would be better to go through the FreeBSD Foundation, but I would also be fine getting paid directly through paypal

Re: The size of the distfile of linux-f10-flashplugin has changed.

2010-11-06 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/6/2010 1:19 PM, crocket wrote: The size of it changed, and port refuses to build it. Can you solve this issue? Try updating your ports tree. I just updated and was able to install the new version without any problems. hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' ch

vbox error trying to create a raw disk file

2010-11-10 Thread Doug Barton
I was following the instructions here: http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.html#rawdisk And I got the following error: VBoxManage internalcommands createrawvmdk -filename WindowsXP.vmdk -rawdisk /dev/ad0 -partitions 1,5 Oracle VM VirtualBox Command Line Management Interface Version 3.2.10_O

Re: vbox error trying to create a raw disk file

2010-11-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/10/2010 21:56, Edho P Arief wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Doug Barton wrote: I was following the instructions here: http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.html#rawdisk And I got the following error: VBoxManage internalcommands createrawvmdk -filename WindowsXP.vmdk -rawdisk

Re: rc.d script for running multiple VirtualBox VMs from /etc/rc.conf

2011-04-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 4/12/2011 12:15 PM, Tobias Oberstein wrote: I wanted to configure multiple VirtualBox VMs to startup automatically at boot time and generally be a nice citizen to the FreeBSD way of starting up stuff. Thanks for providing this, however there are several problems, some of which you outlined

Re: AW: rc.d script for running multiple VirtualBox VMs from /etc/rc.conf

2011-04-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 4/12/2011 12:35 PM, Tobias Oberstein wrote: I wanted to configure multiple VirtualBox VMs to startup automatically at boot time and generally be a nice citizen to the FreeBSD way of starting up stuff. Thanks for providing this, however there are several problems, some of which you outlined i

Re: AW: rc.d script for running multiple VirtualBox VMs from /etc/rc.conf

2011-04-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 4/12/2011 12:42 PM, Rusty Nejdl wrote: While I was developing a port for ASSP2, I had to have it do a wait while it was shutting that down: stop_cmd=assp2_daemon_stop command=/usr/local/sbin/assp2 command_interpreter=/usr/local/bin/perl pidfile=/var/db/assp2/pid assp2_daemon_stop() { if

Re: RFC: small patch to linux_base files for package building

2011-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/2011 14:28, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> No strong objection from me, however, I would definitely be happier >> to see this code as part of bsd.port.mk as I proposed in >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135221 D

Re: FreeBSD Port: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10

2011-08-01 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/01/2011 02:15, José Miguel Martínez Carrasco wrote: > ===> linux_base-f10-10_4 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded. you should read the error messages. :) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and

Re: [ports-i...@freebsd.org: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r181.34 failed on i386 9]

2011-08-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/11/2011 21:41, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > I'm talking about stability here. Adobe silently shipped another version > and our port become unbuildable because distfile wasn't available anymore. The correct answer to this problem is to update the affected ports. -- Nothin' ever doe

Re: [ports-i...@freebsd.org: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r181.34 failed on i386 9]

2011-08-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/13/2011 01:00, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > It still leaves the port broken from the disappearance of the > previous distfile until the maintainer has time to update the > port. Yup. > That is likely to be a not-insignificant length of time, > because we cannot reasonably expect port mai

FreeBSD port(s) you maintain which are currently vulnerable

2011-09-03 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, According to the latest portaudit database the following ports are currently vulnerable. You maintain one or more of these ports. Please consider one of the following courses of action: 1. Removing the port 2. Fixing the port 3. Allowing it to be returned to the po...@freebsd.org maintaine

Re: VirtualBox: 64bit FreeBSD guest on 64bit FreeBSD host … "Long Mode"?

2011-10-01 Thread Doug Barton
FWIW I have 64-bit guests working fine on my still-9-current (r225756) amd64 host with the latest ports vbox. I'm running it with the gui in X, not sure if that makes a difference. On 10/01/2011 10:58, Hub- FreeBSD wrote: > PAE: on I have PAE off for all hosts, but I just tried turni

Re: "CPU doesn't support long mode" error message

2011-10-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/07/2011 16:51, Hub- FreeBSD wrote: > So … is there something specific at that URL (beyond the I/O APIC that David > did try) that he and I (and potentially others) have both missed for > this?___ The 2 settings that seem to be relevant to 64-bit

Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/graphics Makefile ports/graphics/linux-tiff Makefile distinfo.i386 pkg-descr pkg-plist.i386

2011-10-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/16/2011 10:28, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 15.10.2011 04:45, Doug Barton пишет: >> dougb 2011-10-15 00:45:28 UTC >> >> Log: >> Grant graphics/linux-tiff a stay of execution >> >> Due to the way that linux dependencies are recorded my greps f

Re: ports/162498: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable

2011-11-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/12/2011 15:38, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, John Hein wrote: >> m...@freebsd.org wrote at 08:05 + on Nov 12, 2011: >> > Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable >> > >> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> > State-Changed-By: miwi >> > State-C

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop chapter.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu chapter.sgml

2011-12-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/10/2011 13:29, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 12/10/11 15:06, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> On 10/12/2011 10:40 μμ, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:32:06 + (UTC) Manolis Kiagias >>> wrote: >>> >>> CCing re@, emulation@ and nwhitehorn@ due to a possible impact in the >>> u

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop chapter.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu chapter.sgml

2011-12-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/13/2011 05:42, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, December 12, 2011 9:28:43 pm Doug Barton wrote: >> On 12/10/2011 13:29, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> On 12/10/11 15:06, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>>> On 10/12/2011 10:40 μμ, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>>&g

Re: linux-f10-flashplugin11 not works for 9-stable (Linuxulator?)

2012-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/21/2012 02:43, Andrey Chernov wrote: > I can't - I don't know why npviewer.bin is killed by SIGTERM immediatelly > when it socketcall to [::1]:6010 in Linuxulator and why it works > normally when it socketcall to 127.0.0.1:6010. I remember when I had > FF 7, Flash works with ::1 first, but L

Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, I had the previous version of virtualbox working just fine on my up-to-date 8-stable i386 system, and upgraded to 4.1.8 today. When I attempt to load vboxdrv it instantly panics my system: panic: vm_object_deallocate: object deallocated too many times: 4 cpuid = 1 KDB: stack backtrace: db_

Re: Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding file > in the port and re-test the port? Good news, the kernel didn't panic. Bad news: supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8 vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, rc=

Re: Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/22/2012 01:20, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 22/02/2012 05:40 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 02/21/2012 15:51, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Could you please substitute the attached patch file for the corresponding >>> file >>> in the port and re-test t

Re: Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/22/2012 01:41, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > The 4.0.16 version is still available as emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy I know, that, but kind of beside the point, right? -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowle

Re: Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote: > The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder. Same result, different memory address: supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8 vboxdrv: supdrvInitDevExt failed, rc=-8 module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vboxdrv, 0xc66e8410, 0) erro

Re: Virtualbox 4.1.8 vboxdrv instantly panics on 8-stable i386

2012-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/22/2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 22/02/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 02/22/2012 02:23, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> The attached patched should try to grab the memory harder. >> >> Same result, different memory address: >> >> s

Re: X11BASE still in use in ports

2012-06-24 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/24/2012 05:37, Alex Kozlov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> I noticed a failure in one of my ports today while doing an upgrade, and >> was embarrassed to find that it was due to my port still using X11BASE. >> That led me to d