On 07/18/2011 14:28, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>> No strong objection from me, however, I would definitely be happier
>> to see this code as part of bsd.port.mk as I proposed in
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135221
Doing it properly in bpm does indeed seem preferable.
> I agree that this should be tested ... but there is a lot of code there
> that I didn't have time to puzzle through for my current -exp run.
>
> If the stanzas in the ports go away, then my hack goes away as well :-)
> Consider it temporary in the meantime.
Unfortunately our "temporary" hacks seem to have a habit of becoming
less so over time. Doing it properly in the first place helps nip that
in the bud.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
