Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port

2011-10-29 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:16:35 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > 28.10.2011 01:18, Eitan Adler пишет: > > > (d) Can you please provide a general review of the port? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161825 for details. > > If time permits I'll be glad to, but won't argue if someone

Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port

2011-10-29 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:16:43 -0500 "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > > Just a quick chiming in here: I installed the port, and it seems to be > working fine on my amd64 9.0-RC1 box. One more quick addition: so far, with this version, I haven't seen any of those annoying artifacts in other windows or

Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port

2011-10-29 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > > > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10. > galacticdominator% pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so pkg_info: both linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10 and linux-f10-flashplugin-11.0r1.152 claim to have insta

Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port

2011-10-29 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:05:35 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rusty Nejdl > wrote: > > > > > > > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10. > > > > galacticdominator% pkg_info -W > /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so > pkg_info: both linux-f1