Please do not double to post to emulation and ports. I have removed ports
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> Given the number of people who have/had trouble getting Flash
>> to work, telling the average user that this is not covered by a
>> common port version ch
Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 16 23:00:34 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
http://www.freebsd.org/
It seems part of the bug is already noticed by maintainer (Jung-uk Kim) but
nothing is done to fix it:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-September/064067.html
BTW, the bug is in native FreeBSD code (rpc.c), not in linux code.
Jung-uk, could you fix/hack it somehow, please?
O
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:47:05AM +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > Having 9-stable and ports from Feb 14, all builded from sources, I get
> > this commonly looking error attempting to view flash in FF 10.0.1:
> >
> > *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> I've personally never heard of it before, and looking at the product on
> their website isn't very helpful. It's clear that it's an MTA, but I can't
> for the life of me figure out what's so special about it. They keep
> emphasizing "policies"
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:12:39 -0600, Vick Khera wrote:
Has anyone run the MessageSystems Momentum email server in the
linuxalator? Their supported platforms are linux and solaris, but
having no experience managing either of those, I'd rather run it in
FreeBSD.
I've personally never heard of it
Has anyone run the MessageSystems Momentum email server in the
linuxalator? Their supported platforms are linux and solaris, but
having no experience managing either of those, I'd rather run it in
FreeBSD.
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
Robert Huff wrote:
> On my system, portversion did not catch the jump from Flash 9
> to Flash 11. Was this just me, or should there be an entry in
> UPDATING?
They are different ports. You need to switch to other one.
Given the number of people who have/had trouble
Volodymyr Kostyrko writes:
> >On my system, portversion did not catch the jump from Flash 9
> > to Flash 11. Was this just me, or should there be an entry in
> > UPDATING?
>
> They are different ports. You need to switch to other one.
Given the number of people who have/had tr
Robert Huff wrote:
Am running flash successfully on 9-stable (daily rebuild). Works for me
under chromium/seamonkey.
Just filed a patch for the latest flash version... Works for me also.
On my system, portversion did not catch the jump from Flash 9
to Flash 11. Was this just me,
Volodymyr Kostyrko writes:
> Am running flash successfully on 9-stable (daily rebuild). Works for me
> under chromium/seamonkey.
>
> Just filed a patch for the latest flash version... Works for me also.
On my system, portversion did not catch the jump from Flash 9
to Flash 11. Was
Andrey Chernov wrote:
Having 9-stable and ports from Feb 14, all builded from sources, I get
this commonly looking error attempting to view flash in FF 10.0.1:
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC
client connection
NOTE: child process received `Goodbye', closing d
12 matches
Mail list logo
