On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:32:39PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 5 November 2012 10:28, Boris Samorodov <b...@passap.ru> wrote: > >> Can I politely ask for emulation@ to give up maintainership for this port? > >> Nobody here keeps this port updated and when patches are submitted nobody > >> commits them. > > This is false. I maintain the flash port (with an emulation@ hat). I > thought such PRs were supposed to be auto-assigned to me. I will look > into why they are not. > > > > Any committer may commit this PR with log: > > "Approved by: emulation@ (maintainer timeout XX weeks)" > > teams don't time out.
Since when (any rules to say that?)? imho that would be incredibly stupid that a team do not timeout, what happen in the case noone from a team have a look to a PR because of ENOTIME, or lack of resources or interest? regards, Bapt
pgpxSY2OVSR9Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
