On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:05:35 -0500
Adam Vande More <amvandem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rusty Nejdl
> <rne...@ringofsaturn.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10.
> >
>
> galacticdominator% pkg_info -W
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
> pkg_info: both linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10 and
> linux-f10-flashplugin-11.0r1.152 claim to have installed
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
>
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so was
> installed by package linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10
>
Yes, I noticed this, too. Perhaps both ports could be modified to
install to /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin${version} (10 or
11) instead?
Of course, if version 11 will just wind up superseding version 10, then
that's probably not even necessary (myself, I simply uninstalled the
older version and reinstalled the new one).
And still no sign of those old annoying artifacts! Yes! :-)
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
