On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:40:37PM -0500, lini...@portsmon.org
lini...@portsmon.org wrote:
> > On 06/22/2021 10:58 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I can't find a valid reason to have a vbox alias to emulation@ why
> > not make emulation@ the maintainer of the vbox softwar
Hello everyone,
one thing that we are doing during the migration is making it mandatory for the
mailing list to be either in CC or in the To, which means aliases to a mailing
list will not work anymore.
As of right now all email to vbox@ are bring rejected.
In anycase, I can't find a valid reaso
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:33:57PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Just a tiny background. I'm just experimenting with getting rid of
> in-base gcc and using compiler from ports whenever possible. And gcc46
> produces much better code then our gcc42.
>
> When I change USE_GCC to y
hi,
bsdtar do support directly extracting rpms, I have already converted a bunch of
ports for that.
Once the ports slush is over I plan to commit this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/extract-rpm-via-bsdtar.diff except is someone
raise an objection.
regards,
Bapt
pgpYdHtC3mKLG.pgp
Description:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:32:39PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 10:28, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >> Can I politely ask for emulation@ to give up maintainership for this port?
> >> Nobody here keeps this port updated and when patches are submitted nobody
> >> commits them.
>
> Thi
